Luke Johnson, Ezoza Rajabaliev, Kristin Canipe, Michael R Kazior
{"title":"Power Outage: A Simulation Case for Anesthesiology Residents.","authors":"Luke Johnson, Ezoza Rajabaliev, Kristin Canipe, Michael R Kazior","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Power outages in the OR are rare. However, anesthesia providers must be prepared to manage these situations until power is restored or their patient can be moved to a safe area. These situations occur so infrequently that many learners do not experience these events during their training. We designed a high-fidelity power outage simulation for anesthesiology residents to fill this training gap and enhance their preparedness and confidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In each simulation session consisting of up to four learners, one or two PGY 3/PGY 4 residents participated as anesthesiologists in a case involving an intraoperative power loss during a routine inguinal hernia repair of a patient under general anesthesia. After the simulation, residents received a debriefing focused on intraoperative power outage training. After concluding the debriefing, residents completed a 5-point Likert scale survey to assess their confidence in managing an intraoperative power loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 2 years, 22 anesthesiology residents completed the simulation. Residents' mean ratings of confidence in managing a patient in the OR during a power outage improved by 1.2 points (<i>p</i> =.001), confidence in monitoring vital signs improved by 1.4 (<i>p</i> = .001), and confidence in planning appropriate disposition improved by 0.9 (<i>p</i> =.001). All participants found the simulation highly valuable.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The anesthesiology-specific simulation proved to be an effective educational tool. Feedback was positive as residents agreed that the simulation was valuable for developing clinical reasoning and decision-making skills, significantly boosting their confidence to respond effectively and maintain patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"21 ","pages":"11523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12052912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Power outages in the OR are rare. However, anesthesia providers must be prepared to manage these situations until power is restored or their patient can be moved to a safe area. These situations occur so infrequently that many learners do not experience these events during their training. We designed a high-fidelity power outage simulation for anesthesiology residents to fill this training gap and enhance their preparedness and confidence.
Methods: In each simulation session consisting of up to four learners, one or two PGY 3/PGY 4 residents participated as anesthesiologists in a case involving an intraoperative power loss during a routine inguinal hernia repair of a patient under general anesthesia. After the simulation, residents received a debriefing focused on intraoperative power outage training. After concluding the debriefing, residents completed a 5-point Likert scale survey to assess their confidence in managing an intraoperative power loss.
Results: Over 2 years, 22 anesthesiology residents completed the simulation. Residents' mean ratings of confidence in managing a patient in the OR during a power outage improved by 1.2 points (p =.001), confidence in monitoring vital signs improved by 1.4 (p = .001), and confidence in planning appropriate disposition improved by 0.9 (p =.001). All participants found the simulation highly valuable.
Discussion: The anesthesiology-specific simulation proved to be an effective educational tool. Feedback was positive as residents agreed that the simulation was valuable for developing clinical reasoning and decision-making skills, significantly boosting their confidence to respond effectively and maintain patient safety.