Facelift Photo Quality on Social Media: Prevalence of Potentially Misleading Before-and-After Images.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Mitesh P Mehta, Shervin Eskandari, William E Long, Nathaniel Neptune, Anita B Sethna, David W Chou
{"title":"Facelift Photo Quality on Social Media: Prevalence of Potentially Misleading Before-and-After Images.","authors":"Mitesh P Mehta, Shervin Eskandari, William E Long, Nathaniel Neptune, Anita B Sethna, David W Chou","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2025.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Social media posts of patients before and after facelifts have grown in popularity, with platforms such as Instagram (Menlo Park, CA) allowing surgeons to showcase their work, which may impact patient expectations and physician ethics. <b>Objective:</b> This study aims to compare image quality and discrepancies between social media before-and-after photosets of patients who underwent facelift surgery, as measured by size, rotation, brightness, and other characteristics in an image review. <b>Design:</b> Cross-sectional. <b>Methods:</b> A query of Instagram posts tagged \"#faceliftbeforeandafter\" was screened to identify 567 posts featuring side-by-side pre- and postoperative images meeting inclusion criteria. Data on image backgrounds, makeup differences, geographic region, and time since surgery were recorded. Face size, rotation, and brightness were objectively compared between pre- and postoperative photos. <b>Results:</b> Among the analyzed posts, 66.3% featured smaller postoperative faces (mean decrease of 3.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and 73.7% of postoperative photos displayed upward facial rotation. Significant deviations in size and rotation (≥10%) were observed in 15.2% and 10.5% of posts, respectively. Brightness increases ≥10% were noted in 36.9% of postoperative posts. Inconsistent image backgrounds and makeup differences were present in 22.5% of photosets. 85.7% of surgeons posting were based in the United States, and 21.2% of posts occurred within three months after the facelift. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study highlights that only 25% of posts were of high quality, revealing substantial inconsistencies in Instagram (Menlo Park, CA) facelift before-and-after posts with discrepancies that exaggerate improved postoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2025.0043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social media posts of patients before and after facelifts have grown in popularity, with platforms such as Instagram (Menlo Park, CA) allowing surgeons to showcase their work, which may impact patient expectations and physician ethics. Objective: This study aims to compare image quality and discrepancies between social media before-and-after photosets of patients who underwent facelift surgery, as measured by size, rotation, brightness, and other characteristics in an image review. Design: Cross-sectional. Methods: A query of Instagram posts tagged "#faceliftbeforeandafter" was screened to identify 567 posts featuring side-by-side pre- and postoperative images meeting inclusion criteria. Data on image backgrounds, makeup differences, geographic region, and time since surgery were recorded. Face size, rotation, and brightness were objectively compared between pre- and postoperative photos. Results: Among the analyzed posts, 66.3% featured smaller postoperative faces (mean decrease of 3.1%, p < 0.001), and 73.7% of postoperative photos displayed upward facial rotation. Significant deviations in size and rotation (≥10%) were observed in 15.2% and 10.5% of posts, respectively. Brightness increases ≥10% were noted in 36.9% of postoperative posts. Inconsistent image backgrounds and makeup differences were present in 22.5% of photosets. 85.7% of surgeons posting were based in the United States, and 21.2% of posts occurred within three months after the facelift. Conclusion: This study highlights that only 25% of posts were of high quality, revealing substantial inconsistencies in Instagram (Menlo Park, CA) facelift before-and-after posts with discrepancies that exaggerate improved postoperative outcomes.

社交媒体上的整容照片质量:潜在的误导前后图像的流行。
背景:患者整容前后的社交媒体帖子越来越受欢迎,Instagram (Menlo Park, CA)等平台允许外科医生展示他们的工作,这可能会影响患者的期望和医生的道德。目的:本研究旨在通过图像回顾中的大小、旋转、亮度和其他特征来比较接受整容手术的患者在社交媒体上前后照片的图像质量和差异。设计:横断面。方法:筛选标记为“#faceliftbeforeandafter”的Instagram帖子的查询,以确定567个具有符合纳入标准的并排术前和术后图像的帖子。记录手术后的图像背景、化妆差异、地理区域和时间数据。客观地比较术前和术后照片的面部大小、旋转和亮度。结果:在分析的帖子中,66.3%的帖子术后面部变小(平均下降3.1%,p < 0.001), 73.7%的帖子术后面部向上旋转。15.2%和10.5%的岗位在规模和轮换上存在显著偏差(≥10%)。36.9%的术后贴片亮度增加≥10%。22.5%的照片存在图像背景不一致和化妆差异。85.7%的外科医生在美国发帖,21.2%的发帖发生在整容手术后的三个月内。结论:本研究强调,只有25%的帖子是高质量的,揭示了Instagram (Menlo Park, CA)整容前后帖子的实质性不一致,这种不一致夸大了术后改善的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
30.00%
发文量
159
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信