One-Repetition Maximum and Repetitions to Failure at Submaximal Intensity in Eccentric-Only, Concentric-Only, and Conventional Arm Curl, Bench Press, and Back Squat Exercises.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Keisuke Shibata, Taichi Yamaguchi, Kota Shimamori, Yuta Yamazaki, Kazuki Takizawa, Kazunori Nosaka
{"title":"One-Repetition Maximum and Repetitions to Failure at Submaximal Intensity in Eccentric-Only, Concentric-Only, and Conventional Arm Curl, Bench Press, and Back Squat Exercises.","authors":"Keisuke Shibata, Taichi Yamaguchi, Kota Shimamori, Yuta Yamazaki, Kazuki Takizawa, Kazunori Nosaka","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Shibata, K, Yamaguchi, T, Shimamori, K, Yamazaki, Y, Takizawa, K, and Nosaka, K. One-repetition maximum and repetitions to failure at submaximal intensity in eccentric-only, concentric-only, and conventional arm curl, bench press, and back squat exercises. J Strength Cond Res 39(5): 515-522, 2025-The present study compared eccentric-only (ECC-only), concentric-only (CON-only), and eccentric-concentric (ECC-CON) arm curl (AC), bench press (BP), and back squat (BSQ) exercises for 1 repetition maximum (1RM) and repetitions to failure (RF) to delineate characteristics of ECC-only exercises. Twelve resistance-trained young men participated in 7 sessions. In session 1, 1RM of ECC-CON was determined for AC, BP, and BSQ. In session 2, ECC-CON 1RM for the 3 exercises were reassessed, and RF of ECC-CON at 80% of ECC-CON 1RM load was examined for the exercises. In sessions 3 and 4, RF of ECC-only and CON-only at 80% of ECC-CON 1RM load was determined. In session 5, ECC-only 1RM and CON-only 1RM were assessed for the exercises. In sessions 6 and 7, RF of ECC-only and CON-only at 80% of respective 1RM load was measured. The 1RM was greater (p < 0.01) for ECC-only (AC: 19.3 ± 3.6 kg, BP: 103.3 ± 18.2 kg, BSQ: 141.3 ± 17.5 kg) than for CON-only (AC: 14.6 ± 2.9 kg, BP: 82.3 ± 16.2 kg, BSQ: 113.8 ± 14.5 kg) and for ECC-CON (AC: 14.3 ± 3.2 kg, BP: 87.1 ± 16.2 kg, BSQ: 119.2 ± 16.1 kg) with a significant difference between CON-only and ECC-CON for BP only. The RF was greater (p < 0.01) in ECC-only than in CON-only and ECC-CON at 80% of ECC-CON 1RM and respective 80% 1RM load for all 3 exercises (e.g., BP at 80% of respective 1RM load, ECC-only: 14.5 ± 4.6, CON-only: 10.0 ± 3.3, ECC-CON: 10.3 ± 2.1 repetitions). These results suggest that greater loads can be handled in ECC-only with less fatigue than others, and this provides advantages for eccentric-only resistance exercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":"39 5","pages":"515-522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Shibata, K, Yamaguchi, T, Shimamori, K, Yamazaki, Y, Takizawa, K, and Nosaka, K. One-repetition maximum and repetitions to failure at submaximal intensity in eccentric-only, concentric-only, and conventional arm curl, bench press, and back squat exercises. J Strength Cond Res 39(5): 515-522, 2025-The present study compared eccentric-only (ECC-only), concentric-only (CON-only), and eccentric-concentric (ECC-CON) arm curl (AC), bench press (BP), and back squat (BSQ) exercises for 1 repetition maximum (1RM) and repetitions to failure (RF) to delineate characteristics of ECC-only exercises. Twelve resistance-trained young men participated in 7 sessions. In session 1, 1RM of ECC-CON was determined for AC, BP, and BSQ. In session 2, ECC-CON 1RM for the 3 exercises were reassessed, and RF of ECC-CON at 80% of ECC-CON 1RM load was examined for the exercises. In sessions 3 and 4, RF of ECC-only and CON-only at 80% of ECC-CON 1RM load was determined. In session 5, ECC-only 1RM and CON-only 1RM were assessed for the exercises. In sessions 6 and 7, RF of ECC-only and CON-only at 80% of respective 1RM load was measured. The 1RM was greater (p < 0.01) for ECC-only (AC: 19.3 ± 3.6 kg, BP: 103.3 ± 18.2 kg, BSQ: 141.3 ± 17.5 kg) than for CON-only (AC: 14.6 ± 2.9 kg, BP: 82.3 ± 16.2 kg, BSQ: 113.8 ± 14.5 kg) and for ECC-CON (AC: 14.3 ± 3.2 kg, BP: 87.1 ± 16.2 kg, BSQ: 119.2 ± 16.1 kg) with a significant difference between CON-only and ECC-CON for BP only. The RF was greater (p < 0.01) in ECC-only than in CON-only and ECC-CON at 80% of ECC-CON 1RM and respective 80% 1RM load for all 3 exercises (e.g., BP at 80% of respective 1RM load, ECC-only: 14.5 ± 4.6, CON-only: 10.0 ± 3.3, ECC-CON: 10.3 ± 2.1 repetitions). These results suggest that greater loads can be handled in ECC-only with less fatigue than others, and this provides advantages for eccentric-only resistance exercises.

单次最大重复次数和次最大强度重复,单偏心、单同心、常规臂屈、卧推和后蹲练习。
摘要:Shibata, K, Yamaguchi, T, Shimamori, K, Yamazaki, Y, Takizawa, K, and Nosaka, K.单次最大重复数和次最大强度重复数,单次最大重复数,单次最大重复数,单次最大重复数,单次最大重复数,单次最大重复数,单次最大重复数,单次最大重复数,单次最大重复数,单次最大重复数。[力量杂志]39(5):515-522,2025-本研究比较了单离心(ECC-only)、单同心(CON-only)和单离心-同心(ECC-CON)旋臂(AC)、卧推(BP)和后蹲(BSQ)练习的1次最大重复(1RM)和重复失败(RF),以描述单离心练习的特征。12名受过阻力训练的年轻人参加了7次训练。在第1阶段,测定ec - con的AC、BP和BSQ的1RM。在第2阶段,重新评估3种练习的ECC-CON 1RM,并检查ECC-CON在80%的ECC-CON 1RM负荷下的RF。在第3次和第4次试验中,测定了仅ec和仅con在80% ec - con 1RM负荷下的RF。在第5次会议中,评估了仅ec - 1RM和仅con - 1RM的练习。在第6期和第7期,仅ec和仅con的RF在各自1RM负载的80%时被测量。单用ecc (AC: 19.3±3.6 kg, BP: 103.3±18.2 kg, BSQ: 141.3±17.5 kg)的1RM大于单用con (AC: 14.6±2.9 kg, BP: 82.3±16.2 kg, BSQ: 113.8±14.5 kg)和单用ECC-CON (AC: 14.3±3.2 kg, BP: 87.1±16.2 kg, BSQ: 119.2±16.1 kg)的1RM (p < 0.01),且单用con与单用ECC-CON之间存在显著差异。在所有3种运动中,在80%的ECC-CON 1RM和各自80%的1RM负荷下,ECC-CON组的RF大于con - con组和ECC-CON组(例如,在各自1RM负荷的80%时,血压,ECC-only: 14.5±4.6,CON-only: 10.0±3.3,ECC-CON: 10.3±2.1)。这些结果表明,更大的载荷可以处理ECC-only比其他更少的疲劳,这为偏心阻力练习提供了优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信