Comparing postoperative pain control after modified radical mastectomy: a pilot study of ultra-sound guided erector spinae plane block vs intraoperative tramadol administration in oncology patients.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ana Cvetković, Marković Ivan, Žegarac Milan, Marko Jevrić, Zoran Bukumiric, Mirčić Dijana, Andrej Jokić, Badnjarević Damjana, Marko Buta
{"title":"Comparing postoperative pain control after modified radical mastectomy: a pilot study of ultra-sound guided erector spinae plane block vs intraoperative tramadol administration in oncology patients.","authors":"Ana Cvetković, Marković Ivan, Žegarac Milan, Marko Jevrić, Zoran Bukumiric, Mirčić Dijana, Andrej Jokić, Badnjarević Damjana, Marko Buta","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06197-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with intraoperative Tramadol for postoperative pain management after modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The primary focus was on pain intensity within the first 24 h, while secondary outcomes included the need for rescue analgesia, nausea, vomiting, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 49 female patients (ASA I-II, aged 30-80) who underwent MRM from 2021 to 2023 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: one receiving ESPB preoperatively (25 patients) and the other receiving Tramadol during surgery (24 patients). Pain levels were measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and data on rescue analgesia, vital signs, nausea, vomiting, and patient satisfaction were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ESPB group reported significantly lower pain levels during the first six postoperative hours (NRS scores of 0 vs. 3; p = 0.005), along with a reduced need for rescue analgesia (88% vs. 54.2%; p = 0.010). Moreover, patient satisfaction was higher in the ESPB group (64% vs. 37.5%; p = 0.03). The intraoperative heart rate was also lower in the ESPB group (65.3 vs. 72.0 bpm; p = 0.030). No significant differences were found in nausea, vomiting, or length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, ESPB demonstrates superior early postoperative pain control and improved patient satisfaction compared to Tramadol. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 4","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06197-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with intraoperative Tramadol for postoperative pain management after modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The primary focus was on pain intensity within the first 24 h, while secondary outcomes included the need for rescue analgesia, nausea, vomiting, and patient satisfaction.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 49 female patients (ASA I-II, aged 30-80) who underwent MRM from 2021 to 2023 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: one receiving ESPB preoperatively (25 patients) and the other receiving Tramadol during surgery (24 patients). Pain levels were measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and data on rescue analgesia, vital signs, nausea, vomiting, and patient satisfaction were collected.

Results: The ESPB group reported significantly lower pain levels during the first six postoperative hours (NRS scores of 0 vs. 3; p = 0.005), along with a reduced need for rescue analgesia (88% vs. 54.2%; p = 0.010). Moreover, patient satisfaction was higher in the ESPB group (64% vs. 37.5%; p = 0.03). The intraoperative heart rate was also lower in the ESPB group (65.3 vs. 72.0 bpm; p = 0.030). No significant differences were found in nausea, vomiting, or length of hospital stay.

Conclusion: Overall, ESPB demonstrates superior early postoperative pain control and improved patient satisfaction compared to Tramadol. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

改良乳房根治术后疼痛控制的比较:超声引导直立者脊柱平面阻滞与肿瘤患者术中曲马多给药的初步研究。
目的:本研究旨在比较超声引导下直立脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)与术中曲马多在改良乳房根治术(MRM)术后疼痛管理中的效果。主要关注的是前24小时内的疼痛强度,次要结果包括是否需要抢救止痛、恶心、呕吐和患者满意度。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,分析了49例女性患者(ASA I-II,年龄30-80岁)在2021年至2023年间接受了MRM。患者分为两组:一组术前接受ESPB治疗(25例),另一组术中接受曲马多治疗(24例)。使用数字评定量表(NRS)测量疼痛水平,并收集救援镇痛、生命体征、恶心、呕吐和患者满意度的数据。结果:ESPB组术后前6小时疼痛水平明显降低(NRS评分0比3;P = 0.005),同时减少了对抢救性镇痛的需求(88%对54.2%;p = 0.010)。此外,ESPB组患者满意度更高(64% vs. 37.5%;p = 0.03)。ESPB组术中心率也较低(65.3比72.0 bpm;p = 0.030)。在恶心、呕吐或住院时间方面没有发现显著差异。结论:总体而言,与曲马多相比,ESPB具有更好的术后早期疼痛控制和患者满意度。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信