In Vivo Kinematics for Various Robotically Performed Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant Designs.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Michael Tim-Yun Ong, Michael T LaCour, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung, Garett M Dessinger, Richard D Komistek
{"title":"In Vivo Kinematics for Various Robotically Performed Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant Designs.","authors":"Michael Tim-Yun Ong, Michael T LaCour, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung, Garett M Dessinger, Richard D Komistek","doi":"10.1002/jor.26091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although it is well-documented that robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can improve surgical precision, evaluations of the postoperative kinematics of patients implanted using robotics remain less common. The objective of this study is to analyze the weight-bearing kinematics for multiple TKAs implanted using two different surgical robots. In vivo knee kinematics were assessed using fluoroscopy for 28 subjects implanted with a Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS) TKA, 23 with a Bi-Cruciate Retaining (BCR) TKA, 13 with a posterior stabilized (PS) TKA, and 22 with a cruciate retaining (CR) TKA. All subjects were implanted by the same surgeon using the respective company's surgical robot. All subjects performed a weight-bearing deep knee bend. Parameters of interest include the femoral condylar anterior/posterior motion, femorotibial axial rotation, and weight-bearing range-of-motion. The BCS TKA experienced the most posterior rollback, 13.4 ± 4.4 mm for the lateral condyle and 5.8 ± 2.5 mm for the medial condyle. These subjects also experienced the most femorotibial axial rotation, +9.3 ± 5.3°. Conversely, CR subjects experienced the least overall rollback and most anterior sliding, 0.4 ± 3.8 mm of lateral rollback and 1.9 ± 4.1 mm of medial anterior sliding. Implant design appears to play a significant role in postoperative kinematics. Improved stability is evident in TKAs that account for the ACL. However, no system behaved significantly better nor worse than previously published literature evaluating standard instrumentation. Level of Evidence: Level 3, retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although it is well-documented that robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can improve surgical precision, evaluations of the postoperative kinematics of patients implanted using robotics remain less common. The objective of this study is to analyze the weight-bearing kinematics for multiple TKAs implanted using two different surgical robots. In vivo knee kinematics were assessed using fluoroscopy for 28 subjects implanted with a Bi-Cruciate Stabilized (BCS) TKA, 23 with a Bi-Cruciate Retaining (BCR) TKA, 13 with a posterior stabilized (PS) TKA, and 22 with a cruciate retaining (CR) TKA. All subjects were implanted by the same surgeon using the respective company's surgical robot. All subjects performed a weight-bearing deep knee bend. Parameters of interest include the femoral condylar anterior/posterior motion, femorotibial axial rotation, and weight-bearing range-of-motion. The BCS TKA experienced the most posterior rollback, 13.4 ± 4.4 mm for the lateral condyle and 5.8 ± 2.5 mm for the medial condyle. These subjects also experienced the most femorotibial axial rotation, +9.3 ± 5.3°. Conversely, CR subjects experienced the least overall rollback and most anterior sliding, 0.4 ± 3.8 mm of lateral rollback and 1.9 ± 4.1 mm of medial anterior sliding. Implant design appears to play a significant role in postoperative kinematics. Improved stability is evident in TKAs that account for the ACL. However, no system behaved significantly better nor worse than previously published literature evaluating standard instrumentation. Level of Evidence: Level 3, retrospective cohort study.

各种机器人全膝关节置换术植入物设计的体内运动学。
尽管机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(TKA)可以提高手术精度,但对使用机器人植入的患者的术后运动学评估仍然不太常见。本研究的目的是分析使用两种不同的手术机器人植入多个tka的负重运动学。对28例植入双十字稳定(BCS) TKA、23例植入双十字保留(BCR) TKA、13例植入后稳定(PS) TKA和22例植入十字保留(CR) TKA的患者进行了体内膝关节运动学评估。所有受试者都由同一名外科医生使用各自公司的手术机器人进行植入。所有受试者都进行了负重深屈膝。感兴趣的参数包括股骨髁前后运动、股胫轴向旋转和负重运动范围。BCS TKA的后退最大,外侧髁为13.4±4.4 mm,内侧髁为5.8±2.5 mm。这些受试者还经历了最大的股胫轴向旋转,+9.3±5.3°。相反,CR受试者整体后退最少,前路滑动最多,外侧后退0.4±3.8 mm,内侧前路滑动1.9±4.1 mm。植入物的设计似乎在术后运动学中起着重要作用。在考虑ACL的tka中,稳定性的提高是显而易见的。然而,与先前发表的评估标准仪器的文献相比,没有一个系统表现得更好或更差。证据等级:3级,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信