Brant Mittler, Xavier Cambi, Morgan Biskach, Joel Reisman, Ying Wang, Dan Berlowitz, Peter Morin, Donald R Miller, Karla Brandao-Viruet, Sophie J Clare, Kevin Z Xia, Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared, Michael Irizarry, Quanwu Zhang, Weiming Xia
{"title":"Patient journey and decision processes for anti-amyloid therapy in Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Brant Mittler, Xavier Cambi, Morgan Biskach, Joel Reisman, Ying Wang, Dan Berlowitz, Peter Morin, Donald R Miller, Karla Brandao-Viruet, Sophie J Clare, Kevin Z Xia, Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared, Michael Irizarry, Quanwu Zhang, Weiming Xia","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13059-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We utilized the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System administrative database to study the clinical decision-making processes for anti-amyloid therapy (AAT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with clinical notes mentioning lecanemab were identified (March 2023-June 2024) for manual review and structured database queries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From an initial sample (N = 2499), 1064 patients (55,000 notes) were reviewed manually (mean age 76 years; 7.3% women; 9.2% Black; 3.9% Hispanic). The AAT group (n = 56) had lower rates of common comorbidities, except post-traumatic stress disorder, than patients excluded from AAT (n = 528). The documented notes including \"Lack of patient interest/resource constraints\" (24.6% vs 3.6%), \"anticoagulant use\" (23.1% vs 10.7%), and \"advanced AD\" (18.6% vs 0), supplied partial explanations on exclusion vs inclusion.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Only 5.3% of patients reached the point of care of being a candidate, scheduled for, or receiving AAT infusion. Patient preference and clinician discretion, especially regarding modifiable factors (e.g., medication regimens), appreciably influence the patient journey to AAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 5","pages":"341"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13059-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: We utilized the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System administrative database to study the clinical decision-making processes for anti-amyloid therapy (AAT).
Methods: Patients with clinical notes mentioning lecanemab were identified (March 2023-June 2024) for manual review and structured database queries.
Results: From an initial sample (N = 2499), 1064 patients (55,000 notes) were reviewed manually (mean age 76 years; 7.3% women; 9.2% Black; 3.9% Hispanic). The AAT group (n = 56) had lower rates of common comorbidities, except post-traumatic stress disorder, than patients excluded from AAT (n = 528). The documented notes including "Lack of patient interest/resource constraints" (24.6% vs 3.6%), "anticoagulant use" (23.1% vs 10.7%), and "advanced AD" (18.6% vs 0), supplied partial explanations on exclusion vs inclusion.
Discussion: Only 5.3% of patients reached the point of care of being a candidate, scheduled for, or receiving AAT infusion. Patient preference and clinician discretion, especially regarding modifiable factors (e.g., medication regimens), appreciably influence the patient journey to AAT.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.