Sung-Hee Oh , Jaehee Lee , Junwoo Jo , Jin-Won Kwon
{"title":"Adverse events of tuberculosis preventive therapy among individuals with latent tuberculosis infection: A nationwide cohort study in South Korea","authors":"Sung-Hee Oh , Jaehee Lee , Junwoo Jo , Jin-Won Kwon","doi":"10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study assessed adverse event with tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) regimens among individuals with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using national health insurance data, we analyzed individuals newly diagnosed with LTBI between 2015 and 2020. The TPT group, prescribed 3 months of isoniazid and rifampicin (3HR), 4 months of rifampicin (4R), or 9 months of isoniazid (9H), was matched with a control group through 1:1 propensity score matching. Drug-related adverse events were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 220,483 diagnosed with LTBI, 49.0% received TPT, primarily 3HR (74.6%). The incidence of any adverse events with TPT was 11.90%, with 8.94% of these events being severe events requiring hospitalization. Hepatotoxicity risk was 6.48-, 4.79-, and 3.50-fold with 3HR, 9H, and 4R, respectively, compared to controls. Severe cutaneous adverse reaction risk was 4.27-, 1.83-, and 1.93-fold with 3HR, 9H, and 4R. 4R had the lowest risk of any adverse events, while 3HR had the highest. Permanent discontinuation occurred in 2.3%, 3.1%, and 3.3% with 4R, 9H, and 3HR, respectively. Unlike 9H, rifampicin-based regimens showed no age-related trend in adverse event risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>4R is a better option considering safety across a broad age range, suggesting it could be encouraged in the LTBI population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 107914"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971225001377","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This study assessed adverse event with tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) regimens among individuals with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).
Methods
Using national health insurance data, we analyzed individuals newly diagnosed with LTBI between 2015 and 2020. The TPT group, prescribed 3 months of isoniazid and rifampicin (3HR), 4 months of rifampicin (4R), or 9 months of isoniazid (9H), was matched with a control group through 1:1 propensity score matching. Drug-related adverse events were reported.
Results
Of 220,483 diagnosed with LTBI, 49.0% received TPT, primarily 3HR (74.6%). The incidence of any adverse events with TPT was 11.90%, with 8.94% of these events being severe events requiring hospitalization. Hepatotoxicity risk was 6.48-, 4.79-, and 3.50-fold with 3HR, 9H, and 4R, respectively, compared to controls. Severe cutaneous adverse reaction risk was 4.27-, 1.83-, and 1.93-fold with 3HR, 9H, and 4R. 4R had the lowest risk of any adverse events, while 3HR had the highest. Permanent discontinuation occurred in 2.3%, 3.1%, and 3.3% with 4R, 9H, and 3HR, respectively. Unlike 9H, rifampicin-based regimens showed no age-related trend in adverse event risk.
Conclusions
4R is a better option considering safety across a broad age range, suggesting it could be encouraged in the LTBI population.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID)
Publisher: International Society for Infectious Diseases
Publication Frequency: Monthly
Type: Peer-reviewed, Open Access
Scope:
Publishes original clinical and laboratory-based research.
Reports clinical trials, reviews, and some case reports.
Focuses on epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of infectious diseases.
Emphasizes diseases common in under-resourced countries.