Minimally invasive surgical treatments versus non-surgical treatments or placebo for plantar fasciopathy: A systematic review.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Stefan Møller, Jonas Ammundsen Ipsen, Henriette Jahn Aunass, Per Aagaard, Bjarke Viberg, Ane Simony, Henrik Riel
{"title":"Minimally invasive surgical treatments versus non-surgical treatments or placebo for plantar fasciopathy: A systematic review.","authors":"Stefan Møller, Jonas Ammundsen Ipsen, Henriette Jahn Aunass, Per Aagaard, Bjarke Viberg, Ane Simony, Henrik Riel","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2025.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to advances in minimally invasive surgical treatments (MIST), this systematic review with a narrative synthesis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of MIST in improving pain compared with non-surgical treatment or placebo in patients with plantar fasciopathy (PF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched relevant databases for peer-reviewed studies comparing MIST to non-surgical treatments or placebo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were included. The results demonstrated statistically significant superiority in pain reduction for percutaneous needle treatments compared to non-surgical treatments or placebo in five studies. One study compared endoscopic plantar fascia release to exercise and corticosteroid injections and found a statistically significant superiority of endoscopic plantar fascia release.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review found promising effects of needle treatments to reduce pain among patients with PF. Endoscopic plantar fascia release was superior to the comparator in one of three studies. High risks of bias and methodological heterogeneity limit the strength of the available evidence.</p><p><strong>Level of clinical evidence: </strong>II.</p>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2025.04.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to advances in minimally invasive surgical treatments (MIST), this systematic review with a narrative synthesis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of MIST in improving pain compared with non-surgical treatment or placebo in patients with plantar fasciopathy (PF).

Methods: We systematically searched relevant databases for peer-reviewed studies comparing MIST to non-surgical treatments or placebo.

Results: Eight studies were included. The results demonstrated statistically significant superiority in pain reduction for percutaneous needle treatments compared to non-surgical treatments or placebo in five studies. One study compared endoscopic plantar fascia release to exercise and corticosteroid injections and found a statistically significant superiority of endoscopic plantar fascia release.

Conclusions: This systematic review found promising effects of needle treatments to reduce pain among patients with PF. Endoscopic plantar fascia release was superior to the comparator in one of three studies. High risks of bias and methodological heterogeneity limit the strength of the available evidence.

Level of clinical evidence: II.

微创手术治疗与非手术治疗或安慰剂治疗足底筋膜病:一项系统综述。
背景:由于微创手术治疗(MIST)的进展,本系统综述旨在探讨与非手术治疗或安慰剂相比,MIST在改善足底筋膜病(PF)患者疼痛方面的有效性。方法:我们系统地检索了相关数据库,以比较MIST与非手术治疗或安慰剂的同行评议研究。结果:纳入8项研究。结果显示,在五项研究中,经皮针刺治疗与非手术治疗或安慰剂治疗相比,在减轻疼痛方面具有统计学上的显著优势。一项研究比较了内窥镜下足底筋膜释放与运动和皮质类固醇注射,发现内窥镜下足底筋膜释放具有统计学上显著的优势。结论:本系统综述发现针刺治疗在减轻PF患者疼痛方面有很好的效果。在三项研究中,有一项研究的内窥镜下足底筋膜释放优于比较方法。高偏倚风险和方法异质性限制了现有证据的强度。临床证据水平:II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信