Factors Influencing Discrepancies in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between iCare IC200 and Goldmann Tonometer.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Haowei Zhang, Jeong Woo Nam, Mi Sun Sung, Sang Woo Park
{"title":"Factors Influencing Discrepancies in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between iCare IC200 and Goldmann Tonometer.","authors":"Haowei Zhang, Jeong Woo Nam, Mi Sun Sung, Sang Woo Park","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Intraocular pressure measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry, central corneal thickness, and history of cataract surgery are factors in the discrepancies in intraocular pressure measurements between the iCare IC200 rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the factors affecting the discrepancies in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements between the iCare IC200 rebound tonometer (RBT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The IOP was measured sequentially using RBT followed by GAT. Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine the agreement between the RBT and GAT. Eyes were classified into three groups based on the difference calculated as RBT minus GAT: Group A (-1-1 mmHg), Group B (≥3 mmHg), and Group C (≤-3 mmHg). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with the measurement discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 402 right eyes were included in the study. The RBT and GAT measurements were significantly correlated (Spearman's r=0.885, P<0.001). The mean IOP differences between the RBT and GAT were 0.114±2.13 mmHg (range: -7-8, 95% limit of agreement: -4.06-4.29 mmHg). Multivariate logistic analyses revealed that greater central corneal thickness (CCT) (P=0.002) was significantly associated with overestimation of IOP by RBT relative to GAT. We found that underestimated IOP by RBT relative to GAT in patients with higher GAT-measured IOP (P=0.002) and those with a history of cataract surgery (P=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RBT tends to overestimate IOP relative to GAT in patients with thicker CCTs, while it underestimates IOP in those with higher GAT-measured IOP or a history of cataract surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002591","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prcis: Intraocular pressure measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry, central corneal thickness, and history of cataract surgery are factors in the discrepancies in intraocular pressure measurements between the iCare IC200 rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Purpose: To investigate the factors affecting the discrepancies in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements between the iCare IC200 rebound tonometer (RBT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT).

Materials and methods: The IOP was measured sequentially using RBT followed by GAT. Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine the agreement between the RBT and GAT. Eyes were classified into three groups based on the difference calculated as RBT minus GAT: Group A (-1-1 mmHg), Group B (≥3 mmHg), and Group C (≤-3 mmHg). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with the measurement discrepancies.

Results: A total of 402 right eyes were included in the study. The RBT and GAT measurements were significantly correlated (Spearman's r=0.885, P<0.001). The mean IOP differences between the RBT and GAT were 0.114±2.13 mmHg (range: -7-8, 95% limit of agreement: -4.06-4.29 mmHg). Multivariate logistic analyses revealed that greater central corneal thickness (CCT) (P=0.002) was significantly associated with overestimation of IOP by RBT relative to GAT. We found that underestimated IOP by RBT relative to GAT in patients with higher GAT-measured IOP (P=0.002) and those with a history of cataract surgery (P=0.006).

Conclusions: RBT tends to overestimate IOP relative to GAT in patients with thicker CCTs, while it underestimates IOP in those with higher GAT-measured IOP or a history of cataract surgery.

iCare IC200与Goldmann眼压计眼压测量差异的影响因素。
应用:iCare IC200反跳眼压计与Goldmann眼压计测量的眼压差异的因素包括:Goldmann眼压计测量的眼压、角膜中央厚度和白内障手术史。目的:探讨iCare IC200反跳眼压仪(RBT)与Goldmann压眼压仪(GAT)眼压测量差异的影响因素。材料和方法:眼内压依次采用RBT法和GAT法测定。使用Bland-Altman分析来确定RBT与GAT之间的一致性。根据RBT减去GAT计算的差值将眼睛分为3组:A组(-1-1 mmHg)、B组(≥3 mmHg)和C组(≤-3 mmHg)。进行Logistic回归分析以确定与测量差异相关的因素。结果:共纳入402只右眼。RBT和GAT测量值显著相关(Spearman’s r=0.885, p)。结论:在cct较厚的患者中,RBT倾向于高估相对于GAT的IOP,而在GAT测量的IOP较高或有白内障手术史的患者中,RBT倾向于低估IOP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信