Does LGBTQ+ Community Connectedness Buffer Discrimination's Indirect Effect on Generalized Anxiety Through Rejection Sensitivity in LGBTQ+ U.S. Adults?

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xaaran A Dolence, Bethany A Hermann, Isabel I Mullins, Pavel S Blagov
{"title":"Does LGBTQ+ Community Connectedness Buffer Discrimination's Indirect Effect on Generalized Anxiety Through Rejection Sensitivity in LGBTQ+ U.S. Adults?","authors":"Xaaran A Dolence, Bethany A Hermann, Isabel I Mullins, Pavel S Blagov","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2493145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, and other (LGBTQ+) persons with marginalized sexual-orientation identities are at risk of worse mental health relative to their heterosexual peers as a result of greater distal stressors faced by this community. The elevated prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder is one example of this health disparity. Informed by the theories of minority stress, rejection sensitivity, and stress buffering, we tested LGBTQ+-related rejection sensitivity as a potential mechanism and LGBTQ+ community connectedness as a potential protective factor in the effect of anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination on generalized anxiety in LGBTQ+ people. Using survey data from adult U.S. participants with diverse sexual-orientation identities, gender identities, and geographic locations (<i>N</i> = 461), we found that LGBTQ+-related rejection sensitivity mediates the indirect effect of experiences with anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination on generalized anxiety. We found that this indirect effect occurred contextually, primarily in persons who had low to moderate, but not high, LGBTQ+ community connectedness. In exploratory analyses, the results remained substantially unchanged when controlling for age, sexual orientation identity, gender identity, and region. We conclude that LGBTQ+-related rejection sensitivity may partially explain, whereas LGBTQ+ community connectedness may buffer the effect of minority stress on generalized anxiety in LGBTQ+ people.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2493145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, and other (LGBTQ+) persons with marginalized sexual-orientation identities are at risk of worse mental health relative to their heterosexual peers as a result of greater distal stressors faced by this community. The elevated prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder is one example of this health disparity. Informed by the theories of minority stress, rejection sensitivity, and stress buffering, we tested LGBTQ+-related rejection sensitivity as a potential mechanism and LGBTQ+ community connectedness as a potential protective factor in the effect of anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination on generalized anxiety in LGBTQ+ people. Using survey data from adult U.S. participants with diverse sexual-orientation identities, gender identities, and geographic locations (N = 461), we found that LGBTQ+-related rejection sensitivity mediates the indirect effect of experiences with anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination on generalized anxiety. We found that this indirect effect occurred contextually, primarily in persons who had low to moderate, but not high, LGBTQ+ community connectedness. In exploratory analyses, the results remained substantially unchanged when controlling for age, sexual orientation identity, gender identity, and region. We conclude that LGBTQ+-related rejection sensitivity may partially explain, whereas LGBTQ+ community connectedness may buffer the effect of minority stress on generalized anxiety in LGBTQ+ people.

LGBTQ+社区连通性是否通过排斥敏感性缓冲歧视对美国LGBTQ+成年人广泛性焦虑的间接影响?
女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿和其他(LGBTQ+)性取向被边缘化的人群相对于异性恋同龄人的心理健康状况更差,因为他们面临着更大的远端压力源。广泛性焦虑症的高患病率就是这种健康差异的一个例子。基于少数群体应激、排斥敏感性和应激缓冲理论,我们验证了LGBTQ+相关排斥敏感性作为反歧视对LGBTQ+人群广泛性焦虑影响的潜在机制,LGBTQ+社区连通性作为潜在保护因素。通过对美国不同性取向认同、性别认同和地理位置的成年参与者(N = 461)的调查数据,我们发现LGBTQ+相关的排斥敏感性介导了反LGBTQ+歧视经历对广泛性焦虑的间接影响。我们发现,这种间接影响主要发生在LGBTQ+社区联系程度低至中等但不高的人群中。在探索性分析中,在控制年龄、性取向认同、性别认同和地区的情况下,结果基本保持不变。我们得出结论,LGBTQ+相关的拒绝敏感性可能是部分原因,而LGBTQ+社区连通性可能会缓冲少数群体压力对LGBTQ+人群广泛性焦虑的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信