A rapid method for Candida DNA preparation from sputum, and its clinical application.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Qingqing Sun, Yun Xie, Hanbing Meng, Lina Zhang, Zhengxin He
{"title":"A rapid method for Candida DNA preparation from sputum, and its clinical application.","authors":"Qingqing Sun, Yun Xie, Hanbing Meng, Lina Zhang, Zhengxin He","doi":"10.3855/jidc.19625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The analysis and identification of Candida in sputum specimens is of significance in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a previously validated rapid method for preparing Candida DNA in conjunction with pretreatment with Sputasol (Aiyan Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) for detecting Candida in sputum specimens.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study included 181 patients with respiratory diseases who were hospitalized at the Bethune International Peace Hospital between 9 and 29 January 2020. Sputum specimens were collected retrospectively, and sputum culture results and related clinical information were extracted from electronic medical records. The sputum samples were pre-treated with Sputasol digest and subjected to rapid DNA sample preparation, and duplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting Candida.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 181 sputum specimens, 65 tested positive for Candida through PCR, and 32 were positive through fungal culture. The samples that tested positive through fungal culture were also positive through PCR, and the identified species were completely consistent. Conversely, all samples that tested negative through PCR were also negative through fungal culture. The two assays showed moderate agreement, with a Kappa value of 0.554. The false-positive results of PCR Candida detection may be attributed to antifungal treatment and higher sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rapid Candida DNA sample preparation technique combined with duplex PCR for Candida detection is a sensitive method for identifying Candida in sputum. It is necessary to combine PCR results with comprehensive clinical judgment for deriving conclusions. Further studies are needed to verify its clinical value.</p>","PeriodicalId":49160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","volume":"19 4","pages":"623-629"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.19625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The analysis and identification of Candida in sputum specimens is of significance in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a previously validated rapid method for preparing Candida DNA in conjunction with pretreatment with Sputasol (Aiyan Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) for detecting Candida in sputum specimens.

Methodology: The study included 181 patients with respiratory diseases who were hospitalized at the Bethune International Peace Hospital between 9 and 29 January 2020. Sputum specimens were collected retrospectively, and sputum culture results and related clinical information were extracted from electronic medical records. The sputum samples were pre-treated with Sputasol digest and subjected to rapid DNA sample preparation, and duplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting Candida.

Results: Out of the 181 sputum specimens, 65 tested positive for Candida through PCR, and 32 were positive through fungal culture. The samples that tested positive through fungal culture were also positive through PCR, and the identified species were completely consistent. Conversely, all samples that tested negative through PCR were also negative through fungal culture. The two assays showed moderate agreement, with a Kappa value of 0.554. The false-positive results of PCR Candida detection may be attributed to antifungal treatment and higher sensitivity.

Conclusions: The rapid Candida DNA sample preparation technique combined with duplex PCR for Candida detection is a sensitive method for identifying Candida in sputum. It is necessary to combine PCR results with comprehensive clinical judgment for deriving conclusions. Further studies are needed to verify its clinical value.

痰液中念珠菌DNA的快速制备方法及其临床应用。
痰标本中念珠菌的分析鉴定对临床有重要意义。本研究的目的是评估一种先前验证的快速制备念珠菌DNA的方法的可行性,该方法与Sputasol(爱研生物技术,上海,中国)预处理相结合,用于检测痰标本中的念珠菌。方法:本研究纳入了2020年1月9日至29日期间在白求恩国际和平医院住院的181名呼吸系统疾病患者。回顾性采集痰标本,从电子病历中提取痰培养结果及相关临床信息。痰液经Sputasol消化液预处理后,进行快速DNA样品制备和双聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测念珠菌。结果:181份痰标本中,念珠菌PCR阳性65份,真菌培养阳性32份。通过真菌培养检测为阳性的样品也通过PCR检测为阳性,鉴定的菌种完全一致。相反,所有通过PCR检测为阴性的样品也通过真菌培养呈阴性。两种分析结果一致,Kappa值为0.554。PCR假阳性结果可能归因于抗真菌治疗和较高的敏感性。结论:念珠菌DNA快速制备技术结合双链PCR检测念珠菌是一种灵敏的痰液中念珠菌鉴定方法。结论需要将PCR结果与临床综合判断相结合。临床应用价值有待进一步研究验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
239
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC) is an international journal, intended for the publication of scientific articles from Developing Countries by scientists from Developing Countries. JIDC is an independent, on-line publication with an international editorial board. JIDC is open access with no cost to view or download articles and reasonable cost for publication of research artcles, making JIDC easily availiable to scientists from resource restricted regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信