Association Between Maternal Creatinine to Body Weight Ratio and Small/Large for Gestational Age Newborns Among 11,734 Chinese Women.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bin Zhang, Zhaolong Zhan, Sijie Xi, Yinglu Zhang, Xiaosong Yuan
{"title":"Association Between Maternal Creatinine to Body Weight Ratio and Small/Large for Gestational Age Newborns Among 11,734 Chinese Women.","authors":"Bin Zhang, Zhaolong Zhan, Sijie Xi, Yinglu Zhang, Xiaosong Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s44197-025-00414-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum creatinine to body weight ratio (CBWR) is closely associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes, and all-cause mortality. This study aimed to assess the impact of CBWR in late pregnancy on incident small and large for gestational age (SGA/LGA) deliveries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study included 11,734 pregnant women with hospital-based hepatic/renal data (2016-2017). Demographic characteristics were compared between CBWR quintiles using appropriate parametric or nonparametric tests. Relationship between CBWR and clinical/laboratory parameters was assessed using Spearman's correlation. Linear regression was employed to evaluate the association of CBWR with fetal birth length/weight, while logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for SGA/LGA, with both models adjusting for maternal age, parity, blood pressure, gestational week, assisted reproduction, neonatal sex, and laboratory results. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup stratifications confirmed these associations. Non-linear trends were explored using smooth curve fitting techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among these newborns, 1033 (8.80%) were classified as SGA and 1,827 (15.57%) as LGA. CBWR was associated with smaller birth length (β = -0.21 cm; 95% CI: -0.28, -0.15) and lower birth weight (β = -0.29 kg; 95% CI: -0.31, -0.27) in the highest versus lowest quintile. The multivariate-adjusted ORs of SGA in higher quintiles versus the lowest quintile of CBWR were 1.63 (95% CI: 1.21, 2.21), 2.16 (95% CI: 1.61, 2.89), 2.99 (95% CI: 2.25, 3.97), and 5.24 (95% CI: 3.97, 6.92), respectively; those for LGA were 0.60 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.70), 0.53 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.62), 0.39 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.46), and 0.23 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.29), respectively. Per standard deviation (SD) increase in CBWR was accompanied by a 1.63-fold increase in SGA risk (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.52, 1.75) and a 42% decrease in LGA risk (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.55, 0.63). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the consistence of these findings. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that CBWR was strongly associated with SGA risk in women with CBWR > 0.98 umol/L/kg complicated by preeclampsia or preterm birth, while in those complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus, the association was attenuated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that elevated CBWR in late pregnancy may be associated with decreased LGA risk and increased SGA risk. While CBWR represents an easily measurable and cost-effective potential indicator, these observational results require validation in prospective, population-based studies before considering clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":15796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-025-00414-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Serum creatinine to body weight ratio (CBWR) is closely associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes, and all-cause mortality. This study aimed to assess the impact of CBWR in late pregnancy on incident small and large for gestational age (SGA/LGA) deliveries.

Methods: This observational study included 11,734 pregnant women with hospital-based hepatic/renal data (2016-2017). Demographic characteristics were compared between CBWR quintiles using appropriate parametric or nonparametric tests. Relationship between CBWR and clinical/laboratory parameters was assessed using Spearman's correlation. Linear regression was employed to evaluate the association of CBWR with fetal birth length/weight, while logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for SGA/LGA, with both models adjusting for maternal age, parity, blood pressure, gestational week, assisted reproduction, neonatal sex, and laboratory results. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup stratifications confirmed these associations. Non-linear trends were explored using smooth curve fitting techniques.

Results: Among these newborns, 1033 (8.80%) were classified as SGA and 1,827 (15.57%) as LGA. CBWR was associated with smaller birth length (β = -0.21 cm; 95% CI: -0.28, -0.15) and lower birth weight (β = -0.29 kg; 95% CI: -0.31, -0.27) in the highest versus lowest quintile. The multivariate-adjusted ORs of SGA in higher quintiles versus the lowest quintile of CBWR were 1.63 (95% CI: 1.21, 2.21), 2.16 (95% CI: 1.61, 2.89), 2.99 (95% CI: 2.25, 3.97), and 5.24 (95% CI: 3.97, 6.92), respectively; those for LGA were 0.60 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.70), 0.53 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.62), 0.39 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.46), and 0.23 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.29), respectively. Per standard deviation (SD) increase in CBWR was accompanied by a 1.63-fold increase in SGA risk (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.52, 1.75) and a 42% decrease in LGA risk (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.55, 0.63). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the consistence of these findings. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that CBWR was strongly associated with SGA risk in women with CBWR > 0.98 umol/L/kg complicated by preeclampsia or preterm birth, while in those complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus, the association was attenuated.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that elevated CBWR in late pregnancy may be associated with decreased LGA risk and increased SGA risk. While CBWR represents an easily measurable and cost-effective potential indicator, these observational results require validation in prospective, population-based studies before considering clinical application.

11734名中国妇女孕龄新生儿肌酐/体重比与小/大的关系
背景:血清肌酐与体重比(CBWR)与非酒精性脂肪肝、糖尿病和全因死亡率密切相关。本研究旨在评估妊娠后期CBWR对小胎龄和大胎龄分娩(SGA/LGA)的影响。方法:本观察性研究纳入了11,734名有医院肝/肾数据的孕妇(2016-2017年)。采用适当的参数或非参数检验比较CBWR五分位数之间的人口统计学特征。采用Spearman相关法评估CBWR与临床/实验室参数的关系。采用线性回归来评估CBWR与胎儿出生长度/体重的关系,而采用logistic回归来计算SGA/LGA的校正优势比(ORs),两个模型都调整了母亲年龄、胎次、血压、妊娠周、辅助生殖、新生儿性别和实验室结果。敏感性分析和亚组分层证实了这些关联。利用光滑曲线拟合技术探索非线性趋势。结果:SGA患儿1033例(8.80%),LGA患儿1827例(15.57%)。CBWR与较小的出生长度相关(β = -0.21 cm;95% CI: -0.28, -0.15)和较低的出生体重(β = -0.29 kg;95% CI: -0.31, -0.27)。CBWR高五分位数的SGA与最低五分位数的多变量调整后的or分别为1.63 (95% CI: 1.21, 2.21)、2.16 (95% CI: 1.61, 2.89)、2.99 (95% CI: 2.25, 3.97)和5.24 (95% CI: 3.97, 6.92);LGA组分别为0.60 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.70)、0.53 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.62)、0.39 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.46)和0.23 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.29)。每标准差(SD) CBWR增加时,SGA风险增加1.63倍(OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.52, 1.75), LGA风险降低42% (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.55, 0.63)。敏感性分析证实了这些发现的一致性。亚组分析显示,合并子痫前期或早产的孕妇CBWR与SGA风险密切相关,而合并妊娠期糖尿病的孕妇CBWR与SGA风险的相关性减弱。结论:我们的研究结果表明,妊娠后期CBWR升高可能与LGA风险降低和SGA风险增加有关。虽然CBWR是一种容易测量且具有成本效益的潜在指标,但在考虑临床应用之前,这些观察结果需要在前瞻性、基于人群的研究中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
57
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health is an esteemed international publication, offering a platform for peer-reviewed articles that drive advancements in global epidemiology and international health. Our mission is to shape global health policy by showcasing cutting-edge scholarship and innovative strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信