Extending the timing for secondary cytoreductive surgery after second-line chemotherapy in relapsed ovarian cancer: the EXTENSION study.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Carmine Conte, Luigi Congedo, Claudia Marchetti, Francesca Romana Scanu, Giulia Parise, Valentina Ghirardi, Andrea Rosati, Giovanni Scambia, Anna Fagotti
{"title":"Extending the timing for secondary cytoreductive surgery after second-line chemotherapy in relapsed ovarian cancer: the EXTENSION study.","authors":"Carmine Conte, Luigi Congedo, Claudia Marchetti, Francesca Romana Scanu, Giulia Parise, Valentina Ghirardi, Andrea Rosati, Giovanni Scambia, Anna Fagotti","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Relapse remains a major issue for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Based on the DESKTOP III trial, international guidelines recommend secondary cytoreduction surgery when feasible before starting chemotherapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. Currently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy before secondary cytoreduction surgery is not advised outside of clinical trials. Recently, CHIPOR trial has shown the efficacy of secondary cytoreduction surgery with hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in an unselected population with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. The primary aim of this study was to assess the rate of potential delayed secondary cytoreduction surgery after 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, monocentric, observational study included patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer deemed unsuitable for secondary cytoreductive surgery after evaluation by a multidisciplinary tumor board and/or diagnostic laparoscopy from January 2020 to December 2023. After 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, secondary cytoreduction surgery feasibility was evaluated by applying criteria for upfront secondary cytoreduction surgery in patients with at least a partial response at computed tomography scan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 522 patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer were evaluated; 165 were considered unsuitable for upfront secondary cytoreduction surgery and received second-line chemotherapy. After 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, secondary cytoreduction surgery was considered feasible in 48 patients (29.1%, group A), while 117 patients (70.9%, group B) remained ineligible for surgery. Predictors of secondary cytoreduction surgery feasibility were analyzed. Multivariate analysis identified a favorable modeled CA125 elimination rate constant K score at second-line chemotherapy (OR 7.29, 95% CI 2.91 to 18.30, p < .001) as the only independent predictor. Patients eligible for delayed secondary cytoreduction surgery showed significantly longer progression-free survival 2 and post-relapse survival (median progression-free survival 2 12.5 vs 7.9, p < .001; median post-relapse survival: not reached vs 28.5, p = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a real-life approach in a tertiary oncological center, we showed that around 30% of women with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, initially deemed unsuitable for secondary cytoreduction surgery, can potentially undergo delayed secondary cytoreduction surgery following a favorable response to 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"101824"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101824","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Relapse remains a major issue for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Based on the DESKTOP III trial, international guidelines recommend secondary cytoreduction surgery when feasible before starting chemotherapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. Currently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy before secondary cytoreduction surgery is not advised outside of clinical trials. Recently, CHIPOR trial has shown the efficacy of secondary cytoreduction surgery with hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in an unselected population with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. The primary aim of this study was to assess the rate of potential delayed secondary cytoreduction surgery after 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods: This retrospective, monocentric, observational study included patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer deemed unsuitable for secondary cytoreductive surgery after evaluation by a multidisciplinary tumor board and/or diagnostic laparoscopy from January 2020 to December 2023. After 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, secondary cytoreduction surgery feasibility was evaluated by applying criteria for upfront secondary cytoreduction surgery in patients with at least a partial response at computed tomography scan.

Results: Overall, 522 patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer were evaluated; 165 were considered unsuitable for upfront secondary cytoreduction surgery and received second-line chemotherapy. After 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, secondary cytoreduction surgery was considered feasible in 48 patients (29.1%, group A), while 117 patients (70.9%, group B) remained ineligible for surgery. Predictors of secondary cytoreduction surgery feasibility were analyzed. Multivariate analysis identified a favorable modeled CA125 elimination rate constant K score at second-line chemotherapy (OR 7.29, 95% CI 2.91 to 18.30, p < .001) as the only independent predictor. Patients eligible for delayed secondary cytoreduction surgery showed significantly longer progression-free survival 2 and post-relapse survival (median progression-free survival 2 12.5 vs 7.9, p < .001; median post-relapse survival: not reached vs 28.5, p = .002).

Conclusions: In a real-life approach in a tertiary oncological center, we showed that around 30% of women with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, initially deemed unsuitable for secondary cytoreduction surgery, can potentially undergo delayed secondary cytoreduction surgery following a favorable response to 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

延长复发卵巢癌二线化疗后二次细胞减少手术的时机:EXTENSION研究。
目的:复发仍然是晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者的主要问题。基于DESKTOP III试验,国际指南建议铂敏感复发卵巢癌患者在化疗开始前进行二次细胞减少手术。目前,除临床试验外,不建议在二次细胞减少手术前进行新辅助化疗。最近,CHIPOR试验显示,在未选择的铂敏感复发卵巢癌患者中,新辅助化疗后,二次细胞减少手术联合腹膜内高温化疗的疗效。本研究的主要目的是评估新辅助化疗6个周期后潜在的延迟二次细胞减少手术的比率。方法:这项回顾性、单中心、观察性研究纳入了2020年1月至2023年12月期间,经多学科肿瘤委员会和/或诊断性腹腔镜评估后认为不适合进行二次细胞减少手术的铂敏感复发卵巢癌患者。在6个周期的新辅助化疗后,通过应用计算机断层扫描至少有部分反应的患者的前期二次细胞减少手术的标准来评估二次细胞减少手术的可行性。结果:总共评估了522例铂敏感复发卵巢癌患者;165例患者认为不适合进行前期二次细胞减少手术,并接受了二线化疗。新辅助化疗6个周期后,48例患者(29.1%,A组)认为二次细胞减少手术可行,117例患者(70.9%,B组)仍不适合手术。分析二次细胞减少手术可行性的预测因素。多变量分析发现,在二线化疗中,有利的模型CA125消除率常数K评分(OR 7.29, 95% CI 2.91至18.30,p < .001)是唯一的独立预测因子。符合延迟继发性细胞减少手术条件的患者无进展生存期2和复发后生存期显著延长(中位无进展生存期2 12.5 vs 7.9, p < 0.001;复发后中位生存期:未达到28.5,p = 0.002)。结论:在三级肿瘤中心的一项现实研究中,我们发现大约30%的铂敏感复发卵巢癌患者最初被认为不适合进行二次细胞减少手术,在对6个周期的新辅助化疗有良好反应后,可能会接受延迟的二次细胞减少手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信