Core diagnostic features of stiff person syndrome: insights from a case-control study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shuvro Roy, Yishang Huang, Chen Hu, Kathryn C Fitzgerald, Yujie Wang, Scott D Newsome
{"title":"Core diagnostic features of stiff person syndrome: insights from a case-control study.","authors":"Shuvro Roy, Yishang Huang, Chen Hu, Kathryn C Fitzgerald, Yujie Wang, Scott D Newsome","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13103-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stiff person syndrome spectrum disorders (SPSD) are rare, disabling neuroimmunological conditions with no consensus diagnostic criteria, making diagnosis challenging. Misdiagnosis often occurs due to the limited awareness of atypical symptoms and presentations. This study aimed to identify key clinical and paraclinical features most predictive of classic SPS and SPS-plus diagnosis and misdiagnosis patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case-control study at Johns Hopkins SPS center, analyzing patient data from 1997-2021. A total of 154 classic SPS, 45 SPS-plus, and 66 control patients (evaluated for SPSD but given an alternative diagnosis) were included. Clinical assessments, autoantibody testing, electromyography (EMG), and other diagnostic studies were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated, with logistic regression identifying the strongest diagnostic indicators of the SPS phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Torso/lower extremity symptoms, hypersensitivity triggers, paravertebral stiffness, and gait dysfunction were common in both phenotypes. Classic SPS was most specifically associated with high-titer GAD65 antibodies (98%), cerebrospinal fluid GAD65 positivity (100%), characteristic EMG abnormalities (> 90%), and hyperlordosis (87%). SPS-plus specificity was highest for cerebellar (98.5%) and brainstem (100%) signs/symptoms. High-titer GAD65 antibodies were the strongest independent diagnostic factor for both phenotypes. Misdiagnosis was most common in patients presenting with upper extremity, brainstem, or cerebellar involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recognizing key diagnostic and misdiagnosis patterns may help clinicians make accurate and timely diagnoses of SPSD. This could help prevent misdiagnosis/overdiagnosis, ensure timely treatment, and assure appropriate patient populations are included in future interventional SPS clinical trials. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and refine diagnostic criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 5","pages":"377"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13103-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stiff person syndrome spectrum disorders (SPSD) are rare, disabling neuroimmunological conditions with no consensus diagnostic criteria, making diagnosis challenging. Misdiagnosis often occurs due to the limited awareness of atypical symptoms and presentations. This study aimed to identify key clinical and paraclinical features most predictive of classic SPS and SPS-plus diagnosis and misdiagnosis patterns.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study at Johns Hopkins SPS center, analyzing patient data from 1997-2021. A total of 154 classic SPS, 45 SPS-plus, and 66 control patients (evaluated for SPSD but given an alternative diagnosis) were included. Clinical assessments, autoantibody testing, electromyography (EMG), and other diagnostic studies were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated, with logistic regression identifying the strongest diagnostic indicators of the SPS phenotypes.

Results: Torso/lower extremity symptoms, hypersensitivity triggers, paravertebral stiffness, and gait dysfunction were common in both phenotypes. Classic SPS was most specifically associated with high-titer GAD65 antibodies (98%), cerebrospinal fluid GAD65 positivity (100%), characteristic EMG abnormalities (> 90%), and hyperlordosis (87%). SPS-plus specificity was highest for cerebellar (98.5%) and brainstem (100%) signs/symptoms. High-titer GAD65 antibodies were the strongest independent diagnostic factor for both phenotypes. Misdiagnosis was most common in patients presenting with upper extremity, brainstem, or cerebellar involvement.

Conclusions: Recognizing key diagnostic and misdiagnosis patterns may help clinicians make accurate and timely diagnoses of SPSD. This could help prevent misdiagnosis/overdiagnosis, ensure timely treatment, and assure appropriate patient populations are included in future interventional SPS clinical trials. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and refine diagnostic criteria.

僵硬人综合征的核心诊断特征:来自病例对照研究的见解。
背景:僵硬人综合征谱系障碍(SPSD)是一种罕见的致残性神经免疫疾病,没有一致的诊断标准,使诊断具有挑战性。由于对非典型症状和表现的认识有限,经常发生误诊。本研究旨在确定最能预测经典SPS和SPS +诊断和误诊模式的关键临床和临床旁特征。方法:我们在约翰霍普金斯SPS中心进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,分析了1997-2021年的患者数据。共纳入154例典型SPS, 45例SPS +和66例对照患者(评估为SPSD但给予替代诊断)。临床评估,自身抗体检测,肌电图(EMG)和其他诊断研究进行了回顾。计算敏感性、特异性和诊断优势比,通过逻辑回归确定SPS表型的最强诊断指标。结果:躯干/下肢症状、过敏诱因、椎旁僵硬和步态功能障碍在两种表型中都很常见。经典SPS与高滴度GAD65抗体(98%)、脑脊液GAD65阳性(100%)、特征性肌电异常(> 90%)和前凸过度(87%)最特异性相关。SPS-plus对小脑(98.5%)和脑干(100%)体征/症状的特异性最高。高滴度GAD65抗体是两种表型最强的独立诊断因子。误诊最常见于上肢、脑干或小脑受累的患者。结论:认识SPSD的关键诊断和误诊模式有助于临床医生准确、及时地诊断SPSD。这有助于防止误诊/过度诊断,确保及时治疗,并确保在未来的干预性SPS临床试验中纳入适当的患者群体。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现并完善诊断标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信