Objective Assessment of Skill Retention 7 Months Post-Training: Motion Analysis of Central Venous Catheter Placement.

Vincent Baribeau, Miheer P Sane, Aidan Sharkey, Kadhiresan R Murugappan, Daniel P Walsh, Vanessa T Wong, John D Mitchell
{"title":"Objective Assessment of Skill Retention 7 Months Post-Training: Motion Analysis of Central Venous Catheter Placement.","authors":"Vincent Baribeau, Miheer P Sane, Aidan Sharkey, Kadhiresan R Murugappan, Daniel P Walsh, Vanessa T Wong, John D Mitchell","doi":"10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Mitchell","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central venous catheter (CVC) placement is a technically challenging skill. Routine assessment tools, including checklists and global rating scales, require subjective expert evaluation. We hypothesized that motion analysis could be used to objectively assess skill retention in CVC placement by comparing the performance of anesthesiology residents immediately after training and 7 months later.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After learning to perform CVC placement on a mannikin, 12 first-year anesthesiology residents each performed a \"baseline\" trial with electromagnetic motion sensors on the dorsum of their dominant hand and base of their ultrasound probe. Seven months later, they each performed a \"follow-up\" mannikin trial with an identical setup. For each trial, sensors recorded participants' path length, translational motions, and rotational sum. Time was recorded for each trial as well. We defined skill retention as performance within 1 standard deviation or less of the entire cohort's average at baseline (threshold). We compared the number of residents who met the threshold, which indicated less excessive motion and therefore better performance, at baseline with the number at follow-up using McNemar's test across each metric for each sensor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For path length, translational motions, and rotational sum of the probe, significantly more residents met the threshold at baseline than at follow-up (<i>P</i> < .04). No significant differences were detected for any metrics of the dorsum or time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Motion analysis can objectively assess skill decay in anesthesiology residents performing CVC placement. Residents exhibited skill retention in tasks involving their dominant hand and skill decay in tasks involving the ultrasound probe (nondominant hand).</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"27 1","pages":"E742"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Mitchell","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Central venous catheter (CVC) placement is a technically challenging skill. Routine assessment tools, including checklists and global rating scales, require subjective expert evaluation. We hypothesized that motion analysis could be used to objectively assess skill retention in CVC placement by comparing the performance of anesthesiology residents immediately after training and 7 months later.

Methods: After learning to perform CVC placement on a mannikin, 12 first-year anesthesiology residents each performed a "baseline" trial with electromagnetic motion sensors on the dorsum of their dominant hand and base of their ultrasound probe. Seven months later, they each performed a "follow-up" mannikin trial with an identical setup. For each trial, sensors recorded participants' path length, translational motions, and rotational sum. Time was recorded for each trial as well. We defined skill retention as performance within 1 standard deviation or less of the entire cohort's average at baseline (threshold). We compared the number of residents who met the threshold, which indicated less excessive motion and therefore better performance, at baseline with the number at follow-up using McNemar's test across each metric for each sensor.

Results: For path length, translational motions, and rotational sum of the probe, significantly more residents met the threshold at baseline than at follow-up (P < .04). No significant differences were detected for any metrics of the dorsum or time.

Conclusions: Motion analysis can objectively assess skill decay in anesthesiology residents performing CVC placement. Residents exhibited skill retention in tasks involving their dominant hand and skill decay in tasks involving the ultrasound probe (nondominant hand).

目的评估训练后7个月的技能保留:中心静脉置管的运动分析。
背景:中心静脉导管(CVC)的放置是一项具有挑战性的技术。常规评估工具,包括检查清单和全球评级量表,需要主观的专家评估。我们假设,通过比较麻醉科住院医师在培训后和7个月后的表现,运动分析可以客观地评估CVC安置中的技能保留。方法:在学习如何在人体模型上放置CVC后,12名一年级麻醉学住院医师分别在其惯用手的背部和超声探头的底部使用电磁运动传感器进行了“基线”试验。七个月后,他们每个人都用相同的设置进行了一次“后续”人体模型试验。对于每个试验,传感器记录参与者的路径长度、平移运动和旋转总和。同时记录每次试验的时间。我们将技能留存定义为在基线(阈值)下整个队列平均水平的1个标准差以内的表现。我们使用McNemar的测试对每个传感器的每个指标进行了测试,比较了基线时达到阈值的居民人数,这表明过度运动较少,因此表现更好。结果:对于路径长度、平移运动和探针旋转总和,基线时达到阈值的居民明显多于随访时(P < .04)。在背侧或时间的任何指标上均未检测到显著差异。结论:运动分析可以客观评估麻醉住院医师进行CVC置入时的技能衰退。居民在涉及惯用手的任务中表现出技能保留,而在涉及超声探头(非惯用手)的任务中表现出技能衰退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信