After Radical Trachelectomy: Reproductive and Obstetrical Outcomes of Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Cervical Cancer.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sinor Soltanizadeh, Mikkel Rosendahl, Ligita Paskeviciute Frøding, Signe Frahm Bjørn, Berit Jul Mosgaard, Claus Høgdall
{"title":"After Radical Trachelectomy: Reproductive and Obstetrical Outcomes of Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Cervical Cancer.","authors":"Sinor Soltanizadeh, Mikkel Rosendahl, Ligita Paskeviciute Frøding, Signe Frahm Bjørn, Berit Jul Mosgaard, Claus Høgdall","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1808092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radical trachelectomy has become an accepted fertility-sparing treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Despite its oncological safety, radical trachelectomy is associated with persistent sexual dysfunction and voiding issues, complicating long-term quality of life. Fertility outcomes demonstrate overall pregnancy rates ranging from 25.7-73%, with less radical procedures such as conization and simple trachelectomy reporting higher pregnancy rates compared with radical trachelectomy. Assisted reproductive treatments might be necessary due to complications such as cervical stenosis. During pregnancy, there is an elevated risk of miscarriage, preterm delivery, and premature rupture of membranes due to cervical shortening. However, less radical fertility-sparing procedures such as conization and simple trachelectomy demonstrate lower preterm delivery rates. Prophylactic cerclage, as well as close monitoring of cervical length during pregnancy, is essential, and cesarean section remains the recommended method of delivery. Recent studies suggest that less radical fertility-sparing procedures may provide comparable oncological safety while reducing complications, highlighting the need to reevaluate surgical approaches. This review provides an overview of reproductive and obstetrical outcomes in patients after treatment for early-stage cervical cancer with trachelectomy. This review additionally emphasizes the need for further research to refine fertility-sparing strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21661,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in reproductive medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1808092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radical trachelectomy has become an accepted fertility-sparing treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Despite its oncological safety, radical trachelectomy is associated with persistent sexual dysfunction and voiding issues, complicating long-term quality of life. Fertility outcomes demonstrate overall pregnancy rates ranging from 25.7-73%, with less radical procedures such as conization and simple trachelectomy reporting higher pregnancy rates compared with radical trachelectomy. Assisted reproductive treatments might be necessary due to complications such as cervical stenosis. During pregnancy, there is an elevated risk of miscarriage, preterm delivery, and premature rupture of membranes due to cervical shortening. However, less radical fertility-sparing procedures such as conization and simple trachelectomy demonstrate lower preterm delivery rates. Prophylactic cerclage, as well as close monitoring of cervical length during pregnancy, is essential, and cesarean section remains the recommended method of delivery. Recent studies suggest that less radical fertility-sparing procedures may provide comparable oncological safety while reducing complications, highlighting the need to reevaluate surgical approaches. This review provides an overview of reproductive and obstetrical outcomes in patients after treatment for early-stage cervical cancer with trachelectomy. This review additionally emphasizes the need for further research to refine fertility-sparing strategies.

根治性气管切除术后:保留生育能力的宫颈癌手术的生殖和产科结果。
根治性气管切除术已成为一种可接受的保留生育能力的早期宫颈癌治疗方法。尽管其肿瘤安全性,根治性气管切除术与持续性性功能障碍和排尿问题有关,使长期生活质量复杂化。生育结果显示,总体妊娠率为25.7-73%,与根治性气管切除术相比,较少根治性手术(如锥形气管切除术和简单气管切除术)的妊娠率更高。由于颈椎狭窄等并发症,辅助生殖治疗可能是必要的。在怀孕期间,由于宫颈缩短,流产、早产和胎膜早破的风险增加。然而,不太彻底的保留生育能力的手术,如锥形和简单的气管切除术显示出较低的早产率。预防性环扎术,以及在怀孕期间密切监测宫颈长度是必不可少的,而剖宫产仍然是推荐的分娩方法。最近的研究表明,不太激进的保留生育能力的手术可能提供相当的肿瘤安全性,同时减少并发症,强调需要重新评估手术入路。本文综述了早期宫颈癌行气管切除术后患者的生殖和产科预后。这篇综述还强调需要进一步研究以完善生育节约策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in reproductive medicine
Seminars in reproductive medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Reproductive Medicine is a bi-monthly topic driven review journal that provides in-depth coverage of important advances in the understanding of normal and disordered human reproductive function, as well as new diagnostic and interventional techniques. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine offers an informed perspective on issues like male and female infertility, reproductive physiology, pharmacological hormonal manipulation, and state-of-the-art assisted reproductive technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信