Side-Lying Position Is Associated With Improved Swallow Outcomes When Compared to Semi-Upright Position in Infants With Dysphagia.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Robert Brinton Fujiki, Abigail Nimtz, Susan L Thibeault
{"title":"Side-Lying Position Is Associated With Improved Swallow Outcomes When Compared to Semi-Upright Position in Infants With Dysphagia.","authors":"Robert Brinton Fujiki, Abigail Nimtz, Susan L Thibeault","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of side-lying and semi-upright positions on videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) outcomes in infants with dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional, within-subject design was employed. Infants diagnosed with dysphagia and undergoing VFSS as part of standard of care were prospectively identified at a tertiary care academic children's hospital. Both semi-upright and side-lying positions were assessed with thin liquids using identical bottles/nipples across positions. Severity and frequency of penetration/aspiration and pharyngeal swallow timeliness were rated by three speech-language pathologists specialized in the evaluation and management of pediatric dysphagia. Severity of airway invasion was assessed using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and swallow timeliness using a 3-point ordinal scale. Mixed-level modeling was used to compare swallow outcomes across positions to determine if side-lying was associated with decreased severity and frequency of airway invasion and timelier pharyngeal swallow initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one infants diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia were included (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 4.3 months, <i>SD</i> = 2.2). Side-lying position was associated with a significant decrease in severity and frequency of penetration/aspiration when compared with semi-upright position (<i>p</i> < .001). Side-lying position was associated with a 91% decrease in the odds of presenting with a more severe PAS rating when compared with semi-upright position (odds ratio = .09, 95% confidence interval = [.03, .21]). Improvements in airway protection in side-lying position were most common in infants with deep penetration/aspiration in semi-upright position. Significantly fewer pharyngeal swallows were initiated at the level of the pyriform sinuses in side-lying position when compared with semi-upright position (<i>p</i> < .001); however, the lowest level of swallow initiation was similar across positions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Side-lying position in infants with dysphagia was associated with less severe and less frequent penetration/aspiration when compared with semi-upright position. Future research should identify predictors of which infants benefit most from side-lying position, as well as the physiological mechanisms underlying these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":"34 3","pages":"1366-1379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of side-lying and semi-upright positions on videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) outcomes in infants with dysphagia.

Method: A cross-sectional, within-subject design was employed. Infants diagnosed with dysphagia and undergoing VFSS as part of standard of care were prospectively identified at a tertiary care academic children's hospital. Both semi-upright and side-lying positions were assessed with thin liquids using identical bottles/nipples across positions. Severity and frequency of penetration/aspiration and pharyngeal swallow timeliness were rated by three speech-language pathologists specialized in the evaluation and management of pediatric dysphagia. Severity of airway invasion was assessed using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and swallow timeliness using a 3-point ordinal scale. Mixed-level modeling was used to compare swallow outcomes across positions to determine if side-lying was associated with decreased severity and frequency of airway invasion and timelier pharyngeal swallow initiation.

Results: Twenty-one infants diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia were included (Mage = 4.3 months, SD = 2.2). Side-lying position was associated with a significant decrease in severity and frequency of penetration/aspiration when compared with semi-upright position (p < .001). Side-lying position was associated with a 91% decrease in the odds of presenting with a more severe PAS rating when compared with semi-upright position (odds ratio = .09, 95% confidence interval = [.03, .21]). Improvements in airway protection in side-lying position were most common in infants with deep penetration/aspiration in semi-upright position. Significantly fewer pharyngeal swallows were initiated at the level of the pyriform sinuses in side-lying position when compared with semi-upright position (p < .001); however, the lowest level of swallow initiation was similar across positions.

Conclusions: Side-lying position in infants with dysphagia was associated with less severe and less frequent penetration/aspiration when compared with semi-upright position. Future research should identify predictors of which infants benefit most from side-lying position, as well as the physiological mechanisms underlying these findings.

与半直立体位相比,侧卧位与吞咽困难婴儿吞咽结果的改善有关。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨侧卧和半直立体位对吞咽困难婴儿的视频透视吞咽研究(VFSS)结果的影响。方法:采用横断面、受试者内设计。诊断为吞咽困难并接受VFSS作为标准护理的一部分的婴儿在三级保健学术儿童医院进行前瞻性鉴定。半直立和侧躺的姿势都是用相同的瓶子/奶嘴在不同的位置使用稀液体进行评估的。由三名专门评估和管理儿童吞咽困难的语言病理学家对穿透/吸入的严重程度和频率以及咽吞咽的及时性进行评分。气道侵犯的严重程度采用穿透-吸入量表(PAS)评估,吞咽及时性采用3分顺序量表评估。混合水平模型用于比较不同体位的吞咽结果,以确定侧躺是否与气道侵犯的严重程度和频率降低以及咽部吞咽开始时间较早有关。结果:21例诊断为口咽吞咽困难的婴儿(Mage = 4.3个月,SD = 2.2)被纳入。侧卧位与半直立位相比,穿刺/误吸的严重程度和频率显著降低(p < 0.001)。侧卧位与半直立位相比,出现更严重PAS评分的几率降低91%(优势比= 0.09,95%可信区间=[])。03 . 21])。侧卧位对气道保护的改善最常见于半直立位深度渗透/吸入的婴儿。侧卧位与半直立位相比,梨状窦水平起咽咽的次数显著减少(p < 0.001);然而,吞咽起始的最低水平在不同的体位是相似的。结论:与半直立体位相比,侧卧位婴儿吞咽困难的严重程度和频率较低。未来的研究应该确定哪些婴儿从侧躺姿势中获益最多的预测因素,以及这些发现背后的生理机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信