The Effect and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Administration on Mother and Foetus/Neonates During General Anaesthesia in Caesarean Section: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2025.2495089
Zhiqiang Yu, Yan Liu, Fangqi Duan, Qian Li, Dong Yan, Li Zhang, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Minyu Zhang, Qi Zhao
{"title":"The Effect and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Administration on Mother and Foetus/Neonates During General Anaesthesia in Caesarean Section: A Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Zhiqiang Yu, Yan Liu, Fangqi Duan, Qian Li, Dong Yan, Li Zhang, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Minyu Zhang, Qi Zhao","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2025.2495089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the safety of dexmedetomidine administration to mothers, fetuses, and neonates during general anesthesia in cesarean section (CS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 60 parturients scheduled for elective CS under general anesthesia were randomly divided into anesthesia in groups (DEX1 and DEX2) and control (C) groups. Groups DEX1 and DEX2 were induced with dexmedetomidine (induction, 0.4 µg/kg; maintenance, 0.4 µg/kg·h) and dexmedetomidine (induction, 0.6 µg/kg; maintenance, 0.6 µg/kg·h), respectively, until birth. Equivalent volumes of normal saline were administered in group C. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and rocuronium in all groups. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of parturients were monitored and recorded; fetal HR was monitored using color doppler ultrasound. The blood gas analysis from the umbilical artery (UA) and umbilical vein (UV), along with the HR, Apgar score and Neurologic Adaptive Capacity Scores (NACS) of neonates, were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maternal MAP at intubation/skin incision, maternal HR at intubation/skin incision and delivery were significantly lower in groups DEX1 and DEX2 than in group C, no significant differences were observed between groups DEX1 and DEX2. No significant differences were observed in fetal HR, UA and UV blood gas analyses, Apgar score and NACS of neonates in the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous 0.4 or 0.6 µg/kg doses of dexmedetomidine with propofol for general anesthesia in CS is beneficial for inhibiting the maternal stress response induced by intubation/skin incision and delivery without significant adverse effects on fetuses or neonates. Our findings suggest that dexmedetomidine is safe for mothers, fetuses, and neonates in obstetric general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":"38 1","pages":"2495089"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2025.2495089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the safety of dexmedetomidine administration to mothers, fetuses, and neonates during general anesthesia in cesarean section (CS).

Patients and methods: A total of 60 parturients scheduled for elective CS under general anesthesia were randomly divided into anesthesia in groups (DEX1 and DEX2) and control (C) groups. Groups DEX1 and DEX2 were induced with dexmedetomidine (induction, 0.4 µg/kg; maintenance, 0.4 µg/kg·h) and dexmedetomidine (induction, 0.6 µg/kg; maintenance, 0.6 µg/kg·h), respectively, until birth. Equivalent volumes of normal saline were administered in group C. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and rocuronium in all groups. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of parturients were monitored and recorded; fetal HR was monitored using color doppler ultrasound. The blood gas analysis from the umbilical artery (UA) and umbilical vein (UV), along with the HR, Apgar score and Neurologic Adaptive Capacity Scores (NACS) of neonates, were recorded.

Results: Maternal MAP at intubation/skin incision, maternal HR at intubation/skin incision and delivery were significantly lower in groups DEX1 and DEX2 than in group C, no significant differences were observed between groups DEX1 and DEX2. No significant differences were observed in fetal HR, UA and UV blood gas analyses, Apgar score and NACS of neonates in the three groups.

Conclusion: Intravenous 0.4 or 0.6 µg/kg doses of dexmedetomidine with propofol for general anesthesia in CS is beneficial for inhibiting the maternal stress response induced by intubation/skin incision and delivery without significant adverse effects on fetuses or neonates. Our findings suggest that dexmedetomidine is safe for mothers, fetuses, and neonates in obstetric general anesthesia.

剖宫产全麻期间右美托咪定给药对母亲和胎儿/新生儿的影响及安全性:一项随机对照试验
目的:本研究旨在评估剖宫产术(CS)全麻下给药右美托咪定对母亲、胎儿和新生儿的安全性。患者和方法:选择60例全麻下择期CS产妇,随机分为麻醉组(DEX1、DEX2)和对照组(C)。DEX1、DEX2组用右美托咪定诱导(诱导量0.4µg/kg;维持,0.4µg/kg·h)和右美托咪定(诱导,0.6µg/kg;维持,分别为0.6µg/kg·h),直至出生。c组给予等量生理盐水,各组均以异丙酚和罗库溴铵麻醉。监测并记录产妇平均动脉血压(MAP)和心率(HR);采用彩色多普勒超声监测胎儿HR。记录新生儿脐动脉(UA)、脐静脉(UV)血气分析及HR、Apgar评分、神经适应能力评分(NACS)。结果:DEX1组和DEX2组插管/皮肤切口时产妇MAP、插管/皮肤切口及分娩时产妇HR均显著低于C组,DEX1组与DEX2组间差异无统计学意义。三组胎儿HR、UA、UV血气分析、Apgar评分、新生儿NACS比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:静脉注射0.4或0.6µg/kg剂量的右美托咪定联合异丙酚用于CS全麻有利于抑制插管/破皮及分娩引起的产妇应激反应,对胎儿或新生儿无明显不良影响。我们的研究结果表明,右美托咪定在产科全身麻醉中对母亲、胎儿和新生儿都是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信