Iden M Amiri, Heran W Gebreyesus, Jennifer L Patnaik, Malik Y Kahook, Leonard K Seibold
{"title":"Functionality and Priming Stream Patterns of the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve in a Laboratory Setting.","authors":"Iden M Amiri, Heran W Gebreyesus, Jennifer L Patnaik, Malik Y Kahook, Leonard K Seibold","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S512260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if there is a significant association between the steady state pressure of Ahmed Glaucoma Valves (AGVs) and the fluid pattern exhibited during the priming step of implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this experimental laboratory study, fifty AGVs were primed according to manufacturer guidelines by injecting balanced salt solution through a 27-gauge cannula. Group 1 consisted of 8 AGVs with a distinct stream priming pattern. Group 2 consisted of 7 AGVs without a distinct stream priming pattern (pooling). These valves were further tested using a perfusion system to measure steady-state pressure across the valve. A Student's <i>t</i>-test was used to assess the differences in mean steady-state pressures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>43/50 AGVs (86%) demonstrated a distinct stream of fluid during priming (group 1), while 7 (14%) showed a pooling of fluid only, without a focal stream (group 2). Steady-state pressure was achieved by 45 seconds for the 15 samples. The mean steady-state pressure (± standard deviation) at 60 seconds was 11.00 ± 1.90 mmHg for group 1 and 10.31 ± 2.53 mmHg for group 2 (p = 0.56), demonstrating no significant difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most common fluid pattern observed is a focal stream of fluid exiting the valve, with a minority exhibiting a slow pooling of fluid. The fluid pattern observed during AGV priming does not predict the valve's functionality, as both priming patterns resulted in similar steady-state pressures, which were consistently in line with manufacturer specifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"1411-1416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S512260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To determine if there is a significant association between the steady state pressure of Ahmed Glaucoma Valves (AGVs) and the fluid pattern exhibited during the priming step of implantation.
Methods: In this experimental laboratory study, fifty AGVs were primed according to manufacturer guidelines by injecting balanced salt solution through a 27-gauge cannula. Group 1 consisted of 8 AGVs with a distinct stream priming pattern. Group 2 consisted of 7 AGVs without a distinct stream priming pattern (pooling). These valves were further tested using a perfusion system to measure steady-state pressure across the valve. A Student's t-test was used to assess the differences in mean steady-state pressures.
Results: 43/50 AGVs (86%) demonstrated a distinct stream of fluid during priming (group 1), while 7 (14%) showed a pooling of fluid only, without a focal stream (group 2). Steady-state pressure was achieved by 45 seconds for the 15 samples. The mean steady-state pressure (± standard deviation) at 60 seconds was 11.00 ± 1.90 mmHg for group 1 and 10.31 ± 2.53 mmHg for group 2 (p = 0.56), demonstrating no significant difference between groups.
Conclusion: The most common fluid pattern observed is a focal stream of fluid exiting the valve, with a minority exhibiting a slow pooling of fluid. The fluid pattern observed during AGV priming does not predict the valve's functionality, as both priming patterns resulted in similar steady-state pressures, which were consistently in line with manufacturer specifications.