Neuro-ophthalmological findings in pediatric ventricular shunt failure: a systematic review.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Soren Jonzzon, Anthony Price, Nina Truong, Robert P Naftel, Paul H Phillips, John C Wellons, Albert M Isaacs
{"title":"Neuro-ophthalmological findings in pediatric ventricular shunt failure: a systematic review.","authors":"Soren Jonzzon, Anthony Price, Nina Truong, Robert P Naftel, Paul H Phillips, John C Wellons, Albert M Isaacs","doi":"10.3171/2024.12.PEDS24397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A hallmark feature of failed ventriculoperitoneal shunts in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus is raised intracranial pressure, necessitating immediate shunt revision or temporization to prevent significant morbidity and mortality. Neuro-ophthalmological findings (NOFs) are essential objective indicators for diagnosing shunt failure, which include papilledema, vision loss, optic disc pallor, and disturbances in ocular motility and alignment. These NOFs are also invaluable for long-term follow-up and monitoring of the progression and treatment response in hydrocephalus. However, there are nuances in their sensitivity and specificity regarding shunt failure. This study presents a systematic review of the literature on the clinical correlation between NOFs and shunt failure and their responses following treatment for hydrocephalus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature focused on the association between NOFs and shunt failure was conducted according to established guidelines. Data were extracted from studies that included patients < 21 years of age with confirmed shunt failure and reported NOFs. Shunt failure was only considered if surgery confirmed the diagnosis. Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and those with ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure without documented prerevision assessment of NOFs were excluded. Descriptive statistics were reported, including percentages for categorical variables and means for continuous variables. The risk of bias was assessed for each study. A common-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates and account for study variances, with heterogeneity assessed using the I2 statistic. Forest plots illustrated the prevalence of NOFs, overall rates, 95% confidence intervals, and contributing weights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies with 82 patients had surgically confirmed shunt failures, of whom 51 (62%) exhibited NOFs, including 17 (21%) with papilledema, 11 (13%) with cranial nerve palsy, 9 (11%) with upgaze palsy, and 14 (17%) with vision loss. Concomitant neurological symptoms were noted in 20 (24%) of those patients, including headaches (15%), nausea/vomiting (10%), and lethargy or neurological symptoms (13%). Following shunt revision, improvement in papilledema was reported in 83% of affected patients, and 92% in those with cranial nerve or upgaze palsy, but no improvement was observed in visual acuity. The overall weighted prevalence of papilledema was 30% (95% CI 0.07-0.70; I2 = 67%, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings advocate for the integration of neuro-ophthalmological evaluations in addition to radiographic and clinical assessments to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of shunt failures in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach can augment diagnostic precision and potentially hasten the initiation of treatment for these complex and often nuanced pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.12.PEDS24397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A hallmark feature of failed ventriculoperitoneal shunts in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus is raised intracranial pressure, necessitating immediate shunt revision or temporization to prevent significant morbidity and mortality. Neuro-ophthalmological findings (NOFs) are essential objective indicators for diagnosing shunt failure, which include papilledema, vision loss, optic disc pallor, and disturbances in ocular motility and alignment. These NOFs are also invaluable for long-term follow-up and monitoring of the progression and treatment response in hydrocephalus. However, there are nuances in their sensitivity and specificity regarding shunt failure. This study presents a systematic review of the literature on the clinical correlation between NOFs and shunt failure and their responses following treatment for hydrocephalus.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature focused on the association between NOFs and shunt failure was conducted according to established guidelines. Data were extracted from studies that included patients < 21 years of age with confirmed shunt failure and reported NOFs. Shunt failure was only considered if surgery confirmed the diagnosis. Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and those with ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure without documented prerevision assessment of NOFs were excluded. Descriptive statistics were reported, including percentages for categorical variables and means for continuous variables. The risk of bias was assessed for each study. A common-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates and account for study variances, with heterogeneity assessed using the I2 statistic. Forest plots illustrated the prevalence of NOFs, overall rates, 95% confidence intervals, and contributing weights.

Results: Four studies with 82 patients had surgically confirmed shunt failures, of whom 51 (62%) exhibited NOFs, including 17 (21%) with papilledema, 11 (13%) with cranial nerve palsy, 9 (11%) with upgaze palsy, and 14 (17%) with vision loss. Concomitant neurological symptoms were noted in 20 (24%) of those patients, including headaches (15%), nausea/vomiting (10%), and lethargy or neurological symptoms (13%). Following shunt revision, improvement in papilledema was reported in 83% of affected patients, and 92% in those with cranial nerve or upgaze palsy, but no improvement was observed in visual acuity. The overall weighted prevalence of papilledema was 30% (95% CI 0.07-0.70; I2 = 67%, p = 0.03).

Conclusions: These findings advocate for the integration of neuro-ophthalmological evaluations in addition to radiographic and clinical assessments to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of shunt failures in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach can augment diagnostic precision and potentially hasten the initiation of treatment for these complex and often nuanced pathologies.

小儿心室分流管衰竭的神经眼科发现:一项系统综述。
目的:脑积水患儿脑室-腹膜分流术失败的一个显著特征是颅内压升高,需要立即对分流术进行翻修或暂时修复,以防止显著的发病率和死亡率。神经眼科检查结果(NOFs)是诊断分流功能衰竭必不可少的客观指标,包括乳头水肿、视力丧失、视盘苍白、眼球运动和对齐障碍。这些NOFs对于长期随访和监测脑积水的进展和治疗反应也是非常宝贵的。然而,它们对分流失败的敏感性和特异性有细微差别。本研究对脑积水治疗后NOFs与分流管失效的临床关系及其反应的文献进行系统回顾。方法:根据已建立的指南,对NOFs与分流失败之间关系的文献进行系统回顾。数据摘自以下研究:年龄< 21岁、确认分流管衰竭和报告NOFs的患者。只有手术证实了诊断,才会考虑分流失败。排除了特发性颅内高压患者和脑室-腹膜分流管衰竭患者,但未记录NOFs的术前评估。报告了描述性统计,包括分类变量的百分比和连续变量的平均值。对每项研究的偏倚风险进行评估。使用共同效应模型计算汇总估计并解释研究差异,使用I2统计量评估异质性。森林图显示了NOFs的患病率、总体比率、95%置信区间和贡献权重。结果:4项研究共82例患者手术证实分流失败,其中51例(62%)表现为NOFs,包括17例(21%)乳头水肿,11例(13%)脑神经麻痹,9例(11%)上视麻痹,14例(17%)视力丧失。其中20例(24%)患者伴有神经系统症状,包括头痛(15%)、恶心/呕吐(10%)、嗜睡或神经系统症状(13%)。分流术翻修后,83%的患者乳头水肿得到改善,脑神经或上视性麻痹患者的这一比例为92%,但视力没有改善。乳头水肿的总加权患病率为30% (95% CI 0.07-0.70;I2 = 67%, p = 0.03)。结论:这些发现提倡在影像学和临床评估的基础上结合神经眼科评估,以提高小儿脑积水患者分流管失效的诊断准确性。采用多学科方法可以提高诊断精度,并有可能加快对这些复杂且往往细微差别的病理的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信