Buprenorphine discontinuation and utilization of psychosocial services: a national study in the Veterans Health Administration.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Emma N Cleary, Angela L Rollins, Alan B McGuire, Laura J Myers, Patrick D Quinn
{"title":"Buprenorphine discontinuation and utilization of psychosocial services: a national study in the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Emma N Cleary, Angela L Rollins, Alan B McGuire, Laura J Myers, Patrick D Quinn","doi":"10.1186/s13722-025-00562-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Longer duration of treatment with medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is associated with improved outcomes, but long-term retention remains a challenge. Research is needed to identify psychosocial interventions that support MOUD retention. To address this gap, we examined associations between a wide range of psychosocial services and buprenorphine treatment discontinuation across 18 months among a large cohort of Veterans initiating buprenorphine nationwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified a cohort of patients with new buprenorphine initiation in 2017-2018 in Veterans Health Administration electronic health record data (N = 11,704). We examined prescription fills for up to 18 months after initiation. The primary outcome was first discontinuation of buprenorphine. We examined a variety of services, including psychotherapy in specialty substance use disorder (SUD) and mental health clinics, other healthcare services, and residential programs. To examine time-varying associations between psychosocial services and risk of discontinuation, we fit extended Cox regression models for each service separately and simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 80.5% of patients discontinued buprenorphine at least once within 18 months. Risk of discontinuation was 18% (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.87) relatively lower following SUD psychotherapy and 26% (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.15,1.39) higher following residential treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several services, including residential treatment, were associated with greater risk of subsequent buprenorphine discontinuation, whereas only SUD psychotherapy was consistently associated with lower risk of later discontinuation. These findings emphasize the need for future studies to increase understandings of beneficial and disruptive components of psychosocial services to improve treatment retention among patients receiving MOUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00562-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Longer duration of treatment with medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is associated with improved outcomes, but long-term retention remains a challenge. Research is needed to identify psychosocial interventions that support MOUD retention. To address this gap, we examined associations between a wide range of psychosocial services and buprenorphine treatment discontinuation across 18 months among a large cohort of Veterans initiating buprenorphine nationwide.

Methods: We identified a cohort of patients with new buprenorphine initiation in 2017-2018 in Veterans Health Administration electronic health record data (N = 11,704). We examined prescription fills for up to 18 months after initiation. The primary outcome was first discontinuation of buprenorphine. We examined a variety of services, including psychotherapy in specialty substance use disorder (SUD) and mental health clinics, other healthcare services, and residential programs. To examine time-varying associations between psychosocial services and risk of discontinuation, we fit extended Cox regression models for each service separately and simultaneously.

Results: Overall, 80.5% of patients discontinued buprenorphine at least once within 18 months. Risk of discontinuation was 18% (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.87) relatively lower following SUD psychotherapy and 26% (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.15,1.39) higher following residential treatment.

Conclusions: Several services, including residential treatment, were associated with greater risk of subsequent buprenorphine discontinuation, whereas only SUD psychotherapy was consistently associated with lower risk of later discontinuation. These findings emphasize the need for future studies to increase understandings of beneficial and disruptive components of psychosocial services to improve treatment retention among patients receiving MOUD.

丁丙诺啡停药和心理社会服务的利用:退伍军人健康管理局的一项全国性研究。
背景:阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)的药物治疗持续时间较长与改善预后相关,但长期保留仍然是一个挑战。需要进行研究以确定支持mod保留的社会心理干预措施。为了解决这一差距,我们在全国范围内对一大批开始服用丁丙诺啡的退伍军人进行了为期18个月的研究,研究了广泛的社会心理服务与丁丙诺啡治疗中断之间的关系。方法:我们在退伍军人健康管理局电子健康记录数据中确定了2017-2018年新的丁丙诺啡起始患者队列(N = 11,704)。我们检查了起始后18个月的处方填充。主要结局是首次停用丁丙诺啡。我们检查了各种服务,包括特殊物质使用障碍(SUD)和心理健康诊所的心理治疗,其他医疗保健服务和住宿计划。为了检验心理社会服务与中断风险之间随时间变化的关联,我们分别并同时拟合了每种服务的扩展Cox回归模型。结果:总体而言,80.5%的患者在18个月内至少停药一次丁丙诺啡。SUD心理治疗的停药风险为18% (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.87),而住院治疗的停药风险为26% (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.15,1.39)。结论:包括住院治疗在内的几种服务与随后的丁丙诺啡停药风险较高相关,而只有SUD心理治疗与随后的停药风险较低相关。这些发现强调了未来的研究需要增加对心理社会服务有益和有害成分的理解,以提高接受mod的患者的治疗依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信