{"title":"A Japanese national survey on IMRT/SBRT in 2023 by the JASTRO High-Precision External Beam Radiotherapy Group.","authors":"Masahide Saito, Shuichi Ozawa, Takafumi Komiyama, Masaki Kokubo, Yoshiyuki Shioyama, Yukinori Matsuo, Takashi Mizowaki, Tomoki Kimura, Hideyuki Harada, Hiroshi Igaki, Naoki Tohyama, Masahiko Kurooka, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Yu Kumazaki, Hidekazu Suzuki, Hikaru Nemoto, Nagata Yasushi, Hiroshi Onishi","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rraf009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate the utilization and implementation of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in Japan up to 2023. The survey was conducted by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology High-Precision External Beam Radiotherapy Group Subcommittee from December 2023 to February 2024. The study targeted patients treated with IMRT or SBRT between January 2021 and December 2022. A comprehensive web-based questionnaire was distributed to 880 facilities, with separate sections for radiation oncologists and medical physicists/radiotherapy technologists. A total of 360 facilities responded (response rate: 40.9%) for the section of radiation oncologists, and 405 facilities responded (response rate: 46.0%) for medical physicists/radiotherapy technologists, providing data on the implementation status, techniques, workload and challenges associated with IMRT and SBRT. Based on the responses in the section of radiation oncologists, IMRT was used in 68.6% of responding institutes, and SBRT in 87.8%. VMAT emerged as the most common IMRT technique (78.3%). The survey highlighted a high demand for medical physicists to perform IMRT (86.9%). Based on the responses in the section of medical physicists/radiotherapy technologists, 84.6% of the facilities that have not performed IMRT reported that the main reason was a lack of radiation oncologists. Furthermore, the survey also noted significant variations in prescribed doses and margin sizes across facilities, indicating the need for further standardization. High-precision radiation techniques such as IMRT and SBRT are getting popular, however, the facility requirements which mandate the presence of at least two radiation oncologists prevents IMRT from becoming more widespread in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":"234-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraf009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the utilization and implementation of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in Japan up to 2023. The survey was conducted by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology High-Precision External Beam Radiotherapy Group Subcommittee from December 2023 to February 2024. The study targeted patients treated with IMRT or SBRT between January 2021 and December 2022. A comprehensive web-based questionnaire was distributed to 880 facilities, with separate sections for radiation oncologists and medical physicists/radiotherapy technologists. A total of 360 facilities responded (response rate: 40.9%) for the section of radiation oncologists, and 405 facilities responded (response rate: 46.0%) for medical physicists/radiotherapy technologists, providing data on the implementation status, techniques, workload and challenges associated with IMRT and SBRT. Based on the responses in the section of radiation oncologists, IMRT was used in 68.6% of responding institutes, and SBRT in 87.8%. VMAT emerged as the most common IMRT technique (78.3%). The survey highlighted a high demand for medical physicists to perform IMRT (86.9%). Based on the responses in the section of medical physicists/radiotherapy technologists, 84.6% of the facilities that have not performed IMRT reported that the main reason was a lack of radiation oncologists. Furthermore, the survey also noted significant variations in prescribed doses and margin sizes across facilities, indicating the need for further standardization. High-precision radiation techniques such as IMRT and SBRT are getting popular, however, the facility requirements which mandate the presence of at least two radiation oncologists prevents IMRT from becoming more widespread in Japan.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO).
Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal.
Articles considered fall into two broad categories:
Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable.
Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences.
Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry.
The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.