Inconsistent Reporting of Interactions Between Warfarin and Medicinal Plants Across Clinical Decision Support Resources.

IF 3.3 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Leonardo J Uribe-Cavero, Patricia J Vera-Maccha, Anthony Siguas-Huasasquiche, Elias E Bohorquez-Espino, Alvaro Taype-Rondan
{"title":"Inconsistent Reporting of Interactions Between Warfarin and Medicinal Plants Across Clinical Decision Support Resources.","authors":"Leonardo J Uribe-Cavero, Patricia J Vera-Maccha, Anthony Siguas-Huasasquiche, Elias E Bohorquez-Espino, Alvaro Taype-Rondan","doi":"10.1177/2515690X251334445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWarfarin, a commonly used anticoagulant, interacts with medicinal plants, potentially complicating patient management. Clinical Decision Resources (CDRs) provide guidance on these interactions, but inconsistencies across resources may impact clinical decisions. This study aims to evaluate the consistency of interaction reports between warfarin and medicinal plants across four online CDRs.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted. Medicinal plants assessed were selected from the World Health Organization's Phytotherapy Manual. Interaction reports were manually reviewed across four CDRs: UpToDate, ClinicalKey, DynaMed, and DrugBank. Interactions were categorized by severity as mild, moderate or severe.ResultsOf 141 medicinal plants reviewed, 28 were documented as interacting with warfarin in at least one of the four assessed CDRs. DynaMed reported interactions for 18 plants, ClinicalKey for 15, UpToDate for 13, and DrugBank for 3. Only one plant (Ginseng - <i>Panax ginseng</i>) was consistently identified across all CDRs, although discrepancies in the direction of the interaction (whether it increased or decreased anticoagulant effect) were observed. Regarding interaction severity classifications, there was substantial variability, with ClinicalKey identifying the highest proportion of severe interactions (32.1%).ConclusionWe identified significant variability among CDRs in reporting interactions between warfarin and medicinal plants, which may lead to inconsistencies in clinical decision-making. To ensure more consistent and reliable patient care, standardized and comprehensive methodologies for assessing these interactions are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15714,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine","volume":"30 ","pages":"2515690X251334445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515690X251334445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundWarfarin, a commonly used anticoagulant, interacts with medicinal plants, potentially complicating patient management. Clinical Decision Resources (CDRs) provide guidance on these interactions, but inconsistencies across resources may impact clinical decisions. This study aims to evaluate the consistency of interaction reports between warfarin and medicinal plants across four online CDRs.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted. Medicinal plants assessed were selected from the World Health Organization's Phytotherapy Manual. Interaction reports were manually reviewed across four CDRs: UpToDate, ClinicalKey, DynaMed, and DrugBank. Interactions were categorized by severity as mild, moderate or severe.ResultsOf 141 medicinal plants reviewed, 28 were documented as interacting with warfarin in at least one of the four assessed CDRs. DynaMed reported interactions for 18 plants, ClinicalKey for 15, UpToDate for 13, and DrugBank for 3. Only one plant (Ginseng - Panax ginseng) was consistently identified across all CDRs, although discrepancies in the direction of the interaction (whether it increased or decreased anticoagulant effect) were observed. Regarding interaction severity classifications, there was substantial variability, with ClinicalKey identifying the highest proportion of severe interactions (32.1%).ConclusionWe identified significant variability among CDRs in reporting interactions between warfarin and medicinal plants, which may lead to inconsistencies in clinical decision-making. To ensure more consistent and reliable patient care, standardized and comprehensive methodologies for assessing these interactions are needed.

临床决策支持资源中华法林和药用植物相互作用的不一致报告。
华法林是一种常用的抗凝血剂,与药用植物相互作用,可能使患者管理复杂化。临床决策资源(cdr)为这些相互作用提供指导,但资源之间的不一致性可能会影响临床决策。本研究旨在评估四种在线cdr中华法林与药用植物相互作用报告的一致性。方法采用横断面研究。所评估的药用植物选自世界卫生组织的《植物疗法手册》。通过四个cdr手动审查交互报告:UpToDate、ClinicalKey、DynaMed和DrugBank。相互作用按严重程度分为轻度、中度和严重。结果141种药用植物中,有28种与华法林相互作用,至少有一种与华法林相互作用。DynaMed报告了18种植物的相互作用,ClinicalKey报告了15种,UpToDate报告了13种,DrugBank报告了3种。在所有cdr中,只有一种植物(人参-人参)被一致地鉴定出来,尽管在相互作用的方向(是否增加或减少抗凝血作用)上观察到差异。关于相互作用严重程度的分类,存在很大的可变性,ClinicalKey确定了最高比例的严重相互作用(32.1%)。结论:cdr在华法林与药用植物相互作用的报告中存在显著差异,这可能导致临床决策的不一致。为了确保更加一致和可靠的病人护理,需要标准化和全面的方法来评估这些相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine
Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信