Use of an Electronic Medical Record Alert to Prevent Iatrogenic Interventions in Patients With Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200457
Serena Yin, Lydia Wolkiewicz, Bichun Ouyang, Adriana Bermeo-Ovalle
{"title":"Use of an Electronic Medical Record Alert to Prevent Iatrogenic Interventions in Patients With Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures.","authors":"Serena Yin, Lydia Wolkiewicz, Bichun Ouyang, Adriana Bermeo-Ovalle","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Seizures are a common presentation to the emergency department and the hospital setting. Psychogenic or functional seizures are often misdiagnosed as epileptic seizures or status epilepticus, and patients are subject to aggressive interventions including sedation, intubations, and prolonged hospital admissions. An electronic medical record (EMR) best practice alert (BPA) was implemented in 2016 for all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) at Rush University Medical Center. It informs health care providers of the diagnosis and provides education on interacting with the patient's chart. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an EMR BPA in preventing iatrogenic interventions for patients with a diagnosis of PNES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who presented to Rush University Medical Center between January 2017 and December 2019 and had a PNES BPA triggered. Data on emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient admissions for these patients from the year before and the year after the first BPA trigger were compared. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A PNES BPA was triggered in 178 patients. One hundred and forty-three (80%) were female. The mean age was 41 (18-81) years. There was a decrease in the number of ED visits; hospital admissions; intensive care unit (ICU) admissions; and interventions such as intubations and rescue benzodiazepine use in the year after the BPA was first triggered compared with the previous year (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No adverse events were identified in relation to the BPA.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates that the use of an EMR BPA can be safe and effective in preventing potential iatrogenic interventions and reducing acute health care utilization in patients with PNES. These BPAs can also be used as an educational tool to communicate the presentation, risks, and needs of these patients within the hospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 3","pages":"e200457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Seizures are a common presentation to the emergency department and the hospital setting. Psychogenic or functional seizures are often misdiagnosed as epileptic seizures or status epilepticus, and patients are subject to aggressive interventions including sedation, intubations, and prolonged hospital admissions. An electronic medical record (EMR) best practice alert (BPA) was implemented in 2016 for all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) at Rush University Medical Center. It informs health care providers of the diagnosis and provides education on interacting with the patient's chart. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an EMR BPA in preventing iatrogenic interventions for patients with a diagnosis of PNES.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who presented to Rush University Medical Center between January 2017 and December 2019 and had a PNES BPA triggered. Data on emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient admissions for these patients from the year before and the year after the first BPA trigger were compared. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test were used for analysis.

Results: A PNES BPA was triggered in 178 patients. One hundred and forty-three (80%) were female. The mean age was 41 (18-81) years. There was a decrease in the number of ED visits; hospital admissions; intensive care unit (ICU) admissions; and interventions such as intubations and rescue benzodiazepine use in the year after the BPA was first triggered compared with the previous year (p < 0.05). No adverse events were identified in relation to the BPA.

Discussion: This study demonstrates that the use of an EMR BPA can be safe and effective in preventing potential iatrogenic interventions and reducing acute health care utilization in patients with PNES. These BPAs can also be used as an educational tool to communicate the presentation, risks, and needs of these patients within the hospital setting.

使用电子病历警报预防因心因性非癫痫发作患者的医源性干预。
背景和目的:癫痫发作是急诊科和医院的常见表现。心因性或功能性癫痫发作常被误诊为癫痫发作或癫痫持续状态,患者需接受积极干预,包括镇静、插管和延长住院时间。2016年,拉什大学医学中心对所有确诊为心因性非癫痫性发作(PNES)的患者实施了电子病历(EMR)最佳实践警报(BPA)。它告知医疗保健提供者诊断,并提供与患者图表互动的教育。本研究评估EMR双酚a对诊断为PNES的患者预防医源性干预的有效性。方法:对2017年1月至2019年12月期间在拉什大学医学中心就诊并触发PNES BPA的所有患者进行回顾性图表回顾。研究人员比较了这些患者首次双酚a诱发前后一年的急诊就诊和住院数据。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和McNemar检验进行分析。结果:178例患者触发PNES双酚A。143例(80%)为女性。平均年龄41岁(18-81岁)。急诊科就诊次数有所减少;住院;重症监护病房(ICU)入院;双酚a首次触发后一年插管和抢救苯二氮卓类药物使用等干预措施与前一年比较(p < 0.05)。没有发现与BPA有关的不良事件。讨论:本研究表明,使用EMR双酚a可以安全有效地预防潜在的医源性干预,并减少PNES患者的急性医疗保健使用率。这些双酚a也可以作为一种教育工具,在医院环境中沟通这些患者的表现、风险和需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信