Efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Single-Port Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Observer-Blinded Controlled Trial.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jihyun Chung, Seunguk Bang, Sangmook Lee, Youngin Lee, Hyun-Jung Shin, Yoonji Park
{"title":"Efficacy of Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Single-Port Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Observer-Blinded Controlled Trial.","authors":"Jihyun Chung, Seunguk Bang, Sangmook Lee, Youngin Lee, Hyun-Jung Shin, Yoonji Park","doi":"10.3390/medicina61040702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a regional anesthesia technique widely utilized in multimodal analgesia strategies for abdominal surgeries. While a few studies have investigated its efficacy in multiport total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), its effectiveness in single-port TLH remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether QLB reduces opioid consumption and postoperative pain in patients undergoing single-port TLH. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This randomized, controlled, observer-blinded trial included 64 patients undergoing elective single-port TLH. Participants were randomly allocated to either the QLB group (n = 27) or the control group (n = 29). QLB was performed bilaterally under ultrasound guidance after surgery. The primary outcome was cumulative fentanyl consumption within 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at predefined intervals, time to first opioid demand, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and other complications. <i>Results</i>: The 24 h cumulative fentanyl consumption, which was the primary outcome, did not differ significantly between the QLB group, 342.8 [220, 651] mcg, and the control group, 470 [191.6, 648.1] mcg (<i>p</i> = 0.714). Similarly, cumulative fentanyl consumption at other time points, including 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 32 h, and 48 h, as well as in the PACU, also showed no significant differences between the two groups. Pain scores measured at these time points, along with the time to first bolus on demand, were comparable between groups. However, PONV occurred more frequently in the QLB group than in the control group (25.9% vs. 3.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.023). <i>Conclusions</i>: QLB did not significantly reduce opioid consumption, time to first opioid demand, or postoperative pain scores in single-port TLH. However, PONV occurred more frequently in the QLB group. These findings suggest that QLB may have limited analgesic benefits in single-port TLH.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12028779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a regional anesthesia technique widely utilized in multimodal analgesia strategies for abdominal surgeries. While a few studies have investigated its efficacy in multiport total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), its effectiveness in single-port TLH remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether QLB reduces opioid consumption and postoperative pain in patients undergoing single-port TLH. Materials and Methods: This randomized, controlled, observer-blinded trial included 64 patients undergoing elective single-port TLH. Participants were randomly allocated to either the QLB group (n = 27) or the control group (n = 29). QLB was performed bilaterally under ultrasound guidance after surgery. The primary outcome was cumulative fentanyl consumption within 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at predefined intervals, time to first opioid demand, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and other complications. Results: The 24 h cumulative fentanyl consumption, which was the primary outcome, did not differ significantly between the QLB group, 342.8 [220, 651] mcg, and the control group, 470 [191.6, 648.1] mcg (p = 0.714). Similarly, cumulative fentanyl consumption at other time points, including 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 32 h, and 48 h, as well as in the PACU, also showed no significant differences between the two groups. Pain scores measured at these time points, along with the time to first bolus on demand, were comparable between groups. However, PONV occurred more frequently in the QLB group than in the control group (25.9% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.023). Conclusions: QLB did not significantly reduce opioid consumption, time to first opioid demand, or postoperative pain scores in single-port TLH. However, PONV occurred more frequently in the QLB group. These findings suggest that QLB may have limited analgesic benefits in single-port TLH.

Abstract Image

腰方肌阻滞治疗单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术术后疼痛的疗效:一项随机观察-盲法对照试验。
背景与目的:腰方肌阻滞(QLB)是一种广泛应用于腹部手术多模式镇痛策略的区域麻醉技术。虽然有一些研究调查了其在多孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术(TLH)中的疗效,但其在单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术中的有效性仍不确定。本研究旨在评估QLB是否能减少单孔TLH患者的阿片类药物消耗和术后疼痛。材料和方法:这项随机、对照、观察者盲法试验包括64例选择性单孔TLH患者。参与者被随机分配到QLB组(n = 27)或对照组(n = 29)。术后在超声引导下双侧行QLB。主要终点是术后24小时内芬太尼的累积用量。次要结局包括预先设定间隔的疼痛评分、首次阿片类药物需求的时间、术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)的发生率以及其他并发症。结果:作为主要终点的24 h芬太尼累积消耗在QLB组(342.8 [220,651]mcg)和对照组(470 [191.6,648.1]mcg)之间无显著差异(p = 0.714)。同样,其他时间点,包括2 h、4 h、8 h、12 h、32 h、48 h以及PACU的累计芬太尼用量在两组之间也没有显著差异。在这些时间点测量的疼痛评分,以及根据需要第一次服用药物的时间,在两组之间具有可比性。然而,QLB组的PONV发生率高于对照组(25.9% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.023)。结论:QLB并没有显著减少阿片类药物的消耗、到第一次阿片类药物需求的时间或单孔TLH的术后疼痛评分。然而,PONV在QLB组中发生的频率更高。这些发现表明,QLB在单孔TLH中可能具有有限的镇痛作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信