Comparison of Effectivity and Safety of Olanzapine and Mirtazapine on Cancer-Associated Anorexia and Cachexia in Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer Patients: Prospective, Comparative, Interventional Study.

IF 1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yogendra Singhal, Surendra Kumar Pingoliya, Pavan Gaurav R, Sreeharsh Saji, Amit Sharma
{"title":"Comparison of Effectivity and Safety of Olanzapine and Mirtazapine on Cancer-Associated Anorexia and Cachexia in Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer Patients: Prospective, Comparative, Interventional Study.","authors":"Yogendra Singhal, Surendra Kumar Pingoliya, Pavan Gaurav R, Sreeharsh Saji, Amit Sharma","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2492801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer-associated cachexia-anorexia syndrome (CACS) significantly affects patients' quality of life, leading to weight loss, muscle wasting, and reduced treatment response. This prospective study aimed to evaluate effectiveness of olanzapine versus mirtazapine in managing CACS. Primary objective was to assess their impact on body weight and appetite, while the secondary objective focused on psychological distress and sleep. A total of 152 patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 76 patients each. Group O received Tablet Olanzapine 5 mg/day orally; Group M received Tablet Mirtazapine 15 mg/day orally at bed time. All patients were assessed by using Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ) score and weight at time of first visit then follow-up visit at 2nd and 4th weeks. At 2nd week, the mean change in SNAQ score was 3.14 in Group M compared to 2.04 in Group O (<i>p</i> = 0.035). By the 4th week, it was 3.86 in Group M and 2.87 in Group O (<i>p</i> = 0.006). Weight changes increased from 45.57 to 46.81 kg in Group M and from 45.97 to 46.90 kg in Group O by 4th week (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.5). Both mirtazapine and olanzapine significantly increased appetite without notable weight gain. Mirtazapine showed stronger effects on appetite, sleep, anxiety, and depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"432-441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2492801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer-associated cachexia-anorexia syndrome (CACS) significantly affects patients' quality of life, leading to weight loss, muscle wasting, and reduced treatment response. This prospective study aimed to evaluate effectiveness of olanzapine versus mirtazapine in managing CACS. Primary objective was to assess their impact on body weight and appetite, while the secondary objective focused on psychological distress and sleep. A total of 152 patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 76 patients each. Group O received Tablet Olanzapine 5 mg/day orally; Group M received Tablet Mirtazapine 15 mg/day orally at bed time. All patients were assessed by using Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ) score and weight at time of first visit then follow-up visit at 2nd and 4th weeks. At 2nd week, the mean change in SNAQ score was 3.14 in Group M compared to 2.04 in Group O (p = 0.035). By the 4th week, it was 3.86 in Group M and 2.87 in Group O (p = 0.006). Weight changes increased from 45.57 to 46.81 kg in Group M and from 45.97 to 46.90 kg in Group O by 4th week (p ≥ 0.5). Both mirtazapine and olanzapine significantly increased appetite without notable weight gain. Mirtazapine showed stronger effects on appetite, sleep, anxiety, and depression.

奥氮平和米氮平治疗晚期口腔癌患者癌症相关性厌食症和恶病质的有效性和安全性比较:前瞻性、对比性、介入性研究。
癌症相关恶病质-厌食症综合征(CACS)显著影响患者的生活质量,导致体重减轻、肌肉萎缩和治疗反应降低。这项前瞻性研究旨在评估奥氮平与米氮平治疗CACS的有效性。主要目的是评估它们对体重和食欲的影响,而次要目的是关注心理困扰和睡眠。152例患者随机分为两组,每组76例。O组患者口服奥氮平片5 mg/d;M组患者给予米氮平片15 mg/d,睡前口服。采用简易营养食欲问卷(SNAQ)评分和体重对患者进行首次访视,第2周和第4周随访。第2周时,M组SNAQ评分的平均变化为3.14,O组为2.04,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.035)。第4周时,M组为3.86,O组为2.87 (p = 0.006)。第4周时,M组体重变化由45.57 ~ 46.81 kg, O组由45.97 ~ 46.90 kg (p≥0.5)。米氮平和奥氮平都能显著增加食欲,但体重没有明显增加。米氮平对食欲、睡眠、焦虑和抑郁的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信