Semaglutide Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Alone For Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Catherine Vu, Raymond Thai, Dozie Dike, Bria Sydner
{"title":"Semaglutide Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Alone For Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Catherine Vu, Raymond Thai, Dozie Dike, Bria Sydner","doi":"10.1007/s11126-025-10137-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine whether combination therapy (semaglutide + metformin) is more efficacious than monotherapy (metformin alone) in reducing the risk of antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). This was a single-center, retrospective study evaluating patients ≥ 18 years of age receiving care at Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MEDVAMC) from January 2021 to December 2022. Subjects were identified by use of antipsychotic (quetiapine, risperidone, paliperidone, olanzapine, clozapine) with concomitant use of monotherapy or combination therapy. Key exclusion criteria included other medications impacting weight, unstable medical illness, active substance use disorder, and dual antipsychotic use. The primary endpoint was defined as weight loss ≥ 5% from baseline. Secondary outcomes included BMI % difference and HbA1c difference from baseline. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. 31 patients were evaluated in each group for the final analysis. 38.7% (12/31) of patients in the monotherapy group achieved the primary outcome of weight loss ≥ 5% from baseline vs. 61.29% (19/31) in the combination group (p = 0.04). For secondary outcomes, the BMI % difference from baseline in the monotherapy group was -3.88% vs. -5.58% in the combination group (p = 0.129). The monotherapy group had a difference in HbA1c % from baseline of 0.14% vs -0.9% in the combination group (p = 0.007). Among T2DM patients on antipsychotics, more patients in the combination group achieved weight loss ≥ 5% within the study period compared to metformin monotherapy. Future research should account for non-diabetic patients, assess lifestyle factors, and exclude other psychotropic medications that may affect weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":20658,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-025-10137-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine whether combination therapy (semaglutide + metformin) is more efficacious than monotherapy (metformin alone) in reducing the risk of antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). This was a single-center, retrospective study evaluating patients ≥ 18 years of age receiving care at Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MEDVAMC) from January 2021 to December 2022. Subjects were identified by use of antipsychotic (quetiapine, risperidone, paliperidone, olanzapine, clozapine) with concomitant use of monotherapy or combination therapy. Key exclusion criteria included other medications impacting weight, unstable medical illness, active substance use disorder, and dual antipsychotic use. The primary endpoint was defined as weight loss ≥ 5% from baseline. Secondary outcomes included BMI % difference and HbA1c difference from baseline. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. 31 patients were evaluated in each group for the final analysis. 38.7% (12/31) of patients in the monotherapy group achieved the primary outcome of weight loss ≥ 5% from baseline vs. 61.29% (19/31) in the combination group (p = 0.04). For secondary outcomes, the BMI % difference from baseline in the monotherapy group was -3.88% vs. -5.58% in the combination group (p = 0.129). The monotherapy group had a difference in HbA1c % from baseline of 0.14% vs -0.9% in the combination group (p = 0.007). Among T2DM patients on antipsychotics, more patients in the combination group achieved weight loss ≥ 5% within the study period compared to metformin monotherapy. Future research should account for non-diabetic patients, assess lifestyle factors, and exclude other psychotropic medications that may affect weight.

西马鲁肽联合二甲双胍与单用二甲双胍治疗抗精神病药诱导的2型糖尿病患者体重增加的比较
确定在降低2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者抗精神病性体重增加(AIWG)的风险方面,联合治疗(西马鲁肽+二甲双胍)是否比单一治疗(单用二甲双胍)更有效。这是一项单中心、回顾性研究,评估2021年1月至2022年12月在Michael E. DeBakey退伍军人事务医疗中心(MEDVAMC)接受治疗的≥18岁的患者。受试者通过使用抗精神病药物(喹硫平、利培酮、帕利哌酮、奥氮平、氯氮平)同时使用单药或联合治疗来确定。主要排除标准包括影响体重的其他药物、不稳定的医学疾病、活性物质使用障碍和双重抗精神病药物使用。主要终点定义为体重较基线下降≥5%。次要结局包括BMI %的差异和HbA1c与基线的差异。数据分析采用描述性统计。每组评估31例患者进行最终分析。单药组38.7%(12/31)的患者达到了较基线体重减轻≥5%的主要结局,而联合治疗组为61.29% (19/31)(p = 0.04)。对于次要结局,单药组与基线的BMI %差异为-3.88%,联合治疗组为-5.58% (p = 0.129)。单药治疗组HbA1c较基线值的差异为0.14%,联合治疗组为-0.9% (p = 0.007)。在接受抗精神病药物治疗的T2DM患者中,与单用二甲双胍治疗相比,联合用药组在研究期间体重减轻≥5%的患者较多。未来的研究应考虑非糖尿病患者,评估生活方式因素,并排除其他可能影响体重的精神药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric Quarterly
Psychiatric Quarterly PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Quarterly publishes original research, theoretical papers, and review articles on the assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons with psychiatric disabilities, with emphasis on care provided in public, community, and private institutional settings such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Qualitative and quantitative studies concerning the social, clinical, administrative, legal, political, and ethical aspects of mental health care fall within the scope of the journal. Content areas include, but are not limited to, evidence-based practice in prevention, diagnosis, and management of psychiatric disorders; interface of psychiatry with primary and specialty medicine; disparities of access and outcomes in health care service delivery; and socio-cultural and cross-cultural aspects of mental health and wellness, including mental health literacy. 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.023 (2007) Section ''Psychiatry'': Rank 70 out of 82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信