A Network Analysis of Personality Traits in Adults with and Without Specific Learning Disorders.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mohamad Ahmad Saleem Khasawneh
{"title":"A Network Analysis of Personality Traits in Adults with and Without Specific Learning Disorders.","authors":"Mohamad Ahmad Saleem Khasawneh","doi":"10.1007/s11126-025-10146-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary aim of this study was to examine the personality profile of adults with Specific Learning Disorders (SLDs) using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) to assess maladaptive traits and explore the underlying network structure of these traits in comparison to healthy individuals. The sample included 181 adults with SLDs (mean age = 27.37 ± 6.82; 39.21% female) and 227 healthy adults (mean age = 30.08 ± 7.49; 35.36% female). All participants completed the PID-5 and a socio-demographic checklist. Group differences in PID-5 scores were analyzed using independent-sample t-tests. Network analysis, including the Network Comparison Test (NCT) and centrality assessments, was conducted to examine overall network organization and identify key traits within the maladaptive trait networks. The results showed that adults with SLDs had significantly higher scores in detachment (43.99 ± 22.70 vs. 32.27 ± 17.53, p < 0.05) and negative affectivity (111.97 ± 35.06 vs. 87.26 ± 40.58, p < 0.05) compared to healthy controls. Their personality trait network was more densely connected, with a global strength of 44.95, compared to 36.22 in the control group (p < 0.01). Key traits in the SLD network included suspiciousness (betweenness = 2.116, closeness = 2.286, strength = 1.266), anhedonia (betweenness = 2.240), and eccentricity (strength = 2.146, betweenness = 1.498), indicating stronger interactions among maladaptive traits. A particularly strong connection (edge weight = 0.4059) was observed between withdrawal and anhedonia. In contrast, the control group's network was more balanced, with the most dominant node (N5) exhibiting a strength of 2.1859 and betweenness of 3.5000. These findings highlight distinct personality patterns in individuals with SLDs, underscoring the need for tailored clinical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20658,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-025-10146-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to examine the personality profile of adults with Specific Learning Disorders (SLDs) using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) to assess maladaptive traits and explore the underlying network structure of these traits in comparison to healthy individuals. The sample included 181 adults with SLDs (mean age = 27.37 ± 6.82; 39.21% female) and 227 healthy adults (mean age = 30.08 ± 7.49; 35.36% female). All participants completed the PID-5 and a socio-demographic checklist. Group differences in PID-5 scores were analyzed using independent-sample t-tests. Network analysis, including the Network Comparison Test (NCT) and centrality assessments, was conducted to examine overall network organization and identify key traits within the maladaptive trait networks. The results showed that adults with SLDs had significantly higher scores in detachment (43.99 ± 22.70 vs. 32.27 ± 17.53, p < 0.05) and negative affectivity (111.97 ± 35.06 vs. 87.26 ± 40.58, p < 0.05) compared to healthy controls. Their personality trait network was more densely connected, with a global strength of 44.95, compared to 36.22 in the control group (p < 0.01). Key traits in the SLD network included suspiciousness (betweenness = 2.116, closeness = 2.286, strength = 1.266), anhedonia (betweenness = 2.240), and eccentricity (strength = 2.146, betweenness = 1.498), indicating stronger interactions among maladaptive traits. A particularly strong connection (edge weight = 0.4059) was observed between withdrawal and anhedonia. In contrast, the control group's network was more balanced, with the most dominant node (N5) exhibiting a strength of 2.1859 and betweenness of 3.5000. These findings highlight distinct personality patterns in individuals with SLDs, underscoring the need for tailored clinical interventions.

有和没有特殊学习障碍的成人人格特征的网络分析。
本研究的主要目的是利用人格量表(PID-5)对成人特殊学习障碍(SLDs)患者的人格特征进行评估,并与健康个体进行比较,探讨这些特征的潜在网络结构。样本包括181例成人SLDs患者(平均年龄= 27.37±6.82;女性39.21%),健康成人227人(平均年龄= 30.08±7.49;35.36%的女性)。所有参与者都完成了PID-5和社会人口统计检查表。PID-5评分的组间差异采用独立样本t检验分析。网络分析包括网络比较测试(NCT)和中心性评估,以检查整体网络组织,并确定适应不良特征网络中的关键特征。结果显示,成人SLDs患者在脱离方面的得分明显高于对照组(43.99±22.70比32.27±17.53,p . 596)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric Quarterly
Psychiatric Quarterly PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Quarterly publishes original research, theoretical papers, and review articles on the assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons with psychiatric disabilities, with emphasis on care provided in public, community, and private institutional settings such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Qualitative and quantitative studies concerning the social, clinical, administrative, legal, political, and ethical aspects of mental health care fall within the scope of the journal. Content areas include, but are not limited to, evidence-based practice in prevention, diagnosis, and management of psychiatric disorders; interface of psychiatry with primary and specialty medicine; disparities of access and outcomes in health care service delivery; and socio-cultural and cross-cultural aspects of mental health and wellness, including mental health literacy. 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.023 (2007) Section ''Psychiatry'': Rank 70 out of 82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信