Parents' employment and non-chromosomal congenital anomalies in South Korea: a national population cohort study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kyuwon Kim, Hoyol Jhang, Erdenetuya Bolormaa, Chae Bong Kim, Seung-Ah Choe
{"title":"Parents' employment and non-chromosomal congenital anomalies in South Korea: a national population cohort study.","authors":"Kyuwon Kim, Hoyol Jhang, Erdenetuya Bolormaa, Chae Bong Kim, Seung-Ah Choe","doi":"10.4178/epih.e2025018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We assessed the association between parents' employment status, including industrial classification, and non-chromosomal congenital anomalies in offspring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from mothers who delivered live births between 2020 and 2022, linking their records with those of their neonates from the National Health Information Service (NHIS) database. Our analysis focused on common industrial classifications representing at least 6% of the total workforce. Congenital anomalies were identified based on neonates' diagnostic codes. We conducted logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of congenital anomalies by the industrial classification of mothers and their partners, adjusting for individual risk factors, with the financial industry serving as the reference category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 338,637 women with a live birth, 148,818 (43.9%) were employed at the time of pregnancy. Employment was associated with a higher risk of congenital anomalies (OR, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.12). Within the common industrial classifications, health and social work exhibited the highest risk (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.06-1.22) compared to the financial industry. Women employed in general hospitals showed particularly elevated risks (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.04-1.37). Among male partners, the risk estimates were generally imprecise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates that certain industries are linked with a higher risk of congenital anomalies among women workers. These findings underscore the need for enhanced safety measures in high-risk industrial settings to reduce the occurrence of congenital anomalies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48543,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Health","volume":" ","pages":"e2025018"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2025018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We assessed the association between parents' employment status, including industrial classification, and non-chromosomal congenital anomalies in offspring.

Methods: We analyzed data from mothers who delivered live births between 2020 and 2022, linking their records with those of their neonates from the National Health Information Service (NHIS) database. Our analysis focused on common industrial classifications representing at least 6% of the total workforce. Congenital anomalies were identified based on neonates' diagnostic codes. We conducted logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of congenital anomalies by the industrial classification of mothers and their partners, adjusting for individual risk factors, with the financial industry serving as the reference category.

Results: Among 338,637 women with a live birth, 148,818 (43.9%) were employed at the time of pregnancy. Employment was associated with a higher risk of congenital anomalies (OR, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.12). Within the common industrial classifications, health and social work exhibited the highest risk (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.06-1.22) compared to the financial industry. Women employed in general hospitals showed particularly elevated risks (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.04-1.37). Among male partners, the risk estimates were generally imprecise.

Conclusion: The study indicates that certain industries are linked with a higher risk of congenital anomalies among women workers. These findings underscore the need for enhanced safety measures in high-risk industrial settings to reduce the occurrence of congenital anomalies.

韩国父母就业与非染色体先天性异常:一项全国人口队列研究。
目的:我们评估父母的就业状况(包括行业分类)与后代非染色体先天性异常之间的关系。方法:我们分析了2020年至2022年间活产的母亲的数据,并将她们的记录与国家卫生信息服务(NHIS)数据库中新生儿的记录联系起来。我们的分析集中在至少占总劳动力6%的常见行业分类上。根据新生儿诊断代码识别先天性异常。我们以金融行业作为参考类别,通过母亲及其伴侣的行业分类,调整个体风险因素,进行逻辑回归估计先天性异常的优势比(ORs)。结果:在338,637名活产妇女中,148,818名(43.9%)在怀孕期间就业。就业与先天性异常的高风险相关(OR, 1.08;95%可信区间[CI], 1.04-1.12)。在常见的行业分类中,卫生和社会工作的风险最高(OR, 1.11;95% CI, 1.06-1.22)与金融业相比。在综合医院工作的妇女风险特别高(OR, 1.19;95% ci, 1.04-1.37)。在男性伴侣中,风险估计通常是不精确的。结论:该研究表明,某些行业与女性工人先天性异常的风险较高有关。这些发现强调了在高风险工业环境中加强安全措施以减少先天性异常发生的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiology and Health
Epidemiology and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology and Health (epiH) is an electronic journal publishing papers in all areas of epidemiology and public health. It is indexed on PubMed Central and the scope is wide-ranging: including descriptive, analytical and molecular epidemiology; primary preventive measures; screening approaches and secondary prevention; clinical epidemiology; and all aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases prevention. The epiH publishes original research, and also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, cohort profiles and data profiles, epidemic and case investigations, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信