A health literate evaluation of a reproductive health education program for young men with sickle cell disease.

Q2 Social Sciences
Megan M Griffith, Joseph Walden, Sophia M Liles, Zachary A Colton, Mary Ann Abrams, Ben McCorkle, Albert Phillips, Toyetta Barnard-Kirk, Leena Nahata, Susan E Creary
{"title":"A health literate evaluation of a reproductive health education program for young men with sickle cell disease.","authors":"Megan M Griffith, Joseph Walden, Sophia M Liles, Zachary A Colton, Mary Ann Abrams, Ben McCorkle, Albert Phillips, Toyetta Barnard-Kirk, Leena Nahata, Susan E Creary","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2025.2490419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health literacy (HL) is known to be low among those with sickle cell disease (SCD). Reproductive health knowledge gaps exist among those with SCD, which drove the research team to create an education tool for adolescent males entitled, 'Fertility edUcaTion to Understand ReproductivE health in Sickle cell disease' (FUTURES) in 2023. This study sought to evaluate and revise FUTURES using HL tools and a community-advised review to improve clarity, understandability, actionability, and relatability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four evaluators conducted a HL assessment of the original and revised FUTURES programs using the Patient Education Assessment Tool for Audio/Visual Materials (PEMAT-AV) and the modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clear Communication Index (CDC-CCI-modified). Paired samples t-tests were used to compare PEMAT-AV and CDC-CCI-modified scores between the original and revised versions of FUTURES. Community advisory board feedback identified opportunities to improve program design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HL assessment revealed high HL demand of the original FUTURES program. The revised program had significantly higher understandability and clarity scores and was re-designed to be more engaging and representative of the intended audience. However, the CDC-CCI-modified score fell below the recommended threshold and actionability remained unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study outlined an approach that prioritized HL and community voices when revising an education tool, which could be used in future efforts to design accessible and relatable patient education materials for this population and others. More work is needed to evaluate the impact of the HL revision process on patient knowledge and outcomes for this and other at-risk patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2025.2490419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health literacy (HL) is known to be low among those with sickle cell disease (SCD). Reproductive health knowledge gaps exist among those with SCD, which drove the research team to create an education tool for adolescent males entitled, 'Fertility edUcaTion to Understand ReproductivE health in Sickle cell disease' (FUTURES) in 2023. This study sought to evaluate and revise FUTURES using HL tools and a community-advised review to improve clarity, understandability, actionability, and relatability.

Methods: Four evaluators conducted a HL assessment of the original and revised FUTURES programs using the Patient Education Assessment Tool for Audio/Visual Materials (PEMAT-AV) and the modified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clear Communication Index (CDC-CCI-modified). Paired samples t-tests were used to compare PEMAT-AV and CDC-CCI-modified scores between the original and revised versions of FUTURES. Community advisory board feedback identified opportunities to improve program design.

Results: HL assessment revealed high HL demand of the original FUTURES program. The revised program had significantly higher understandability and clarity scores and was re-designed to be more engaging and representative of the intended audience. However, the CDC-CCI-modified score fell below the recommended threshold and actionability remained unchanged.

Conclusions: This study outlined an approach that prioritized HL and community voices when revising an education tool, which could be used in future efforts to design accessible and relatable patient education materials for this population and others. More work is needed to evaluate the impact of the HL revision process on patient knowledge and outcomes for this and other at-risk patient populations.

对镰状细胞病青年男子生殖健康教育方案的健康素养评价。
背景:镰状细胞病(SCD)患者的健康素养(HL)较低。SCD患者的生殖健康知识存在差距,这促使研究小组在2023年为青少年男性创建了名为“了解镰状细胞病生殖健康的生育教育”(FUTURES)的教育工具。本研究试图使用HL工具和社区建议的回顾来评估和修订未来,以提高清晰度、可理解性、可操作性和相关性。方法:四名评估人员使用视听材料患者教育评估工具(PEMAT-AV)和修改后的疾病控制与预防中心明确沟通指数(CDC-CCI-modified)对原始和修订后的期货计划进行HL评估。配对样本t检验用于比较原始版本和修订版本的期货之间的PEMAT-AV和cdc - cci修改得分。社区咨询委员会的反馈确定了改进项目设计的机会。结果:HL评估显示原期货项目对HL的需求较高。修订后的节目有明显更高的可理解性和清晰度得分,并被重新设计为更有吸引力和更能代表目标受众。然而,cdc - cci修正评分低于推荐阈值,可操作性保持不变。结论:本研究概述了一种在修订教育工具时优先考虑HL和社区声音的方法,该方法可用于未来为该人群和其他人群设计可访问且相关的患者教育材料。需要更多的工作来评估HL修订过程对患者知识和结果的影响,这些患者和其他高危患者人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信