Feasibility of deep sedation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using pulsed field ablation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Romil Patel, Riya Sam, Lavisha Singh, Westby Fisher, Mark Metzl, Jose Nazari, Alex Ro, Hany Demo, Jeremiah Wasserlauf
{"title":"Feasibility of deep sedation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using pulsed field ablation.","authors":"Romil Patel, Riya Sam, Lavisha Singh, Westby Fisher, Mark Metzl, Jose Nazari, Alex Ro, Hany Demo, Jeremiah Wasserlauf","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02050-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal energy source for catheter ablation associated with shorter procedure time, less risk of esophageal injury, and less dependence on absolute catheter stability compared with radiofrequency ablation. Limited data are available on performing the procedure with deep sedation (DS) as an alternative to general anesthesia (GA) utilizing endotracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent PFA using DS between March and August 2024 were retrospectively included. DS was administered by anesthesia staff, consisting of propofol, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, and midazolam, at the discretion of the practitioner. The primary endpoint was the rate of airway complications or requirement for conversion to GA. Secondary endpoints were the rate of acute procedural success, total time in the EP lab, procedure time, and non-procedure time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 patients (mean age 71.9 ± 11.6 years, BMI 30.1 ± 7.1, 51% females) were included in the analysis. There were no instances of airway complications or conversion from DS to GA. There was a 100% rate of acute isolation of pulmonary veins. The average total time in the lab was 149.7 ± 44.7 min, consisting of a mean procedure time of 98.3 ± 40.5 min and a non-procedure time of 51.4 ± 12.2 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study conducted at a single health system, DS for PFA was feasible and associated with no instances of airway complications nor conversion to GA. The findings may not apply to patients with moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea or other pulmonary diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02050-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal energy source for catheter ablation associated with shorter procedure time, less risk of esophageal injury, and less dependence on absolute catheter stability compared with radiofrequency ablation. Limited data are available on performing the procedure with deep sedation (DS) as an alternative to general anesthesia (GA) utilizing endotracheal intubation.

Methods: Patients who underwent PFA using DS between March and August 2024 were retrospectively included. DS was administered by anesthesia staff, consisting of propofol, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, and midazolam, at the discretion of the practitioner. The primary endpoint was the rate of airway complications or requirement for conversion to GA. Secondary endpoints were the rate of acute procedural success, total time in the EP lab, procedure time, and non-procedure time.

Results: A total of 100 patients (mean age 71.9 ± 11.6 years, BMI 30.1 ± 7.1, 51% females) were included in the analysis. There were no instances of airway complications or conversion from DS to GA. There was a 100% rate of acute isolation of pulmonary veins. The average total time in the lab was 149.7 ± 44.7 min, consisting of a mean procedure time of 98.3 ± 40.5 min and a non-procedure time of 51.4 ± 12.2 min.

Conclusions: In this study conducted at a single health system, DS for PFA was feasible and associated with no instances of airway complications nor conversion to GA. The findings may not apply to patients with moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea or other pulmonary diseases.

深度镇静用于脉冲场消融房颤导管消融的可行性。
简介:与射频消融相比,脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种非热能的导管消融方法,具有手术时间短、食管损伤风险小、对导管绝对稳定性依赖小等优点。关于使用深度镇静(DS)作为气管插管全麻(GA)的替代方法进行手术的数据有限。方法:回顾性分析2024年3月至8月期间使用DS进行PFA的患者。DS由麻醉人员给予,由异丙酚、右美托咪定、芬太尼和咪达唑仑组成,由医生自行决定。主要终点是气道并发症的发生率或转换为GA的要求。次要终点是急性手术成功率、在EP实验室的总时间、手术时间和非手术时间。结果:共纳入100例患者,平均年龄71.9±11.6岁,BMI 30.1±7.1,女性占51%。没有发生气道并发症或从DS到GA的转换。肺静脉急性隔离率为100%。实验室平均总时间为149.7±44.7分钟,其中平均手术时间为98.3±40.5分钟,非手术时间为51.4±12.2分钟。结论:在单一卫生系统进行的研究中,PFA的DS是可行的,没有气道并发症的发生,也没有转化为GA的情况。该研究结果可能不适用于中度或重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停或其他肺部疾病患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信