Role of ultrasound-guided brachiocephalic venous cannulation for difficult venous cannulation in pediatric patients: A narrative review.

IF 1.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Poonam Kumari, Amarjeet Kumar, Chandni Sinha, Ajeet Kumar, Kunal Singh
{"title":"Role of ultrasound-guided brachiocephalic venous cannulation for difficult venous cannulation in pediatric patients: A narrative review.","authors":"Poonam Kumari, Amarjeet Kumar, Chandni Sinha, Ajeet Kumar, Kunal Singh","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_67_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Difficult venous access is characterized by non-visible and non-palpable veins; a highly experienced operator is required with the use of technological aids to insert a vascular device. Patients with difficult venous cannulation undergo multiple, painful attempts to gain peripheral venous access. Compared to adults, inserting a central venous cannulation (CVC) is thought to be a more difficult procedure in children, particularly in neonates and young infants. IJV catheterization is perceived as the gold-standard route for CVC but remains difficult for newborn, premature, and critically ill children. Therefore, in recent years, novel ultrasound-guided brachiocephalic venous (BCV) cannulation in neonates has gained popularity. The aim of this narrative review was to assess the success rate. The primary objective of this review was to determine the first-attempt success rate. The secondary objectives were the total number of attempts, cannulation time, overall success rate, and complications. All articles relevant to BCV cannulation were searched in six major databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Ovid, PMC, and Google Scholar). A total of 16 records were included in this narrative review. According to Breschan <i>et al.</i>, Merchaoui <i>et al.</i>, and Vafek <i>et al.</i>, the success rate of BCV cannulation in children was 89.1%, 98.4%, and 50%, respectively. Kumar <i>et al.</i>, Erroz <i>et al.</i>, and Breschan <i>et al</i>. found that the first-attempt success rate was higher in the in-plane left BCV (74%, 73% and 82.9% respectively). Falay <i>et al</i>. and Erroz <i>et al</i>. found a lower complication and infection with BCV cannulation. There is evidence that during CVC placement, US-guided BCV cannulation has a higher first-attempt success rate, requires less cannulation time, and has a lower complication rate in comparison to other approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"41 2","pages":"213-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_67_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Difficult venous access is characterized by non-visible and non-palpable veins; a highly experienced operator is required with the use of technological aids to insert a vascular device. Patients with difficult venous cannulation undergo multiple, painful attempts to gain peripheral venous access. Compared to adults, inserting a central venous cannulation (CVC) is thought to be a more difficult procedure in children, particularly in neonates and young infants. IJV catheterization is perceived as the gold-standard route for CVC but remains difficult for newborn, premature, and critically ill children. Therefore, in recent years, novel ultrasound-guided brachiocephalic venous (BCV) cannulation in neonates has gained popularity. The aim of this narrative review was to assess the success rate. The primary objective of this review was to determine the first-attempt success rate. The secondary objectives were the total number of attempts, cannulation time, overall success rate, and complications. All articles relevant to BCV cannulation were searched in six major databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Ovid, PMC, and Google Scholar). A total of 16 records were included in this narrative review. According to Breschan et al., Merchaoui et al., and Vafek et al., the success rate of BCV cannulation in children was 89.1%, 98.4%, and 50%, respectively. Kumar et al., Erroz et al., and Breschan et al. found that the first-attempt success rate was higher in the in-plane left BCV (74%, 73% and 82.9% respectively). Falay et al. and Erroz et al. found a lower complication and infection with BCV cannulation. There is evidence that during CVC placement, US-guided BCV cannulation has a higher first-attempt success rate, requires less cannulation time, and has a lower complication rate in comparison to other approaches.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超声引导下头臂静脉置管在小儿静脉置管困难中的作用:综述。
静脉通路困难的特点是看不到和摸不到静脉;需要经验丰富的操作人员使用技术辅助工具插入血管装置。静脉插管困难的患者经历多次痛苦的尝试以获得外周静脉通路。与成人相比,中心静脉插管(CVC)被认为是儿童,特别是新生儿和幼儿更为困难的手术。IJV置管被认为是CVC的金标准途径,但对于新生儿、早产儿和危重儿童来说仍然很困难。因此,近年来,新型超声引导新生儿头臂静脉插管(BCV)得到了广泛的应用。这篇叙述性综述的目的是评估成功率。本综述的主要目的是确定首次尝试的成功率。次要目标是总尝试次数、插管时间、总成功率和并发症。在六个主要数据库(PubMed, Embase, Medline, Ovid, PMC和谷歌Scholar)中检索所有与BCV插管相关的文章。这篇叙事性评论共收录了16条记录。根据Breschan等、Merchaoui等、Vafek等的研究,儿童BCV插管成功率分别为89.1%、98.4%和50%。Kumar等、Erroz等、Breschan等发现,平面内左侧BCV的首次尝试成功率更高(分别为74%、73%和82.9%)。Falay等和Erroz等发现BCV插管的并发症和感染较低。有证据表明,在CVC放置过程中,us引导BCV插管与其他方法相比,首次成功率更高,插管时间更短,并发症发生率更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信