Performance of a virtual assistant based on ChatGPT-4 in the diagnosis of syndromes with orofacial manifestations.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Marcos Paulo Maia-Lima, Livian Isabel de Medeiros Carvalho, Eduarda Gomes Onofre de Araújo, Hélder Domiciano Dantas Martins, Renato Assis Machado, Livia Maria Ferreira Sobrinho, Hercílio Martelli-Júnior, Paulo Rogério Ferreti Bonan
{"title":"Performance of a virtual assistant based on ChatGPT-4 in the diagnosis of syndromes with orofacial manifestations.","authors":"Marcos Paulo Maia-Lima, Livian Isabel de Medeiros Carvalho, Eduarda Gomes Onofre de Araújo, Hélder Domiciano Dantas Martins, Renato Assis Machado, Livia Maria Ferreira Sobrinho, Hercílio Martelli-Júnior, Paulo Rogério Ferreti Bonan","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of the virtual assistant \"Syndromic Diseases and Orofacial Features\" (SDOF), developed based on the Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 model, in formulating diagnostic hypotheses and recommendations for syndromes with orofacial manifestations.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Twenty-six anonymized, previously diagnosed clinical cases, including clinical features and images, were selected. The assistant was trained using scientific references and configured to generate diagnostic hypotheses and suggest complementary exams. The responses were evaluated by two oral diagnosis specialists based on criteria such as accuracy, completeness, relevance, and comprehensibility. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio software to calculate means and standard deviations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SDOF correctly identified 96.2% of the cases, with 80.8% being the first diagnostic hypothesis and 15.4% being the second. In only one case (3.8%), the correct diagnosis was presented as the third hypothesis. The assistant performed best in the criteria \"Relevance,\" \"Practicality,\" and \"Readability,\" while \"Completeness\" and \"Up-to-dateness\" scored the lowest. Despite the high accuracy rate, the assistant failed to mention all diagnostic steps in 7.69% of the cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SDOF demonstrated significant potential to assist in the diagnosis of orofacial syndromes, with promising accuracy rates. However, the tool still requires professional supervision and improvements in completeness and up-to-dateness.</p>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2025.04.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of the virtual assistant "Syndromic Diseases and Orofacial Features" (SDOF), developed based on the Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 model, in formulating diagnostic hypotheses and recommendations for syndromes with orofacial manifestations.

Study design: Twenty-six anonymized, previously diagnosed clinical cases, including clinical features and images, were selected. The assistant was trained using scientific references and configured to generate diagnostic hypotheses and suggest complementary exams. The responses were evaluated by two oral diagnosis specialists based on criteria such as accuracy, completeness, relevance, and comprehensibility. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio software to calculate means and standard deviations.

Results: The SDOF correctly identified 96.2% of the cases, with 80.8% being the first diagnostic hypothesis and 15.4% being the second. In only one case (3.8%), the correct diagnosis was presented as the third hypothesis. The assistant performed best in the criteria "Relevance," "Practicality," and "Readability," while "Completeness" and "Up-to-dateness" scored the lowest. Despite the high accuracy rate, the assistant failed to mention all diagnostic steps in 7.69% of the cases.

Conclusions: The SDOF demonstrated significant potential to assist in the diagnosis of orofacial syndromes, with promising accuracy rates. However, the tool still requires professional supervision and improvements in completeness and up-to-dateness.

基于ChatGPT-4的虚拟助手在口腔面部症状诊断中的表现。
目的:评价基于生成式预训练Transformer 4模型开发的虚拟助手“综合征性疾病和口腔面部特征”(SDOF)在制定具有口腔面部表现的综合征的诊断假设和建议方面的表现。研究设计:选择26例匿名的、以前诊断过的临床病例,包括临床特征和图像。该助手接受了科学参考文献的训练,并被配置为生成诊断假设并建议补充检查。应答由两位口腔诊断专家根据准确性、完整性、相关性和可理解性等标准进行评估。采用RStudio软件进行统计分析,计算平均值和标准差。结果:SDOF正确率为96.2%,其中第一诊断假设为80.8%,第二诊断假设为15.4%。只有一个病例(3.8%)的正确诊断是第三种假设。助手在“相关性”、“实用性”和“可读性”方面表现最好,而“完整性”和“最新性”得分最低。尽管准确率很高,但在7.69%的病例中,助手未能提及所有诊断步骤。结论:SDOF在帮助诊断口面部综合征方面表现出显著的潜力,具有良好的准确率。然而,该工具仍然需要专业的监督,并在完整性和最新性方面进行改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
1217
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信