Trauma and resilience of postdisaster bereavement in China: Integrating the perspectives of bereaved children and practitioners with macrodiscourses.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Shaojie Pan
{"title":"Trauma and resilience of postdisaster bereavement in China: Integrating the perspectives of bereaved children and practitioners with macrodiscourses.","authors":"Shaojie Pan","doi":"10.1037/tra0001928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines trauma and resilience among individuals bereaved by natural disasters in China, integrating bereaved children's and practitioners' perspectives with macrodiscourses. It explores how social contexts shape trauma and resilience, offering a novel comparison of personal, professional, and broader narratives.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 adults who experienced childhood bereavement due to the Wenchuan earthquake and nine practitioners working with traumatized children. Additionally, 58 government documents and 129 newspaper articles were analyzed to capture macrolevel discourses on trauma and resilience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Discrepancies emerged between bereaved individuals and practitioners in understanding bereavement's impact. The bereaved emphasized the long-term effects on personal development and family dynamics, highlighting the social-ecological factors shaping resilience. In contrast, practitioners focused more on the immediate psychological consequences and were less attuned to the broader socioeconomic implications. Macrodiscourses, largely framed by government and media, tended to medicalize trauma and depict resilience as overcoming adversity, simplifying its complexity compared to the more nuanced perspectives of practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trauma and resilience are shaped by the interplay of individual experiences and broader societal narratives. To improve postdisaster support, policies must consider the long-term socioeconomic impacts of bereavement and adopt a more holistic understanding of resilience, beyond psychological recovery, that is sensitive to cultural and social contexts in China. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001928","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examines trauma and resilience among individuals bereaved by natural disasters in China, integrating bereaved children's and practitioners' perspectives with macrodiscourses. It explores how social contexts shape trauma and resilience, offering a novel comparison of personal, professional, and broader narratives.

Method: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 adults who experienced childhood bereavement due to the Wenchuan earthquake and nine practitioners working with traumatized children. Additionally, 58 government documents and 129 newspaper articles were analyzed to capture macrolevel discourses on trauma and resilience.

Results: Discrepancies emerged between bereaved individuals and practitioners in understanding bereavement's impact. The bereaved emphasized the long-term effects on personal development and family dynamics, highlighting the social-ecological factors shaping resilience. In contrast, practitioners focused more on the immediate psychological consequences and were less attuned to the broader socioeconomic implications. Macrodiscourses, largely framed by government and media, tended to medicalize trauma and depict resilience as overcoming adversity, simplifying its complexity compared to the more nuanced perspectives of practitioners.

Conclusions: Trauma and resilience are shaped by the interplay of individual experiences and broader societal narratives. To improve postdisaster support, policies must consider the long-term socioeconomic impacts of bereavement and adopt a more holistic understanding of resilience, beyond psychological recovery, that is sensitive to cultural and social contexts in China. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

中国灾后丧亲的创伤和复原力:将丧亲儿童和从业者的观点与宏观话语相结合。
目的:本研究通过宏观话语的视角,探讨中国自然灾害中丧生者的创伤和复原力。它探讨了社会环境如何塑造创伤和恢复力,提供了个人,专业和更广泛的叙述的新颖比较。方法:对11名因汶川地震失去童年的成年人和9名从事创伤儿童工作的从业者进行半结构化访谈。此外,我们还分析了58份政府文件和129篇报纸文章,以捕捉有关创伤和复原力的宏观话语。结果:丧失亲人的个体和从业人员在理解丧失亲人的影响方面存在差异。丧亲者强调对个人发展和家庭动态的长期影响,强调塑造复原力的社会生态因素。相比之下,从业者更关注直接的心理后果,而不太关注更广泛的社会经济影响。宏观话语在很大程度上是由政府和媒体构建的,倾向于将创伤医学化,并将韧性描述为克服逆境,与从业者更细致的观点相比,简化了其复杂性。结论:创伤和恢复力是由个人经历和更广泛的社会叙事的相互作用形成的。为了改善灾后支持,政策必须考虑丧亲之痛的长期社会经济影响,并在心理恢复之外对复原力采取更全面的理解,这对中国的文化和社会背景很敏感。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信