Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the SCI falls concern scale (SCI-FCS) among manual wheelchair users in Delhi, India.

IF 0.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ruby Aikat, Priyanka Vijay, Swati Misra, Maneesh Bhardwaj, Neha Khanna, Chitra Kataria, Nishu Tyagi
{"title":"Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the SCI falls concern scale (SCI-FCS) among manual wheelchair users in Delhi, India.","authors":"Ruby Aikat, Priyanka Vijay, Swati Misra, Maneesh Bhardwaj, Neha Khanna, Chitra Kataria, Nishu Tyagi","doi":"10.1038/s41394-025-00705-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Methodological Research Design.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To establish the content validity, internal consistency reliability & test-retest reliability of the SCI-FCS for individuals with SCI in Delhi, India.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A panel of 13 experts validated the content of the 16-item scale using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The scale was then piloted with 43 manual wheelchair users with SCI. Internal consistency was assessed through item analysis, and 20 participants were retested after one week to evaluate test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All items met the minimum Content Validity Ratio (CVR) of 0.54 required for 13 experts, ensuring their retention. The scale demonstrated a strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.865) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.785).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SCI-FCS is a valid and reliable tool to assess the fall concerns in manual wheelchair users with SCI in Delhi, India. It can help rehabilitation professionals evaluate the effectiveness of fall prevention interventions.</p><p><strong>Sponsorship: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":22079,"journal":{"name":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","volume":"11 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-025-00705-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Methodological Research Design.

Objectives: To establish the content validity, internal consistency reliability & test-retest reliability of the SCI-FCS for individuals with SCI in Delhi, India.

Setting: Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, India.

Methods: A panel of 13 experts validated the content of the 16-item scale using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The scale was then piloted with 43 manual wheelchair users with SCI. Internal consistency was assessed through item analysis, and 20 participants were retested after one week to evaluate test-retest reliability.

Results: All items met the minimum Content Validity Ratio (CVR) of 0.54 required for 13 experts, ensuring their retention. The scale demonstrated a strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.865) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.785).

Conclusion: The SCI-FCS is a valid and reliable tool to assess the fall concerns in manual wheelchair users with SCI in Delhi, India. It can help rehabilitation professionals evaluate the effectiveness of fall prevention interventions.

Sponsorship: None.

在印度德里的手动轮椅使用者中,SCI跌落关注量表(SCI- fcs)的跨文化验证和心理测量测试。
研究设计:方法学研究设计。目的:建立印度德里地区SCI- fcs的内容效度、内部一致性信度和重测信度。地点:印度脊髓损伤中心。方法:由13名专家组成的小组采用定性和定量方法对16项量表的内容进行验证。然后在43名患有脊髓损伤的手动轮椅使用者中试用该量表。通过项目分析评估内部一致性,并在一周后对20名被试进行重测,评估重测信度。结果:所有题目均满足13位专家所要求的最小内容效比(CVR) 0.54,保证了题目的保留。量表具有较强的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.865)和较好的重测信度(ICC = 0.785)。结论:SCI- fcs是一种有效和可靠的工具,用于评估在印度德里的SCI手动轮椅使用者的跌倒问题。它可以帮助康复专业人员评估预防跌倒干预措施的有效性。赞助:没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spinal Cord Series and Cases
Spinal Cord Series and Cases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
92
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信