[MEP-37] Thoracofemoral Bypass and Long-Term Success in Juxtarenal Aortic Occlusion.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Ayhan Güneş, Sabit Sarıkaya
{"title":"[MEP-37] Thoracofemoral Bypass and Long-Term Success in Juxtarenal Aortic Occlusion.","authors":"Ayhan Güneş, Sabit Sarıkaya","doi":"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.mep-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to share 16 years of experience and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent thoracofemoral bypass as the initial treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two patients (28 males, 4 females; mean age: 62; range, 56 to 67.5 years) who underwent thoracofemoral bypass for severe aortoiliac occlusive disease between 2005 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The occlusion and calcified plaques of the abdominal aorta at the renal level were common characteristics of all patients. The patients were divided into two groups: the severe claudication group (Rutherford III) and the chronic limb-threatening ischemia group (Rutherford IV and V).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up duration was 79±32 months. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.2% (n=1). Major complications were observed in 9.6% (n=3) of patients (respiratory in 6.4%, retroperitoneal hematoma in 3.2%). Minor complications occurred in 41.9% of patients, including pleural effusion in 9.6% (n=3), acute kidney injury in 9.6% (n=3), gastrointestinal bleeding in 3.2% (n=1), paralytic ileus in 6.4% (n=2), and superficial skin infection in 12.9% (n=4). The rate of postoperative superficial skin infection was higher in the chronic limb-threatening ischemia group compared to the claudication group (n=4 [40%] vs. n=0, p=0.007). The five-year Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated that the primary patency for the entire study was 96±7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.6- 100), and the secondary patency was 96.3±6% (95% CI 89.4-100). The five-year Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated that survival rate after thoracofemoral bypass was 93.4±3% (95% CI 91-100).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that thoracofemoral bypass, although complex, is a safe and effective initial treatment for juxtarenal total aortic occlusion, with low mortality and morbidity rates and excellent long-term outcomes in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49413,"journal":{"name":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"32 4 Suppl 2","pages":"135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.mep-37","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to share 16 years of experience and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent thoracofemoral bypass as the initial treatment.

Methods: Thirty-two patients (28 males, 4 females; mean age: 62; range, 56 to 67.5 years) who underwent thoracofemoral bypass for severe aortoiliac occlusive disease between 2005 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The occlusion and calcified plaques of the abdominal aorta at the renal level were common characteristics of all patients. The patients were divided into two groups: the severe claudication group (Rutherford III) and the chronic limb-threatening ischemia group (Rutherford IV and V).

Results: The mean follow-up duration was 79±32 months. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.2% (n=1). Major complications were observed in 9.6% (n=3) of patients (respiratory in 6.4%, retroperitoneal hematoma in 3.2%). Minor complications occurred in 41.9% of patients, including pleural effusion in 9.6% (n=3), acute kidney injury in 9.6% (n=3), gastrointestinal bleeding in 3.2% (n=1), paralytic ileus in 6.4% (n=2), and superficial skin infection in 12.9% (n=4). The rate of postoperative superficial skin infection was higher in the chronic limb-threatening ischemia group compared to the claudication group (n=4 [40%] vs. n=0, p=0.007). The five-year Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated that the primary patency for the entire study was 96±7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.6- 100), and the secondary patency was 96.3±6% (95% CI 89.4-100). The five-year Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated that survival rate after thoracofemoral bypass was 93.4±3% (95% CI 91-100).

Conclusion: This study shows that thoracofemoral bypass, although complex, is a safe and effective initial treatment for juxtarenal total aortic occlusion, with low mortality and morbidity rates and excellent long-term outcomes in selected patients.

[MEP-37]胸股动脉搭桥术治疗肾旁主动脉阻塞的长期成功。
目的:本研究旨在分享16年来接受胸股搭桥作为初始治疗的患者的经验和长期结果。方法:32例患者(男28例,女4例;平均年龄62岁;回顾性分析了2005年至2022年间56至67.5岁因严重主动脉髂闭塞性疾病接受胸股旁路治疗的患者。肾水平腹主动脉闭塞和钙化斑块是所有患者的共同特征。将患者分为两组:重度跛行组(Rutherford III)和慢性肢体威胁缺血组(Rutherford IV和V)。结果:平均随访79±32个月。30天死亡率为3.2% (n=1)。9.6% (n=3)的患者出现严重并发症(呼吸系统6.4%,腹膜后血肿3.2%)。41.9%的患者出现轻微并发症,其中胸腔积液9.6% (n=3),急性肾损伤9.6% (n=3),胃肠道出血3.2% (n=1),麻痹性肠梗阻6.4% (n=2),浅表皮肤感染12.9% (n=4)。慢性肢体缺血组术后浅表皮肤感染发生率高于跛行组(n=4[40%]比n=0, p=0.007)。五年Kaplan-Meier分析估计整个研究的原发性通畅率为96±7%(95%可信区间[CI] 88.6- 100),继发性通畅率为96.3±6% (95% CI 89.4-100)。5年Kaplan-Meier分析估计胸股绕道术后生存率为93.4±3% (95% CI 91-100)。结论:本研究表明,胸股动脉旁路手术虽然复杂,但是一种安全有效的治疗膝旁全主动脉闭塞的初始治疗方法,在选定的患者中死亡率和发病率低,长期预后良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is an international open access journal which publishes original articles on topics in generality of Cardiac, Thoracic, Arterial, Venous, Lymphatic Disorders and their managements. These encompass all relevant clinical, surgical and experimental studies, editorials, current and collective reviews, technical know-how papers, case reports, interesting images, How to Do It papers, correspondences, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信