Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Models for Nutritional Symptom Management in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Şenay Burçin Alkan, Elif Didem Örs Demet
{"title":"Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Models for Nutritional Symptom Management in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.","authors":"Şenay Burçin Alkan, Elif Didem Örs Demet","doi":"10.1080/01635581.2025.2499160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study is to determine if artificial intelligence (AI) models could provide dietary recommendations to manage chemotherapy-induced nutritional symptoms in breast cancer (BC) patients that are on comparable levels with the American Cancer Society, National Cancer Institute and World Cancer Research Fund guidelines which were used as evidence-based recommendation. The AI models-ChatGPT, ChatGPT 4.0, Gemini, Gemini Advanced, Copilot, and Copilot Pro-were evaluated based on their adherence to the guidelines. Specific queries were posed to each model, and the generated responses were rated by two experienced dietitians using a 5-point likert scale. Gemini provided the most adherent recommendations for metallic taste in mouth, while Gemini Advanced excelled in managing dehydration. ChatGPT and Gemini Advanced were the most effective in addressing heartburn, and Copilot Pro consistently showed the lowest performance across most symptoms. Overall, ChatGPT 4.0 attained the highest total score, followed by Copilot and Gemini, indicating a general trend where certain models were better suited for specific symptoms. Various AI models (e.g. ChatGPT 4.0) show potential in addressing certain chemotherapy-induced symptoms, but they do not consistently align with evidence-based recommendations. Improvement of AI models is necessary for their adherence to evidence-based recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54701,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Cancer-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2025.2499160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine if artificial intelligence (AI) models could provide dietary recommendations to manage chemotherapy-induced nutritional symptoms in breast cancer (BC) patients that are on comparable levels with the American Cancer Society, National Cancer Institute and World Cancer Research Fund guidelines which were used as evidence-based recommendation. The AI models-ChatGPT, ChatGPT 4.0, Gemini, Gemini Advanced, Copilot, and Copilot Pro-were evaluated based on their adherence to the guidelines. Specific queries were posed to each model, and the generated responses were rated by two experienced dietitians using a 5-point likert scale. Gemini provided the most adherent recommendations for metallic taste in mouth, while Gemini Advanced excelled in managing dehydration. ChatGPT and Gemini Advanced were the most effective in addressing heartburn, and Copilot Pro consistently showed the lowest performance across most symptoms. Overall, ChatGPT 4.0 attained the highest total score, followed by Copilot and Gemini, indicating a general trend where certain models were better suited for specific symptoms. Various AI models (e.g. ChatGPT 4.0) show potential in addressing certain chemotherapy-induced symptoms, but they do not consistently align with evidence-based recommendations. Improvement of AI models is necessary for their adherence to evidence-based recommendations.

人工智能模型对乳腺癌化疗患者营养症状管理的评价
该研究的目的是确定人工智能(AI)模型是否可以提供饮食建议,以管理乳腺癌(BC)患者化疗引起的营养症状,这些建议与美国癌症协会、国家癌症研究所和世界癌症研究基金会的指南水平相当,这些指南被用作循证建议。人工智能模型——ChatGPT、ChatGPT 4.0、Gemini、Gemini Advanced、Copilot和Copilot pro——根据它们对指南的遵守程度进行了评估。对每个模型提出了具体的问题,并由两位经验丰富的营养师使用5分李克特量表对生成的回答进行评分。Gemini提供了最坚持的口腔金属味建议,而Gemini Advanced在处理脱水方面表现出色。ChatGPT和Gemini Advanced在解决胃灼热方面最有效,而Copilot Pro在大多数症状中表现最差。总体而言,ChatGPT 4.0获得了最高的总分,其次是Copilot和Gemini,这表明某些模型更适合特定症状的总体趋势。各种人工智能模型(例如ChatGPT 4.0)在解决某些化疗引起的症状方面显示出潜力,但它们与循证建议并不一致。改进人工智能模型对于它们遵循循证建议是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: This timely publication reports and reviews current findings on the effects of nutrition on the etiology, therapy, and prevention of cancer. Etiological issues include clinical and experimental research in nutrition, carcinogenesis, epidemiology, biochemistry, and molecular biology. Coverage of therapy focuses on research in clinical nutrition and oncology, dietetics, and bioengineering. Prevention approaches include public health recommendations, preventative medicine, behavior modification, education, functional foods, and agricultural and food production policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信