Neural Correlates of Mind-wandering during Encoding Tasks: A Meta-analysis of 64 Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Hongkeun Kim
{"title":"Neural Correlates of Mind-wandering during Encoding Tasks: A Meta-analysis of 64 Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies.","authors":"Hongkeun Kim","doi":"10.1162/jocn_a_02343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our minds frequently drift from the task at hand to other mental content, a process commonly referred to as mind-wandering. Task focus typically leads to high-quality encoding of task events, whereas mind-wandering tends to result in low-quality encoding. This study conducted a meta-analysis of fMRI studies comparing high-quality and low-quality encoding to explore the neural correlates of mind-wandering. Key findings show that activation during mind-wandering is closely associated with four specific subnetworks: Default Mode Network-A, Frontoparietal Network-B and -C, and Ventral Attention Network-B. In contrast, deactivation primarily occurs within Dorsal Attention Network-A, Frontoparietal Network-A, and Default Mode Network-B and -C. These findings offer empirical support for several prominent theoretical accounts of mind-wandering, including those emphasizing internal cognition, perceptual decoupling, executive control (both failure and engagement), and reduced filtering. These results highlight the importance of a fine-grained, network-based approach to understanding the complex neural dynamics of mind-wandering.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our minds frequently drift from the task at hand to other mental content, a process commonly referred to as mind-wandering. Task focus typically leads to high-quality encoding of task events, whereas mind-wandering tends to result in low-quality encoding. This study conducted a meta-analysis of fMRI studies comparing high-quality and low-quality encoding to explore the neural correlates of mind-wandering. Key findings show that activation during mind-wandering is closely associated with four specific subnetworks: Default Mode Network-A, Frontoparietal Network-B and -C, and Ventral Attention Network-B. In contrast, deactivation primarily occurs within Dorsal Attention Network-A, Frontoparietal Network-A, and Default Mode Network-B and -C. These findings offer empirical support for several prominent theoretical accounts of mind-wandering, including those emphasizing internal cognition, perceptual decoupling, executive control (both failure and engagement), and reduced filtering. These results highlight the importance of a fine-grained, network-based approach to understanding the complex neural dynamics of mind-wandering.

编码任务中走神的神经关联:64项功能性磁共振成像研究的荟萃分析。
我们的思想经常从手头的任务转移到其他思想内容,这一过程通常被称为走神。任务集中通常会导致高质量的任务事件编码,而走神则会导致低质量的编码。本研究对fMRI研究进行了荟萃分析,比较了高质量和低质量编码,以探索走神的神经关联。主要发现表明,走神时的激活与四个特定的子网络密切相关:默认模式网络- a、额顶叶网络- b和-C以及腹侧注意网络- b。相反,失活主要发生在背侧注意网络- a、额顶叶网络- a、默认模式网络b和-C。这些发现为一些著名的走神理论提供了实证支持,包括那些强调内部认知、感知解耦、执行控制(包括失败和参与)和减少过滤的理论。这些结果强调了细粒度的、基于网络的方法对于理解走神的复杂神经动力学的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信