Test-retest reliability of Cirrus HD-optical coherence tomography retinal layer thickness measurements in people with multiple sclerosis.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anna Bacchetti, Brenna McCormack, Ting-Yi Lin, Rozita Doosti, Gelareh Ahmadi, Omar Ezzedin, Nicole Pellegrini, Evan Johnson, Anna Kim, Gabriel Otero-Duran, Devon J Bonair, Elle Lawrence, Ernest Lievers, Simidele Davis, Sooyeon Park, Madeline Inserra, Ananya Gulati, Kathryn C Fitzgerald, Elias S Sotirchos, Peter A Calabresi, Shiv Saidha
{"title":"Test-retest reliability of Cirrus HD-optical coherence tomography retinal layer thickness measurements in people with multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Anna Bacchetti, Brenna McCormack, Ting-Yi Lin, Rozita Doosti, Gelareh Ahmadi, Omar Ezzedin, Nicole Pellegrini, Evan Johnson, Anna Kim, Gabriel Otero-Duran, Devon J Bonair, Elle Lawrence, Ernest Lievers, Simidele Davis, Sooyeon Park, Madeline Inserra, Ananya Gulati, Kathryn C Fitzgerald, Elias S Sotirchos, Peter A Calabresi, Shiv Saidha","doi":"10.1177/20552173251340957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows evaluation of inter-eye differences (IEDs) in peri-papillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses to identify unilateral optic nerve involvement (UONI), which is included in the 2024 revised McDonald diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the test-retest reliability of pRNFL and GCIPL thicknesses/IEDs in people with MS, other neurological disorders, and healthy controls using Cirrus HD-OCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>509 participants underwent Cirrus HD-OCT, acquiring two macular and optic disc scans per eye within each session. Scans meeting OSCAR-IB quality control criteria were included in final analyses (959 eyes), with no clinical/demographic exclusions (reflecting a real-world clinical setting). Reliability was assessed using coefficients of variation (COVs), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA). IED consistency was evaluated using difference-in-differences (DiDs) of test-retest measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GCIPL demonstrated superior reliability (ICC: 0.998, COV: 0.40%, LOA: -1.29 to 1.35 μm) to pRNFL (ICC: 0.989, COV: 1.18%, LOA: -3.59 to 3.70 μm) thickness. Inter-eye absolute DiDs [pRNFL: 2.00 μm (standard deviation (SD) 1.73); GCIPL: 0.64 μm (SD 0.67)] were lower than IED thresholds proposed for identifying UONI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The excellent reliability of GCIPL and pRNFL thicknesses/IEDs support OCT for identifying UONI to diagnose MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18961,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","volume":"11 2","pages":"20552173251340957"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12066860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173251340957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows evaluation of inter-eye differences (IEDs) in peri-papillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses to identify unilateral optic nerve involvement (UONI), which is included in the 2024 revised McDonald diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS).

Objectives: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of pRNFL and GCIPL thicknesses/IEDs in people with MS, other neurological disorders, and healthy controls using Cirrus HD-OCT.

Methods: 509 participants underwent Cirrus HD-OCT, acquiring two macular and optic disc scans per eye within each session. Scans meeting OSCAR-IB quality control criteria were included in final analyses (959 eyes), with no clinical/demographic exclusions (reflecting a real-world clinical setting). Reliability was assessed using coefficients of variation (COVs), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA). IED consistency was evaluated using difference-in-differences (DiDs) of test-retest measurements.

Results: GCIPL demonstrated superior reliability (ICC: 0.998, COV: 0.40%, LOA: -1.29 to 1.35 μm) to pRNFL (ICC: 0.989, COV: 1.18%, LOA: -3.59 to 3.70 μm) thickness. Inter-eye absolute DiDs [pRNFL: 2.00 μm (standard deviation (SD) 1.73); GCIPL: 0.64 μm (SD 0.67)] were lower than IED thresholds proposed for identifying UONI.

Conclusions: The excellent reliability of GCIPL and pRNFL thicknesses/IEDs support OCT for identifying UONI to diagnose MS.

Cirrus hd光学相干断层扫描视网膜层厚度测量在多发性硬化症患者中的测试-重测可靠性。
背景:光学相干断层扫描(OCT)可以评估乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层(pRNFL)和黄斑神经节细胞-内丛状层(GCIPL)厚度的眼间差异(IEDs),以识别单侧视神经受累(UONI),这被纳入2024年修订的多发性硬化症(MS)麦克唐纳诊断标准。目的:利用Cirrus HD-OCT评估MS、其他神经系统疾病患者和健康对照者pRNFL和GCIPL厚度/ ids的重测信度。方法:509名参与者接受了Cirrus HD-OCT,在每次治疗中每只眼睛进行两次黄斑和视盘扫描。符合OSCAR-IB质量控制标准的扫描纳入最终分析(959只眼睛),没有临床/人口统计学排除(反映现实世界的临床环境)。采用变异系数(COVs)、类内相关系数(ICCs)和Bland-Altman一致限(LOA)评估可靠性。使用重测测量的差中差(DiDs)评估IED一致性。结果:GCIPL对pRNFL厚度(ICC: 0.989, COV: 1.18%, LOA: -3.59 ~ 3.70 μm)具有较好的信度(ICC: 0.998, COV: 0.40%, LOA: -1.29 ~ 1.35 μm)。眼间绝对DiDs [pRNFL: 2.00 μm(标准差(SD) 1.73);GCIPL: 0.64 μm (SD 0.67)]低于IED提出的鉴别UONI的阈值。结论:GCIPL和pRNFL厚度/IEDs具有良好的可靠性,支持OCT鉴别UONI诊断MS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信