An Italian cost-utility analysis of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for routine vaccination in infants.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-15 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2495461
Michele Basile, Filippo Rumi, Agostino Fortunato, Debora Antonini, Roberto Di Virgilio, Giuseppe Novelli, Alessandra Pagliaro, Eugenio Di Brino
{"title":"An Italian cost-utility analysis of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for routine vaccination in infants.","authors":"Michele Basile, Filippo Rumi, Agostino Fortunato, Debora Antonini, Roberto Di Virgilio, Giuseppe Novelli, Alessandra Pagliaro, Eugenio Di Brino","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2495461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Streptococcus pneumoniae represents a significant global public health threat, causing approximately 45 million lower respiratory tract infections and 350,000 deaths annually among children under 5 years of age. Conjugate pneumococcal vaccines (PCVs), such as PCV15 and PCV20, have been developed to mitigate this burden by providing protection against serotypes responsible for the disease. The present analysis aims to evaluate the cost-utility of PCV20 compared to PCV15 as a vaccination strategy for preventing pneumococcal diseases in children in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A cost-utility analysis (CUA) was conducted using a static Markov model adapted to the Italian context to simulate the economic and clinical effects of vaccination over a 10-year time horizon. The study adopted the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS), considering only direct healthcare costs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore parameter uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model showed that PCV20 is a dominant strategy compared to PCV15, generating cost savings of €6.45 million and a gain of 101,708 QALYs (quality-adjusted life years). These benefits are attributed to PCV20's broader serotype coverage, which significantly reduces the incidence of invasive and non-invasive pneumococcal diseases. Vaccination with PCV20 offers substantial clinical and economic advantages over PCV15.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of PCV20 as a vaccination strategy for children in Italy represents a cost-effective and clinically advantageous option. Its implementation can reduce the burden of pneumococcal disease and associated healthcare costs, improving public health outcomes and the economic efficiency of the healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"674-687"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2495461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Streptococcus pneumoniae represents a significant global public health threat, causing approximately 45 million lower respiratory tract infections and 350,000 deaths annually among children under 5 years of age. Conjugate pneumococcal vaccines (PCVs), such as PCV15 and PCV20, have been developed to mitigate this burden by providing protection against serotypes responsible for the disease. The present analysis aims to evaluate the cost-utility of PCV20 compared to PCV15 as a vaccination strategy for preventing pneumococcal diseases in children in Italy.

Methods and materials: A cost-utility analysis (CUA) was conducted using a static Markov model adapted to the Italian context to simulate the economic and clinical effects of vaccination over a 10-year time horizon. The study adopted the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS), considering only direct healthcare costs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore parameter uncertainty.

Results: The model showed that PCV20 is a dominant strategy compared to PCV15, generating cost savings of €6.45 million and a gain of 101,708 QALYs (quality-adjusted life years). These benefits are attributed to PCV20's broader serotype coverage, which significantly reduces the incidence of invasive and non-invasive pneumococcal diseases. Vaccination with PCV20 offers substantial clinical and economic advantages over PCV15.

Conclusions: The introduction of PCV20 as a vaccination strategy for children in Italy represents a cost-effective and clinically advantageous option. Its implementation can reduce the burden of pneumococcal disease and associated healthcare costs, improving public health outcomes and the economic efficiency of the healthcare system.

意大利婴儿常规接种20价肺炎球菌结合疫苗的成本-效用分析。
背景:肺炎链球菌是一个重大的全球公共卫生威胁,每年在5岁以下儿童中造成约4500万例下呼吸道感染和35万例死亡。已经开发出肺炎球菌结合疫苗(pcv),如PCV15和PCV20,以通过提供对导致该疾病的血清型的保护来减轻这一负担。本分析旨在评估PCV20与PCV15作为预防意大利儿童肺炎球菌疾病的疫苗接种策略的成本效用。方法和材料:采用适合意大利背景的静态马尔可夫模型进行成本效用分析(CUA),以模拟10年时间范围内疫苗接种的经济和临床效果。该研究采用了意大利国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的视角,只考虑了直接医疗成本。采用确定性和概率敏感性分析来探讨参数的不确定性。结果:该模型显示,与PCV15相比,PCV20是一种占主导地位的策略,可节省645万欧元的成本,并获得101,708个质量调整寿命年(QALYs)。这些益处归因于PCV20更广泛的血清型覆盖,这大大降低了侵袭性和非侵袭性肺炎球菌疾病的发病率。与PCV15相比,接种PCV20具有显著的临床和经济优势。结论:在意大利,引入PCV20作为儿童疫苗接种策略是一种具有成本效益和临床优势的选择。它的实施可以减轻肺炎球菌疾病的负担和相关的卫生保健费用,改善公共卫生结果和卫生保健系统的经济效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信