Two sides of the same coin: person-centred systems versus person-centred nursing practice. Theory, barriers and opportunities.

IF 1.6 Q2 NURSING
Amy-Louise Byrne
{"title":"Two sides of the same coin: person-centred systems versus person-centred nursing practice. Theory, barriers and opportunities.","authors":"Amy-Louise Byrne","doi":"10.1177/17449871241255012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Person-centred care is a well-known concept in nursing practice. It is understood that person-centred care represents a way of providing care, which considers the person's social, emotional and physical health. Person-centred care is tailored care, which meets individual's needs, while also including them in decision-making.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Despite this, the practice of person-centred care can be stifled by system constraints which impact largely on the nursing profession. This paper aims to explore such challenges, highlighting the disconnect between theory and practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adapted from the work of Fairclough, this discourse analysis critically reviews a cross section of texts related to person-centred care and offers a critique for discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This paper has found a divergence between person-centred <i>care</i> (system) and person-centred <i>practice</i> (nursing care), highlighting the tension between the theories and practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and contribution to nursing: </strong>This paper highlights not only the challenges but also the opportunities in embedding person-centred care into system design, and considers further changes required to enable nurses to practice care which supports the whole needs of the person. It suggests that leveraging nursing expertise and experience may provide an avenue for system change.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871241255012"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871241255012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Person-centred care is a well-known concept in nursing practice. It is understood that person-centred care represents a way of providing care, which considers the person's social, emotional and physical health. Person-centred care is tailored care, which meets individual's needs, while also including them in decision-making.

Aims: Despite this, the practice of person-centred care can be stifled by system constraints which impact largely on the nursing profession. This paper aims to explore such challenges, highlighting the disconnect between theory and practice.

Methods: Adapted from the work of Fairclough, this discourse analysis critically reviews a cross section of texts related to person-centred care and offers a critique for discussion.

Results: This paper has found a divergence between person-centred care (system) and person-centred practice (nursing care), highlighting the tension between the theories and practice.

Conclusion and contribution to nursing: This paper highlights not only the challenges but also the opportunities in embedding person-centred care into system design, and considers further changes required to enable nurses to practice care which supports the whole needs of the person. It suggests that leveraging nursing expertise and experience may provide an avenue for system change.

同一枚硬币的两面:以人为本的系统与以人为本的护理实践。理论,障碍和机会。
背景:以人为本的护理是护理实践中一个众所周知的概念。据了解,以人为本的护理是一种提供护理的方式,它考虑到人的社会、情感和身体健康。以人为本的护理是量身定制的护理,既满足个人需求,又将其纳入决策。目的:尽管如此,以人为本的护理实践可能会受到系统限制,这在很大程度上影响了护理专业。本文旨在探讨这些挑战,强调理论与实践之间的脱节。方法:改编自费尔克劳的作品,本文的话语分析批判性地回顾了与以人为本的护理相关的文本的横截面,并提供了讨论的批评。结果:本文发现了以人为本的护理(系统)与以人为本的实践(护理)之间的分歧,突出了理论与实践之间的紧张关系。结论和对护理的贡献:本文不仅强调了将以人为中心的护理嵌入系统设计中的挑战,而且还强调了机遇,并考虑了使护士能够实践支持人的全部需求的护理所需的进一步变化。它表明,利用护理专业知识和经验可能为系统变革提供途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信