Code conflict in an event file task is reflected by aperiodic neural activity.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuroreport Pub Date : 2025-05-07 Epub Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1097/WNR.0000000000002156
Jimin Yan, Lorenza Colzato, Bernhard Hommel
{"title":"Code conflict in an event file task is reflected by aperiodic neural activity.","authors":"Jimin Yan, Lorenza Colzato, Bernhard Hommel","doi":"10.1097/WNR.0000000000002156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the relationship between aperiodic electroencephalography (EEG) activity and code conflict, hypothesizing that the former might serve as an indicator of the latter. We analyzed EEG and behavioral outcomes of a sample performing the event file task, which assesses code conflict in co-occurring or temporally overlapping stimulus and response features. To quantify aperiodic activity, we employed the fitting oscillations & one-over-f algorithm. The behavioral results revealed a typical partial-repetition cost effect, indicating that performance is impaired if the stimulus repeats while the response alternates, or vice versa. This suggests that the previously combined shape and response were stored in an event file and retrieved when any one of these components was repeated. Notably, this effect was also evident in the aperiodic exponent, which was lower for partial repetitions than for full repetitions or alternations, implying increased cortical noise, a higher excitatory E/I ratio, and noisier decision-making processes. The scalp distribution of this effect aligns with its sensorimotor characteristics. Thus, we interpret these findings as promising preliminary evidence that the aperiodic exponent may serve as a valuable neural marker of code conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":19213,"journal":{"name":"Neuroreport","volume":"36 7","pages":"337-341"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroreport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000002156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between aperiodic electroencephalography (EEG) activity and code conflict, hypothesizing that the former might serve as an indicator of the latter. We analyzed EEG and behavioral outcomes of a sample performing the event file task, which assesses code conflict in co-occurring or temporally overlapping stimulus and response features. To quantify aperiodic activity, we employed the fitting oscillations & one-over-f algorithm. The behavioral results revealed a typical partial-repetition cost effect, indicating that performance is impaired if the stimulus repeats while the response alternates, or vice versa. This suggests that the previously combined shape and response were stored in an event file and retrieved when any one of these components was repeated. Notably, this effect was also evident in the aperiodic exponent, which was lower for partial repetitions than for full repetitions or alternations, implying increased cortical noise, a higher excitatory E/I ratio, and noisier decision-making processes. The scalp distribution of this effect aligns with its sensorimotor characteristics. Thus, we interpret these findings as promising preliminary evidence that the aperiodic exponent may serve as a valuable neural marker of code conflict.

事件文件任务中的代码冲突通过非周期神经活动反映出来。
我们研究了非周期脑电图(EEG)活动和编码冲突之间的关系,假设前者可以作为后者的一个指标。我们分析了一个执行事件文件任务的样本的脑电图和行为结果,该任务评估了共同发生或暂时重叠的刺激和反应特征中的代码冲突。为了量化非周期活动,我们采用了拟合振荡和1 -over-f算法。行为结果显示了典型的部分重复成本效应,表明如果刺激重复而反应交替,则表现受损,反之亦然。这表明先前组合的形状和响应存储在事件文件中,并在重复这些组件中的任何一个时检索。值得注意的是,这种效应在非周期指数中也很明显,部分重复的非周期指数比完全重复或交替的低,这意味着皮质噪声增加,兴奋性E/I比更高,决策过程更嘈杂。这种效应在头皮上的分布与其感觉运动特征一致。因此,我们将这些发现解释为有希望的初步证据,即非周期指数可能作为编码冲突的有价值的神经标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroreport
Neuroreport 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: NeuroReport is a channel for rapid communication of new findings in neuroscience. It is a forum for the publication of short but complete reports of important studies that require very fast publication. Papers are accepted on the basis of the novelty of their finding, on their significance for neuroscience and on a clear need for rapid publication. Preliminary communications are not suitable for the Journal. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. The core interest of the Journal is on studies that cast light on how the brain (and the whole of the nervous system) works. We aim to give authors a decision on their submission within 2-5 weeks, and all accepted articles appear in the next issue to press.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信