[Remediation of Antimony-polluted Soil Using Iron Sulfide-modified Biochar and Stability Assessment After Remediation].

Q2 Environmental Science
Sen Zhang, Qing-Yu Li, Deng-Ling Jiang, Ying Cao, Cun-Fu Gao, Tian Meng, Qiang Li
{"title":"[Remediation of Antimony-polluted Soil Using Iron Sulfide-modified Biochar and Stability Assessment After Remediation].","authors":"Sen Zhang, Qing-Yu Li, Deng-Ling Jiang, Ying Cao, Cun-Fu Gao, Tian Meng, Qiang Li","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202403018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the remediation effects and mechanisms of iron sulfide-modified biochar (FeS-BC) on polluted soil surrounding an antimony smelting plant, soil from around a decommissioned antimony smelting plant in the Qinglong County, Guizhou Province, was used as the research subject. Through soil cultivation experiments, the effects of raw biochar (BC) and iron sulfide-modified biochar (FeS-BC) on the leaching toxicity, bioavailability, and speciation of antimony (Sb) in the soil were compared. The results showed that with an FeS∶BC mass ratio of 1∶5 and an addition rate of 7%, the average stabilization efficiency of Sb in soils with varying degrees of Sb pollution (G1-G6) reached 66.85%. FeS-BC maintained high Sb stabilization efficiency across a wide pH range (2.0-10.0). In soils treated with a certain proportion of BC, the leaching concentration and bioavailable content of Sb fluctuated during the remediation process, decreasing by 5.89%±3.04% (1.44%-9.08%) and 20.49%±17.74% (4.83%-58.39%), respectively, after 60 days of remediation. In contrast, FeS-BC effectively reduced the leaching concentration and bioavailable content of Sb throughout the remediation period, with reductions of 35.80%±13.80% (17.78%-55.05%) and 34.84%±2.28% (31.60%-37.64%), respectively, after 60 days of remediation. The stabilization mechanisms of Sb in soil by FeS-BC included electrostatic attraction, ion exchange, redox reactions, complexation, and precipitation. After 14 days of remediation with BC and FeS-BC, soils with varying Sb pollution levels (G1-G6) were subjected to alternating wet and dry conditions and freeze-thaw cycles. The leachate concentration and bioavailable content of Sb in soils remediated with BC increased, indicating a certain release risk. In contrast, in soils remediated with FeS-BC, while the leachate concentration of Sb increased, the bioavailable content decreased.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 4","pages":"2525-2536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202403018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the remediation effects and mechanisms of iron sulfide-modified biochar (FeS-BC) on polluted soil surrounding an antimony smelting plant, soil from around a decommissioned antimony smelting plant in the Qinglong County, Guizhou Province, was used as the research subject. Through soil cultivation experiments, the effects of raw biochar (BC) and iron sulfide-modified biochar (FeS-BC) on the leaching toxicity, bioavailability, and speciation of antimony (Sb) in the soil were compared. The results showed that with an FeS∶BC mass ratio of 1∶5 and an addition rate of 7%, the average stabilization efficiency of Sb in soils with varying degrees of Sb pollution (G1-G6) reached 66.85%. FeS-BC maintained high Sb stabilization efficiency across a wide pH range (2.0-10.0). In soils treated with a certain proportion of BC, the leaching concentration and bioavailable content of Sb fluctuated during the remediation process, decreasing by 5.89%±3.04% (1.44%-9.08%) and 20.49%±17.74% (4.83%-58.39%), respectively, after 60 days of remediation. In contrast, FeS-BC effectively reduced the leaching concentration and bioavailable content of Sb throughout the remediation period, with reductions of 35.80%±13.80% (17.78%-55.05%) and 34.84%±2.28% (31.60%-37.64%), respectively, after 60 days of remediation. The stabilization mechanisms of Sb in soil by FeS-BC included electrostatic attraction, ion exchange, redox reactions, complexation, and precipitation. After 14 days of remediation with BC and FeS-BC, soils with varying Sb pollution levels (G1-G6) were subjected to alternating wet and dry conditions and freeze-thaw cycles. The leachate concentration and bioavailable content of Sb in soils remediated with BC increased, indicating a certain release risk. In contrast, in soils remediated with FeS-BC, while the leachate concentration of Sb increased, the bioavailable content decreased.

[硫化铁改性生物炭修复锑污染土壤及修复后稳定性评价]。
为研究硫化铁改性生物炭(FeS-BC)对某锑冶炼厂周边污染土壤的修复效果及机理,以贵州省青龙县某锑冶炼厂周边废弃土壤为研究对象。通过土壤栽培试验,比较了生生物炭(BC)和硫化铁改性生物炭(FeS-BC)对土壤中锑(Sb)的淋溶毒性、生物有效性和形态的影响。结果表明:在FeS∶BC质量比为1∶5、添加量为7%的条件下,Sb在不同Sb污染程度(g1 ~ g6)土壤中的平均稳定效率为66.85%;FeS-BC在较宽的pH范围(2.0-10.0)内保持了较高的Sb稳定效率。在添加一定比例BC的土壤中,Sb的浸出浓度和生物有效含量在修复过程中呈波动趋势,在修复60 d后分别下降了5.89%±3.04%(1.44% ~ 9.08%)和20.49%±17.74%(4.83% ~ 58.39%)。在整个修复过程中,FeS-BC有效降低了Sb的浸出浓度和生物可利用含量,修复60 d后分别降低了35.80%±13.80%(17.78% ~ 55.05%)和34.84%±2.28%(31.60% ~ 37.64%)。FeS-BC在土壤中稳定Sb的机理包括静电吸引、离子交换、氧化还原反应、络合和沉淀。经过14 d的BC和FeS-BC修复后,不同Sb污染水平(G1-G6)的土壤经历了干湿交替和冻融循环。BC修复后土壤渗滤液浓度和Sb生物有效含量增加,表明有一定的释放风险。与此相反,在FeS-BC修复的土壤中,随着渗滤液中Sb浓度的增加,生物可利用性含量降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信