The Effect of Single Leg Romanian Deadlift on the Risk of Hamstring Strain Injuries in Track and Field Athletes: A Cohort Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-05-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.136803
Ryo Otani, Hideo Nishikawa, Shigeaki Matsunaga, Yosuke Hiroshige, Masatoshi Nakamura
{"title":"The Effect of Single Leg Romanian Deadlift on the Risk of Hamstring Strain Injuries in Track and Field Athletes: A Cohort Study.","authors":"Ryo Otani, Hideo Nishikawa, Shigeaki Matsunaga, Yosuke Hiroshige, Masatoshi Nakamura","doi":"10.26603/001c.136803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Hamstring strain injury (HSI) is a particularly significant problem in track and field events. In recent years, it has been recommended that the Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) be included as part of an HSI prevention program, along with warm-up. However, NHE has low compliance because of various disadvantages. Therefore, we focused on Single-leg Romanian Deadlift (SLRDL) as an alternative to NHE. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the SLRDL on the risk of HSI.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male and female high school track athletes were recruited to participate across control and intervention seasons. The intervention added the SLRDL (3 sets x 3 reps) to the standard warm-up. An athletic trainer recorded HSI based on established criteria and athlete-hours. HSI incidence per 1000 athlete-hours and severity (by return-to-training time) were compared between seasons. Athletes filled out a compliance questionnaire after the intervention season. Risk ratios (RR) were examined for each severity of HSI between the control season and the intervention season.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven athletes from one high school track and field team participated. The risk of mild to moderate HSI was reduced between the control and intervention seasons (RR = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-0.94) but no there was no significant effect on severe cases (RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 0.30-27.28). Compliance with SLRDL was 98.67%, indicating its potential as an easily implemented prevention program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the effect of the SLRDL in reducing the risk of mild to moderate NHE, the lower intensity of the SLRDL compared with NHE might have limited its effectiveness in reducing the risk of severe HSI. Further research is recommended to optimize HSI prevention programs, considering the use of the SLRDL as an introductory measure rather than a complete alternative to the NHE.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 5","pages":"657-665"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.136803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Hamstring strain injury (HSI) is a particularly significant problem in track and field events. In recent years, it has been recommended that the Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) be included as part of an HSI prevention program, along with warm-up. However, NHE has low compliance because of various disadvantages. Therefore, we focused on Single-leg Romanian Deadlift (SLRDL) as an alternative to NHE. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the SLRDL on the risk of HSI.

Study design: Cohort study.

Methods: Male and female high school track athletes were recruited to participate across control and intervention seasons. The intervention added the SLRDL (3 sets x 3 reps) to the standard warm-up. An athletic trainer recorded HSI based on established criteria and athlete-hours. HSI incidence per 1000 athlete-hours and severity (by return-to-training time) were compared between seasons. Athletes filled out a compliance questionnaire after the intervention season. Risk ratios (RR) were examined for each severity of HSI between the control season and the intervention season.

Results: Seventy-seven athletes from one high school track and field team participated. The risk of mild to moderate HSI was reduced between the control and intervention seasons (RR = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-0.94) but no there was no significant effect on severe cases (RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 0.30-27.28). Compliance with SLRDL was 98.67%, indicating its potential as an easily implemented prevention program.

Conclusions: Despite the effect of the SLRDL in reducing the risk of mild to moderate NHE, the lower intensity of the SLRDL compared with NHE might have limited its effectiveness in reducing the risk of severe HSI. Further research is recommended to optimize HSI prevention programs, considering the use of the SLRDL as an introductory measure rather than a complete alternative to the NHE.

Level of evidence: 3.

单腿罗马尼亚式硬举对田径运动员腿筋拉伤风险的影响:一项队列研究。
背景与目的:腿筋拉伤(HSI)是田径项目中一个特别重要的问题。近年来,人们建议将北欧腿筋运动(NHE)与热身运动一起作为HSI预防计划的一部分。然而,由于各种缺点,NHE的顺应性较低。因此,我们专注于单腿罗马尼亚硬举(SLRDL)作为NHE的替代方案。本研究的目的是检验SLRDL对HSI风险的影响。研究设计:队列研究。方法:在控制季和干预季分别招募高中男女田径运动员。干预将SLRDL(3组x 3次)添加到标准热身中。运动教练根据既定标准和运动员小时数记录HSI。每1000个运动员小时的HSI发生率和严重程度(通过恢复训练时间)在不同季节之间进行比较。运动员在干预赛季结束后填写了一份依从性问卷。在对照季节和干预季节之间,检查HSI各严重程度的风险比(RR)。结果:某高中田径队77名运动员参加。在对照组和干预期间,轻度至中度HSI的风险降低(RR = 0.34, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.12-0.94),但对重度病例没有显著影响(RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 0.30-27.28)。SLRDL的依从性为98.67%,表明其具有易于实施的预防方案的潜力。结论:尽管SLRDL在降低轻度至中度HSI风险方面有作用,但与NHE相比,SLRDL的较低强度可能限制了其降低严重HSI风险的有效性。建议进一步研究以优化HSI预防方案,考虑使用SLRDL作为介绍性措施,而不是完全替代NHE。证据等级:3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信