Reporting the Degree of Certainty of CSF-Venous Fistulas in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: The Duke CSF-Venous Fistula Confidence Score.

Timothy J Amrhein, Daphne Zhu, Linda Gray, Kayla W Kilpatrick, Al Erkanli, Jay Willhite, Michael D Malinzak, Peter G Kranz
{"title":"Reporting the Degree of Certainty of CSF-Venous Fistulas in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: The Duke CSF-Venous Fistula Confidence Score.","authors":"Timothy J Amrhein, Daphne Zhu, Linda Gray, Kayla W Kilpatrick, Al Erkanli, Jay Willhite, Michael D Malinzak, Peter G Kranz","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>CSF-venous fistulas (CVFs) are a common cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). CVF identification and localization are critical for diagnosis and treatment, but inconsistent visualization of CVFs on myelography leads to diagnostic uncertainty. Diagnostic confidence impacts treatment decisions. However, there is currently no standardized method for reporting the degree of confidence about the presence or absence of a CVF on CT myelography (CTM). The purposes of this study are to present a novel instrument to provide structured communication of the degree of certainty about the presence of a CVF, and to determine the inter-reader and intra-reader agreement of this scoring system for determining the presence of a CVF at a given spinal level on CTMs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study assessed the inter-reader and intra-reader reproducibility of a scoring system anchored in previously reported objective imaging findings, including the attenuation of paraspinal veins associated with CVFs. We included CTMs from patients with SIH performed between 10/2017-03/2024 at one institution. Exclusion criteria were CSF leak other than CVF, prior transvenous embolization, and non-diagnostic CTMs. Several potential iterations of the scoring system were developed. The study cohort consisted of a balanced set of cases representative of varying degrees of certainty: definite, high probability, low probability, and negative (25 each). Five radiologists (3-19 years experience) provided their blinded subjective confidence assessment and then applied the scoring system. Inter-reader and intra-reader agreements were calculated for the different scoring system models using kappa statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best-performing model produced substantial mean intra-reader agreement, closely approximated the number of definite CVFs, and was adopted as the final model. Inter-reader agreement for the adopted model was moderate, replicating that for the subjective interpretations. Other versions of the model produced fair-to-moderate inter-reader agreements and were not adopted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a structured reporting system anchored in objective imaging findings that communicates the degree of certainty about the presence of CVF on CTM. This system replicates assessments by expert readers and meets a critical need for improved communication both in daily clinical practice and in research by providing a method for objectively quantifying the certainty of CVF diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>CTM = CT myelography; CVF = CSF-venous fistula; DCCS = Duke CSF-Venous Fistula Confidence Score; DSM = digital subtraction myelography; EBP = epidural blood patching; HPVS = Hyperdense paraspinal vein sign; SIH = Spontaneous intracranial hypotension; TVE = transvenous embolization.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: CSF-venous fistulas (CVFs) are a common cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). CVF identification and localization are critical for diagnosis and treatment, but inconsistent visualization of CVFs on myelography leads to diagnostic uncertainty. Diagnostic confidence impacts treatment decisions. However, there is currently no standardized method for reporting the degree of confidence about the presence or absence of a CVF on CT myelography (CTM). The purposes of this study are to present a novel instrument to provide structured communication of the degree of certainty about the presence of a CVF, and to determine the inter-reader and intra-reader agreement of this scoring system for determining the presence of a CVF at a given spinal level on CTMs.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study assessed the inter-reader and intra-reader reproducibility of a scoring system anchored in previously reported objective imaging findings, including the attenuation of paraspinal veins associated with CVFs. We included CTMs from patients with SIH performed between 10/2017-03/2024 at one institution. Exclusion criteria were CSF leak other than CVF, prior transvenous embolization, and non-diagnostic CTMs. Several potential iterations of the scoring system were developed. The study cohort consisted of a balanced set of cases representative of varying degrees of certainty: definite, high probability, low probability, and negative (25 each). Five radiologists (3-19 years experience) provided their blinded subjective confidence assessment and then applied the scoring system. Inter-reader and intra-reader agreements were calculated for the different scoring system models using kappa statistics.

Results: The best-performing model produced substantial mean intra-reader agreement, closely approximated the number of definite CVFs, and was adopted as the final model. Inter-reader agreement for the adopted model was moderate, replicating that for the subjective interpretations. Other versions of the model produced fair-to-moderate inter-reader agreements and were not adopted.

Conclusions: We developed a structured reporting system anchored in objective imaging findings that communicates the degree of certainty about the presence of CVF on CTM. This system replicates assessments by expert readers and meets a critical need for improved communication both in daily clinical practice and in research by providing a method for objectively quantifying the certainty of CVF diagnosis.

Abbreviations: CTM = CT myelography; CVF = CSF-venous fistula; DCCS = Duke CSF-Venous Fistula Confidence Score; DSM = digital subtraction myelography; EBP = epidural blood patching; HPVS = Hyperdense paraspinal vein sign; SIH = Spontaneous intracranial hypotension; TVE = transvenous embolization.

报告自发性颅内低血压患者csf -静脉瘘的确定性程度:Duke csf -静脉瘘置信度评分
背景和目的:csf -静脉瘘(CVFs)是自发性颅内低血压(SIH)的常见原因。CVF的识别和定位对诊断和治疗至关重要,但脊髓造影显示的CVF不一致导致诊断的不确定性。诊断信心影响治疗决策。然而,目前还没有标准化的方法来报告CT脊髓造影(CTM)上是否存在CVF的置信度。本研究的目的是提出一种新的仪器,以提供关于CVF存在的确定性程度的结构化交流,并确定该评分系统在CTMs上确定给定脊柱水平上CVF存在的阅读器之间和阅读器内部的一致性。材料和方法:本回顾性研究评估了基于先前报道的客观成像结果的评分系统的读写器间和读写器内的可重复性,包括与CVFs相关的椎旁静脉的衰减。我们纳入了2017年10月至2024年3月间在一家机构进行的SIH患者的ctm。排除标准为除CVF外的脑脊液泄漏、既往经静脉栓塞和非诊断性CTMs。评分系统的几个潜在迭代被开发出来。研究队列由一组平衡的病例组成,这些病例具有不同程度的确定性:确定、高概率、低概率和阴性(各25例)。5名放射科医生(3-19年经验)提供了他们的盲目主观信心评估,然后应用评分系统。使用kappa统计计算不同评分系统模型的读者间和读者内协议。结果:表现最好的模型产生了大量的平均读者内一致性,非常接近确定CVFs的数量,并被采用为最终模型。读者间对所采用模型的认同程度适中,与主观解释的认同程度相同。该模型的其他版本产生了公平至适度的读者间协议,但未被采用。结论:我们开发了一个结构化的报告系统,该系统以客观成像结果为基础,传达了CTM上CVF存在的确定性程度。该系统复制了专家读者的评估,并通过提供客观量化CVF诊断确定性的方法,满足了日常临床实践和研究中改善沟通的关键需求。缩写:CTM = CT脊髓造影;CVF = csf -静脉瘘;Duke csf -静脉瘘置信度评分;数字减影脊髓造影术;硬膜外补血;高密度椎旁静脉征象;自发性颅内低血压;经静脉栓塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信