{"title":"Code conflict in an event file task is reflected by aperiodic neural activity.","authors":"Jimin Yan, Lorenza Colzato, Bernhard Hommel","doi":"10.1097/WNR.0000000000002156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the relationship between aperiodic electroencephalography (EEG) activity and code conflict, hypothesizing that the former might serve as an indicator of the latter. We analyzed EEG and behavioral outcomes of a sample performing the event file task, which assesses code conflict in co-occurring or temporally overlapping stimulus and response features. To quantify aperiodic activity, we employed the fitting oscillations & one-over-f algorithm. The behavioral results revealed a typical partial-repetition cost effect, indicating that performance is impaired if the stimulus repeats while the response alternates, or vice versa. This suggests that the previously combined shape and response were stored in an event file and retrieved when any one of these components was repeated. Notably, this effect was also evident in the aperiodic exponent, which was lower for partial repetitions than for full repetitions or alternations, implying increased cortical noise, a higher excitatory E/I ratio, and noisier decision-making processes. The scalp distribution of this effect aligns with its sensorimotor characteristics. Thus, we interpret these findings as promising preliminary evidence that the aperiodic exponent may serve as a valuable neural marker of code conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":19213,"journal":{"name":"Neuroreport","volume":"36 7","pages":"337-341"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroreport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000002156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigated the relationship between aperiodic electroencephalography (EEG) activity and code conflict, hypothesizing that the former might serve as an indicator of the latter. We analyzed EEG and behavioral outcomes of a sample performing the event file task, which assesses code conflict in co-occurring or temporally overlapping stimulus and response features. To quantify aperiodic activity, we employed the fitting oscillations & one-over-f algorithm. The behavioral results revealed a typical partial-repetition cost effect, indicating that performance is impaired if the stimulus repeats while the response alternates, or vice versa. This suggests that the previously combined shape and response were stored in an event file and retrieved when any one of these components was repeated. Notably, this effect was also evident in the aperiodic exponent, which was lower for partial repetitions than for full repetitions or alternations, implying increased cortical noise, a higher excitatory E/I ratio, and noisier decision-making processes. The scalp distribution of this effect aligns with its sensorimotor characteristics. Thus, we interpret these findings as promising preliminary evidence that the aperiodic exponent may serve as a valuable neural marker of code conflict.
期刊介绍:
NeuroReport is a channel for rapid communication of new findings in neuroscience. It is a forum for the publication of short but complete reports of important studies that require very fast publication. Papers are accepted on the basis of the novelty of their finding, on their significance for neuroscience and on a clear need for rapid publication. Preliminary communications are not suitable for the Journal. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
The core interest of the Journal is on studies that cast light on how the brain (and the whole of the nervous system) works.
We aim to give authors a decision on their submission within 2-5 weeks, and all accepted articles appear in the next issue to press.