Adaptive Servo-ventilation for Treatment-emergent Central Sleep Apnea: The READ-ASV Registry.

Michael Arzt, Oliver Munt, Raphaela Kubeck, Holger Woehrle, Raphael Heinzer, Adam V Benjafield, Jean-Louis Pepin
{"title":"Adaptive Servo-ventilation for Treatment-emergent Central Sleep Apnea: The READ-ASV Registry.","authors":"Michael Arzt, Oliver Munt, Raphaela Kubeck, Holger Woehrle, Raphael Heinzer, Adam V Benjafield, Jean-Louis Pepin","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-210OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TE-CSA) is the most common indication for adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV). Evidence on the effects of TE-CSA treatment on quality of life (QoL) is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To test the hypotheses that patients with TE-CSA who have cardiovascular disease (CVD) would be less symptomatic than those with CVD, and that the beneficial effects of ASV on QoL/sleepiness might be smaller in individuals with versus without CVD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ASV-naïve adults with TE-CSA and an ASV prescription were included in this analysis of the Registry on the Treatment of Central and Complex Sleep-Disordered Breathing with ASV (READ-ASV). QoL (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire [FOSQ] and daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) were assessed at baseline and 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Of 452 TE-CSA patients, 81% had CVD. Before treatment initiation FOSQ and ESS scores were better in those with versus without CVD. On ASV, in the CVD and no CVD subgroups, median [interquartile range] FOSQ score significantly increased (+0.72 [-0.20; +1.98], p<0.001 and +0.90 [-0.12; +2.29], p<0.001, respectively) and the ESS score significantly decreased (-2.00 [-5.00; 0.00], p<0.001 and -3.00 [-6.75; 0.00], p<0.001); improvement magnitude was similar in both subgroups (p=0.454 and p=0.120).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of individuals with TE-CSA and an ASV therapy prescription had CVD. Although those with TE-CSA and CVD were less symptomatic than those without CVD, ASV had a positive effect on QoL and sleepiness in these individuals, as well as those without CVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202502-210OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TE-CSA) is the most common indication for adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV). Evidence on the effects of TE-CSA treatment on quality of life (QoL) is limited.

Objectives: To test the hypotheses that patients with TE-CSA who have cardiovascular disease (CVD) would be less symptomatic than those with CVD, and that the beneficial effects of ASV on QoL/sleepiness might be smaller in individuals with versus without CVD.

Methods: ASV-naïve adults with TE-CSA and an ASV prescription were included in this analysis of the Registry on the Treatment of Central and Complex Sleep-Disordered Breathing with ASV (READ-ASV). QoL (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire [FOSQ] and daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) were assessed at baseline and 12-month follow-up.

Measurements and main results: Of 452 TE-CSA patients, 81% had CVD. Before treatment initiation FOSQ and ESS scores were better in those with versus without CVD. On ASV, in the CVD and no CVD subgroups, median [interquartile range] FOSQ score significantly increased (+0.72 [-0.20; +1.98], p<0.001 and +0.90 [-0.12; +2.29], p<0.001, respectively) and the ESS score significantly decreased (-2.00 [-5.00; 0.00], p<0.001 and -3.00 [-6.75; 0.00], p<0.001); improvement magnitude was similar in both subgroups (p=0.454 and p=0.120).

Conclusions: The majority of individuals with TE-CSA and an ASV therapy prescription had CVD. Although those with TE-CSA and CVD were less symptomatic than those without CVD, ASV had a positive effect on QoL and sleepiness in these individuals, as well as those without CVD.

自适应伺服通气治疗突发性中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停:READ-ASV注册。
理由:治疗突发性中枢性睡眠呼吸暂停(TE-CSA)是适应性伺服通气(ASV)最常见的适应症。TE-CSA治疗对生活质量(QoL)影响的证据有限。目的:验证有心血管疾病(CVD)的TE-CSA患者比有CVD的患者症状更轻的假设,以及ASV对生活质量/嗜睡的有益影响在有CVD的患者中可能比没有CVD的患者小。方法:ASV-naïve将TE-CSA和ASV处方的成人纳入ASV治疗中心和复杂睡眠呼吸障碍(READ-ASV)登记册的分析中。在基线和12个月的随访中评估QoL(睡眠功能结局问卷[FOSQ])和白天嗜睡(Epworth嗜睡量表[ESS])。测量结果和主要结果:452例TE-CSA患者中,81%患有CVD。治疗开始前,有心血管疾病患者的FOSQ和ESS评分优于无心血管疾病患者。在ASV中,在CVD和无CVD亚组中,中位数[四分位数范围]FOSQ评分显著升高(+0.72 [-0.20;结论:大多数TE-CSA和ASV治疗处方患者患有CVD。虽然有TE-CSA和CVD的患者比没有CVD的患者症状更轻,但ASV对这些个体以及没有CVD的个体的生活质量和嗜睡有积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信