Jennifer P Wisdom, Nancy Yanchus, Mira Brancu, Susan Drevo, Megan Mack, Katerine Osatuke
{"title":"Learning from the best: A positive deviance approach to Veterans Health Administration leadership practices.","authors":"Jennifer P Wisdom, Nancy Yanchus, Mira Brancu, Susan Drevo, Megan Mack, Katerine Osatuke","doi":"10.1037/ser0000951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health care organization leaders are charged with patient safety, evidence-based practice, financial sustainability, capacity, and staff supervision in systems that are challenged by bureaucracy, fragmentation, mistrust, and limited interdisciplinary engagement. It is not known how leaders effectively address specific challenges of staff supervision, policies/mandates, difficult conversations, and staff burnout. This study collected strategies from high-performing leaders in the Veterans Health Administration to understand how they approach these challenges. Applying a positive deviance approach to examine organizational survey data across the entire administration, we first statistically identified Veterans Health Administration sites that, based on employee feedback, showed the greatest organizational health improvements from 2022. These sites' chiefs of staff (<i>N</i> = 24) were then interviewed about how they approached four specific challenges. Findings indicate commonalities across these leaders' best practices, including creating opportunities for dialogue, building a culture of learning and psychological safety, proactively addressing process improvements, supporting work-life balance, leading with grace and courage, and maximizing and protecting resources. Public sector health care leaders may benefit from this approach to learning from these highest performers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000951","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Health care organization leaders are charged with patient safety, evidence-based practice, financial sustainability, capacity, and staff supervision in systems that are challenged by bureaucracy, fragmentation, mistrust, and limited interdisciplinary engagement. It is not known how leaders effectively address specific challenges of staff supervision, policies/mandates, difficult conversations, and staff burnout. This study collected strategies from high-performing leaders in the Veterans Health Administration to understand how they approach these challenges. Applying a positive deviance approach to examine organizational survey data across the entire administration, we first statistically identified Veterans Health Administration sites that, based on employee feedback, showed the greatest organizational health improvements from 2022. These sites' chiefs of staff (N = 24) were then interviewed about how they approached four specific challenges. Findings indicate commonalities across these leaders' best practices, including creating opportunities for dialogue, building a culture of learning and psychological safety, proactively addressing process improvements, supporting work-life balance, leading with grace and courage, and maximizing and protecting resources. Public sector health care leaders may benefit from this approach to learning from these highest performers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.