Adaptive Servo-Ventilation for Treatment-Emergent Central Sleep Apnea: The READ-ASV Registry.

IF 5.4
Michael Arzt, Oliver Munt, Raphaela Kuebeck, Holger Woehrle, Raphael Heinzer, Adam V Benjafield, Jean-Louis Pepin
{"title":"Adaptive Servo-Ventilation for Treatment-Emergent Central Sleep Apnea: The READ-ASV Registry.","authors":"Michael Arzt, Oliver Munt, Raphaela Kuebeck, Holger Woehrle, Raphael Heinzer, Adam V Benjafield, Jean-Louis Pepin","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-210OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TE-CSA) is the most common indication for adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV). Evidence on the effects of TE-CSA treatment on quality of life (QoL) is limited. <b>Objectives:</b> To test the hypotheses that patients with TE-CSA who have cardiovascular disease (CVD) would be less symptomatic than those with CVD and that the beneficial effects of ASV on QoL/sleepiness might be smaller in individuals with versus without CVD. <b>Methods:</b> ASV-naive adults with TE-CSA and an ASV prescription were included in this analysis of the READ-ASV (Registry on the Treatment of Central and Complex Sleep-Disordered Breathing with ASV). QoL (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire [FOSQ]) and daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) were assessed at baseline and 12-month follow up. <b>Results:</b> Of 452 patients with TE-CSA, 81% had CVD. Before treatment initiation, FOSQ and ESS scores were better in those with versus without CVD. On ASV, in the CVD and no CVD subgroups, median (interquartile range) FOSQ score significantly increased (+0.72 [-0.20 to +1.98], <i>P</i> < 0.001 and +0.90 [-0.12 to +2.29], <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively), and the ESS score significantly decreased (-2.00 [-5.00 to 0.00], <i>P</i> < 0.001 and -3.00 [-6.75 to 0.00], <i>P</i> < 0.001); improvement magnitude was similar in both subgroups (<i>P</i> = 0.454 and <i>P</i> = 0.120). <b>Conclusions:</b> The majority of individuals with TE-CSA and an ASV therapy prescription had CVD. Although those with TE-CSA and CVD were less symptomatic than those without CVD, ASV had a positive effect on QoL and sleepiness in these individuals, as well as those without CVD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03032029).</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1546-1553"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-210OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TE-CSA) is the most common indication for adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV). Evidence on the effects of TE-CSA treatment on quality of life (QoL) is limited. Objectives: To test the hypotheses that patients with TE-CSA who have cardiovascular disease (CVD) would be less symptomatic than those with CVD and that the beneficial effects of ASV on QoL/sleepiness might be smaller in individuals with versus without CVD. Methods: ASV-naive adults with TE-CSA and an ASV prescription were included in this analysis of the READ-ASV (Registry on the Treatment of Central and Complex Sleep-Disordered Breathing with ASV). QoL (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire [FOSQ]) and daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) were assessed at baseline and 12-month follow up. Results: Of 452 patients with TE-CSA, 81% had CVD. Before treatment initiation, FOSQ and ESS scores were better in those with versus without CVD. On ASV, in the CVD and no CVD subgroups, median (interquartile range) FOSQ score significantly increased (+0.72 [-0.20 to +1.98], P < 0.001 and +0.90 [-0.12 to +2.29], P < 0.001, respectively), and the ESS score significantly decreased (-2.00 [-5.00 to 0.00], P < 0.001 and -3.00 [-6.75 to 0.00], P < 0.001); improvement magnitude was similar in both subgroups (P = 0.454 and P = 0.120). Conclusions: The majority of individuals with TE-CSA and an ASV therapy prescription had CVD. Although those with TE-CSA and CVD were less symptomatic than those without CVD, ASV had a positive effect on QoL and sleepiness in these individuals, as well as those without CVD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03032029).

自适应伺服通气治疗突发性中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停:READ-ASV注册。
理由:治疗突发性中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停(TE-CSA)是适应性伺服通气(ASV)最常见的适应症。TE-CSA治疗对生活质量(QoL)影响的证据有限。目的:验证有心血管疾病(CVD)的TE-CSA患者比有CVD的患者症状更轻的假设,以及ASV对生活质量/嗜睡的有益影响在有CVD的患者中可能比没有CVD的患者小。方法:ASV-naïve将TE-CSA和ASV处方的成人纳入ASV治疗中心和复杂睡眠呼吸障碍(READ-ASV)登记册的分析中。在基线和12个月的随访中评估QoL(睡眠功能结局问卷[FOSQ])和白天嗜睡(Epworth嗜睡量表[ESS])。测量结果和主要结果:452例TE-CSA患者中,81%患有CVD。治疗开始前,有心血管疾病患者的FOSQ和ESS评分优于无心血管疾病患者。在ASV中,在CVD和无CVD亚组中,中位数[四分位数范围]FOSQ评分显著升高(+0.72 [-0.20;结论:大多数TE-CSA和ASV治疗处方患者患有CVD。虽然有TE-CSA和CVD的患者比没有CVD的患者症状更轻,但ASV对这些个体以及没有CVD的个体的生活质量和嗜睡有积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信