Application of Catheter-Assisted Circulation System in Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0770
Zonghai He, Hongbin Gao, Cong Li, Yuhui Luo, Yang Xun, Shaogang Wang
{"title":"Application of Catheter-Assisted Circulation System in Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.","authors":"Zonghai He, Hongbin Gao, Cong Li, Yuhui Luo, Yang Xun, Shaogang Wang","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is the main method for treating ureteral calculi. The scholars used ureteroscopes with dual channels and access sheath to reduce the local temperature and flushing fluid pressure. This study compares the efficacy and safety of ureteral catheter-assisted URSL (UCA-URSL) and traditional URSL in treating ureteral calculi. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> A cross-regional retrospective case-control study in China, including 217 intention-to-treat patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University and Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, from August 2023 to July 2024. The primary outcome was the temperature of the lithotripsy point. The secondary outcomes included stone-free rate (SFR), operation time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Compared with the traditional URSL group, the catheter-assisted URSL group had a significantly lower lithotripsy point temperature (max, 37.9 ± 2.60°C <i>vs</i> 49.98 ± 5.04°C, <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean, 32.3 ± 3.25°C <i>vs</i> 38.56 ± 2.70°C, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). In addition, the UCA-URSL group showed higher absolute SFR (immediately, 89.81% <i>vs</i> 53.21%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001; 3 months, 99.07% <i>vs</i> 72.48%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and reduced operation time (22.74 ± 7.08 minutes <i>vs</i> 26.40 ± 6.72 minutes, <i>p</i> = 0.0001), postoperative fever rate (1.85% <i>vs</i> 15.60%, <i>p</i> = 0.0003), and ureteral stricture rate (0% <i>vs</i> 3.67%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In treating ureteral calculi, UCA lithotripsy shows better safety than traditional URSL. Catheter-assisted URSL can be used to improve traditional URSL.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"518-524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is the main method for treating ureteral calculi. The scholars used ureteroscopes with dual channels and access sheath to reduce the local temperature and flushing fluid pressure. This study compares the efficacy and safety of ureteral catheter-assisted URSL (UCA-URSL) and traditional URSL in treating ureteral calculi. Patients and Methods: A cross-regional retrospective case-control study in China, including 217 intention-to-treat patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University and Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, from August 2023 to July 2024. The primary outcome was the temperature of the lithotripsy point. The secondary outcomes included stone-free rate (SFR), operation time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results: Compared with the traditional URSL group, the catheter-assisted URSL group had a significantly lower lithotripsy point temperature (max, 37.9 ± 2.60°C vs 49.98 ± 5.04°C, p < 0.0001; mean, 32.3 ± 3.25°C vs 38.56 ± 2.70°C, p < 0.0001). In addition, the UCA-URSL group showed higher absolute SFR (immediately, 89.81% vs 53.21%, p < 0.0001; 3 months, 99.07% vs 72.48%, p < 0.0001), and reduced operation time (22.74 ± 7.08 minutes vs 26.40 ± 6.72 minutes, p = 0.0001), postoperative fever rate (1.85% vs 15.60%, p = 0.0003), and ureteral stricture rate (0% vs 3.67%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: In treating ureteral calculi, UCA lithotripsy shows better safety than traditional URSL. Catheter-assisted URSL can be used to improve traditional URSL.

导尿管辅助循环系统在输尿管镜钬激光碎石中的应用。
目的:输尿管镜碎石术是治疗输尿管结石的主要方法。学者们采用双通道输尿管镜和输尿管鞘,以降低局部温度和冲洗液压力。本研究比较输尿管导管辅助URSL (UCA-URSL)与传统URSL治疗输尿管结石的疗效和安全性。患者与方法:在中国进行跨区域回顾性病例对照研究,纳入2023年8月至2024年7月昆明医科大学第一附属医院和华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院有意向治疗的患者217例。主要结果是碎石点的温度。次要结局包括无结石率(SFR)、手术时间、住院时间和术后并发症。结果:与传统URSL组相比,导管辅助URSL组的碎石点温度显著降低(最高37.9±2.60°C vs 49.98±5.04°C, p < 0.0001;意思是,32.3±3.25°C vs 38.56±2.70°C, p < 0.0001)。此外,UCA-URSL组的绝对SFR更高(即刻,89.81% vs 53.21%, p < 0.0001;手术时间(22.74±7.08分钟vs 26.40±6.72分钟,p = 0.0001),术后发热率(1.85% vs 15.60%, p = 0.0003),输尿管狭窄率(0% vs 3.67%, p = 0.04)。结论:UCA碎石术治疗输尿管结石安全性优于传统URSL。导管辅助URSL是对传统URSL的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信