An Analysis of Regional Blocks During Enzymatic Debridement of Burns.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Zoey Chasen, Justin Suarez, Alexander Kurjatko
{"title":"An Analysis of Regional Blocks During Enzymatic Debridement of Burns.","authors":"Zoey Chasen, Justin Suarez, Alexander Kurjatko","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anacaulase is a mixture of enzymes used for the breakdown of eschar in patients with deep partial- or full-thickness burns up to 20% of the body's surface area. European consensus guidelines recommend regional anesthesia of an isolated extremity undergoing enzymatic debridement, but no North American consensus has been reached. Our practice has shifted from a multimodal pain strategy to utilize regional blocks prior to the application of anacaulase. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the introduction of regional blocks improved pain control in patients receiving anacaulase therapy. This is a single-center retrospective comparative study evaluating all patients who received anacaulase from July 2016 to July 2024. Continuous data was evaluated via the Wilcoxon rank sum test and categorical data was evaluated via the chi-square test of independence. In the prespecified period, 47 patients received anacaulase and were included for analysis. Of the 47 patients, 24 (51.1%) underwent regional block. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics except lower baseline opioid requirements in the regional block group. Pain scores during anacaulase application were significantly lower in patients that received regional blocks (4.5 vs 7, P = .003). There was no difference in change in opioid requirements or requirement of adjunct medications except for dexmedetomidine requirements (0% vs 78.3%, P < .001). Our data suggest that regional blocks were associated with lower pain scores in burn patients receiving anacaulase therapy but did not result in a change in opioid requirements from baseline. Regional blocks may be an effective strategy in this population to reduce pain from enzymatic debridement, but prospective studies would be warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"1012-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anacaulase is a mixture of enzymes used for the breakdown of eschar in patients with deep partial- or full-thickness burns up to 20% of the body's surface area. European consensus guidelines recommend regional anesthesia of an isolated extremity undergoing enzymatic debridement, but no North American consensus has been reached. Our practice has shifted from a multimodal pain strategy to utilize regional blocks prior to the application of anacaulase. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the introduction of regional blocks improved pain control in patients receiving anacaulase therapy. This is a single-center retrospective comparative study evaluating all patients who received anacaulase from July 2016 to July 2024. Continuous data was evaluated via the Wilcoxon rank sum test and categorical data was evaluated via the chi-square test of independence. In the prespecified period, 47 patients received anacaulase and were included for analysis. Of the 47 patients, 24 (51.1%) underwent regional block. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics except lower baseline opioid requirements in the regional block group. Pain scores during anacaulase application were significantly lower in patients that received regional blocks (4.5 vs 7, P = .003). There was no difference in change in opioid requirements or requirement of adjunct medications except for dexmedetomidine requirements (0% vs 78.3%, P < .001). Our data suggest that regional blocks were associated with lower pain scores in burn patients receiving anacaulase therapy but did not result in a change in opioid requirements from baseline. Regional blocks may be an effective strategy in this population to reduce pain from enzymatic debridement, but prospective studies would be warranted.

烧伤酶清创过程中局部阻滞的分析。
假药酶是一种酶的混合物,用于烧伤面积达体表面积20%的患者的部分或全层烧伤。欧洲的共识指南推荐对孤立肢体进行酶清创的局部麻醉,但北美尚未达成共识。我们的实践已经从多模态疼痛策略转变为在应用麻醉剂之前利用局部阻滞。本研究的目的是确定引入局部阻滞是否能改善接受阿那克酶治疗的患者的疼痛控制。这是一项单中心回顾性比较研究,评估了2016年7月至2024年7月期间接受anaculase治疗的所有患者。连续资料采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,分类资料采用卡方独立性检验。在预先规定的时间内,47例患者接受了阿那库酶治疗,并纳入分析。47例患者中,24例(51.1%)行局部阻滞。除了区域阻断组的基线阿片类药物需求较低外,基线特征没有显着差异。在anacaulase应用期间,接受局部阻滞的患者疼痛评分明显较低(4.5 vs 7, p=0.003)。除了右美托咪定的需求外,阿片类药物的需求或辅助药物的需求的变化没有差异(0% vs 78.3%, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信