{"title":"Within-visit blood pressure variability in children and adolescents in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013-2020).","authors":"Sandeep K Riar, Scott Gillespie, Andrew M South","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood pressure (BP) varies depending on several factors. The objective of our study was to describe within-visit BP variability (BPV) in healthy children and compare BPV between manual and automated BP readings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included individuals aged 8-17 years with three BP readings from NHANES 2013-2020 cycles. From 2013 to 2016, BP was obtained using auscultation (manual protocol, MP) and, subsequently, using oscillometry (automated protocol, AP). We excluded individuals with DBP 'zero'.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 5656 individuals [MP group: 3365 (59.5%); AP group: 2291 (40.5%]), a ΔBP (difference between highest and lowest of three BP readings) at least 5 mmHg was noted in 49.1 and 60.7% of individuals for SBP and DBP, respectively. ΔDBP at least 10 mmHg was twice as common in the MP group as in the AP group. ΔDBP at least 20 mmHg was observed in 4.4% individuals. A difference of at least 5 mmHg between the initial and averaged second and third BP readings was noted in 24.9 and 34.5% of individuals for SBP and DBP, respectively. The highest of three BP readings was the first, second, or third in 44.2, 30.5, and 25.4% of individuals, for SBP, and 42.4, 29.8, and 27.7%, for DBP respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Less than half of individuals had three DBP readings within 5 mmHg and some had ΔBP at least 20 mmHg. Initial BP is not always the highest; inclusion of the second and third BP readings may be more representative of the individual's actual BP. DBPV was higher with manual than with automated BP measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"1158-1168"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Blood pressure (BP) varies depending on several factors. The objective of our study was to describe within-visit BP variability (BPV) in healthy children and compare BPV between manual and automated BP readings.
Methods: We included individuals aged 8-17 years with three BP readings from NHANES 2013-2020 cycles. From 2013 to 2016, BP was obtained using auscultation (manual protocol, MP) and, subsequently, using oscillometry (automated protocol, AP). We excluded individuals with DBP 'zero'.
Results: In 5656 individuals [MP group: 3365 (59.5%); AP group: 2291 (40.5%]), a ΔBP (difference between highest and lowest of three BP readings) at least 5 mmHg was noted in 49.1 and 60.7% of individuals for SBP and DBP, respectively. ΔDBP at least 10 mmHg was twice as common in the MP group as in the AP group. ΔDBP at least 20 mmHg was observed in 4.4% individuals. A difference of at least 5 mmHg between the initial and averaged second and third BP readings was noted in 24.9 and 34.5% of individuals for SBP and DBP, respectively. The highest of three BP readings was the first, second, or third in 44.2, 30.5, and 25.4% of individuals, for SBP, and 42.4, 29.8, and 27.7%, for DBP respectively.
Conclusion: Less than half of individuals had three DBP readings within 5 mmHg and some had ΔBP at least 20 mmHg. Initial BP is not always the highest; inclusion of the second and third BP readings may be more representative of the individual's actual BP. DBPV was higher with manual than with automated BP measurement.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.